Literature DB >> 26404947

The efficacy of two oral hygiene regimens in reducing oral malodour: a randomised clinical trial.

Magda Feres1, Luciene Cristina Figueiredo1, Marcelo Faveri1, Marcelo C Guerra1, Luis R Mateo2, Bernal Stewart3, Malcolm Williams3, Foti Panagakos3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy of two oral hygiene regimens in reducing oral malodour and the proportions of bacterial species involved in the production of volatile sulphur compounds.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy subjects who participated in a halitosis-induction phase and achieved an organoleptic score of ≥ 3.0 [time point 0 (T0)] randomised into two groups: brushing with regular fluoride toothpaste alone (control group) or brushing with regular fluoride toothpaste followed by rinsing with a 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouthwash (CPC group). Subjects followed their assigned oral hygiene regimen for 21 days. Then, they underwent an organoleptic examination and measurement of volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs) using a portable gas chromatograph, 12 hours after their last oral hygiene procedure (T1) and 4 hours after an on-site oral hygiene (T2). Microbiological samples (supragingival biofilm, tongue coating and saliva) were analysed using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridisation.
RESULTS: Both therapies statistically significantly improved the organoleptic scores (P < 0.05), but the VSC levels and/or concentrations were reduced only in the CPC group (P < 0.05). In subjects rinsing with CPC, oral malodour scores were reduced by 49% at the 4-hour assessment (T2) compared with those not rinsing (P < 0.05). Red-complex pathogens were reduced more effectively in the CPC group than in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Brushing followed by rinsing with a 0.075% CPC mouthwash provided statistically significantly greater reductions in oral malodour, measured organoleptically and instrumentally, and in the proportions of red-complex species when compared with brushing alone.
© 2015 FDI World Dental Federation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Halitosis; antimicrobial activity; cetylpyridinium chloride; mouthwash; oral malodour; treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26404947      PMCID: PMC9376512          DOI: 10.1111/idj.12183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Dent J        ISSN: 0020-6539            Impact factor:   2.607


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of different treatment modalities for oral halitosis.

Authors:  Seida Erovic Ademovski; Peter Lingström; Edwin Winkel; Albert Tangerman; G Rutger Persson; Stefan Renvert
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  A clinical study to assess the 12-hour antimicrobial effects of cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwashes on supragingival plaque bacteria.

Authors:  Songlin He; Yin Wei; Xu Fan; Deyu Hu; P K Sreenivasan
Journal:  J Clin Dent       Date:  2011

3.  Reduction of malodor by oral cleansing procedures.

Authors:  J Tonzetich; S K Ng
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1976-08

4.  Bad breath: etiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  J F Tessier; G V Kulkarni
Journal:  Oral Health       Date:  1991-10

Review 5.  Treatment of oral malodour. Medium-term efficacy of mechanical and/or chemical agents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dagmar E Slot; Sophie De Geest; Fridus A van der Weijden; Marc Quirynen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  Clinical effects of a new mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine, cetylpyridinium chloride and zinc-lactate on oral halitosis. A dual-center, double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  E G Winkel; S Roldán; A J Van Winkelhoff; D Herrera; M Sanz
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.728

7.  Clinical oral malodor measurement with a portable sulfide monitor.

Authors:  M Ueno; K Shinada; T Yanagisawa; C Mori; S Yokoyama; S Furukawa; S Takehara; Y Kawaguchi
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.511

Review 8.  A review of the current literature on management of halitosis.

Authors:  A M W T van den Broek; L Feenstra; C de Baat
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.511

9.  Efficacy of a 2-phase oil: water mouthrinse in controlling oral malodor, gingivitis, and plaque.

Authors:  A Kozlovsky; S Goldberg; I Natour; A Rogatky-Gat; I Gelernter; M Rosenberg
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.993

10.  The short-term treatment effects on the microbiota at the dorsum of the tongue in intra-oral halitosis patients--a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Seida Erovic Ademovski; G Rutger Persson; Edwin Winkel; Albert Tangerman; Peter Lingström; Stefan Renvert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  4 in total

1.  Interventions for managing halitosis.

Authors:  Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Prashanti Eachempati; Eswara Uma; Vijendra Pal Singh; Noorliza Mastura Ismail; Eby Varghese
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-11

2.  A new technique for tongue brushing and halitosis reduction: the X technique.

Authors:  Ana Carolina de Souza Gonçalves; Marisol Corvino Nogueira Martins; Bruna Luísa de Paula; Paulo Henrique Weckwerth; Solange de Oliveira Braga Franzolin; Elcia Maria Varize Silveira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.144

3.  Pilot study on selective antimicrobial effect of a halitosis mouthrinse: monospecies and saliva-derived microbiome in an in vitro model system.

Authors:  Márcia Botelho Dinis; Melissa Agnello; Xuesong He; Wenyuan Shi; Nini Chaichanasakul Tran
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 5.474

4.  Evaluation of the Efficacy of Lacer HaliTM Treatment on the Management of Halitosis: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Laiqi Xiang; Rosa Rojo; Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.