| Literature DB >> 26404334 |
Marco Cossio-Bolaños1,2, Rossana Gómez Campos3,4,5,6, Cynthia Lee Andruske7, Antonio Viveros Flores8, Cristian Luarte-Rocha9, Pedro R Olivares10, Javier Garcia-Rubio11, Miguel de Arruda12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peru is experiencing a stage of nutritional transition where the principal characteristics are typical of countries undergoing development.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; biological age; nutritional transitions; physical growth
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26404334 PMCID: PMC4626956 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph121012082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Variables of physical growth, body weight and nutritional status of the study sample.
| Males (n = 312) | Females (n = 239) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
| Age (years) | 14.8 | 0.09 | 14.48 | 0.10 |
| Weight (Kg) | 56.2 | 10.3 | 50.9 | 7.7 |
| Standing Height (cm) | 161.2 | 8.0 | 153.1 | 5.5 |
| Sitting Height (cm) | 84.4 | 4.6 | 81.6 | 3.2 |
| Biological Age (APHV) | 15.2 | 0.8 | 12.7 | 0.3 |
Notes: *: p < 0.05, biological age was determined by the years from age at peak height velocity (APHV), standard deviation (SD).
Figure 1Z-scores for weight and height by age for adolescents of both sexes living in Arequipa (Peru) compared to the CDC-2000 references.
Figure 2Relationship between chronological age (AC) and biological age (years from age at peak height velocity (APHV) of adolescents of both sexes from Arequipa (2320 m).
Prevalence of nutritional status as a function of weight for age and height for age by sex in adolescents living at a moderate altitude.
| Nutritional Status 1 | Males | Females |
|---|---|---|
| Underweight | 13 (4.2%) | 11 (4.6%) |
| Normal Weight | 264 (84.5%) | 207 (86.6%) |
| Overweight | 35 (11.3%) | 21 (8.8%) |
| Stunted | 27 (8.7%) | 43 (18.0%) |
| Non-Stunted | 285 (91.3%) | 195 (82.0%) |
Notes: Chi-square test for Weight for age 0.909, 2df (degrees of freedom), p = 0.60347; Chi-square test for Height for age 9.94, 1df (degrees of freedom) ( p = 0.0016. 1 = Z-scores (CDC-2000).
Association of stunted growth with nutritional categories by weight for age of adolescents of both sexes.
| Weight-For-Age | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stunted | Underweight | Normal | Overweight | Total | |
| Males (n = 312) | |||||
| Stunted | 6 (1.9%) | 16 (5.1%) | 5 (1.6%) | 27 (8.6%) | 0.0001 |
| Non-Stunted | 7 (2.2) | 248 (79.5%) | 30 (9.6%) | 285 (92.2%) | |
| Females (n = 239) | |||||
| Stunted | 5 (2.1%) | 31 (13.0%) | 7 (2.9%) | 43 (18.0%) | 0.0043 |
| Non-Stunted | 6 (2.5%) | 177 (74.0%) | 13 (5.4%) | 196 (82.0%) | |
| Stunted | 11 (1.9%) | 31 (8.5%) | 7 (2.2%) | 43 (12.6%) | 0.0001 |
| Non-Stunted | 13 (2.4%) | 177 (77.1%) | 13 (7.8%) | 196 (90.3%) | |
Notes: Chi-square test for males 26.80, 2df; for females 10.90, df, and both sexes 31.08, 2df.
Comparison between stunted growth and nutritional groups by weight for age.
| Weight-For-Age | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underweight | Normal | Overweight | ||||||||
| N | X | SD | N | X | SD | N | X | SD | ||
| Males | ||||||||||
| Stunted | 6 | 44.8 | 7.79 | 16 | 50.84 | 8.92 | 5 | 80.46 | 1.61 | 0.0001 |
| Non-Stunted | 7 | 45.3 | 6.07 | 248 | 54.80 | 8.01 | 30 | 70.15 | 11.64 | 0.0001 |
| Females | ||||||||||
| Stunted | 5 | 42 | 3.03 | 31 | 50.89 | 6.32 | 7 | 77.1 | 2.25 | 0.0001 |
| Non-Stunted | 6 | 40.57 | 2.76 | 177 | 50.96 | 6.30 | 13 | 65.67 | 5.07 | 0.0001 |
| Stunted | 11 | 43.40 | 5.41 | 47 | 50.87 | 7.62 | 12 | 78.78 | 1.93 | 0.0001 |
| Non-Stunted | 13 | 42.93 | 4.42 | 425 | 52.88 | 7.16 | 13 | 67.91 | 8.36 | 0.0001 |