N Okera1, V Escabasse2, A Coste2, A E Albers3. 1. Département d'otorhinolaryngologie, chirurgie cervico-faciale, maxillo-faciale et plastique, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 2, rue Ambroise-Paré, 75010 Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot, UFR de médecine Paris VII - Denis Diderot, France. 2. Service d'otorhinolaryngologie, stomatologie et chirurgie cervico-faciale, Hôpital intercommunal de Créteil, 40, rue Verdun, 94000 Créteil, France; Université Paris Est Créteil Val-de-Marne, Unité Inserm 955, France. 3. Klinik für Hals- Nasen-, Ohrheilkunde, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of ORL training in France and hierarchical relationships, working conditions and quality of life, based on a questionnaire answered by ORL residents and fellows. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The anonymous questionnaire covered the following topics (106 questions): structure of training, supervision by superiors, involvement in teaching medical students, work for publication, working conditions, quality of life and practical and surgical skills. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen questionnaires were included, with 56% female respondents and 78% resident respondents. A total of 80% of respondents would choose the same training again, with overall satisfaction of 70%. In total, 71% felt appreciated, with responsibilities matching their level of training (85%). Supervisors were supportive (85%) and showed good teaching ability (92%). Residents were mainly guided by fellows (70%), or consultants (60%). Providing good training was an important aim for the training structures (78%). Respondents worked 11 hours per day, with a median of 4 duties per month; the post-duty rest-day was fully respected in the case of 38% of respondents. Surgical procedures were taught and delegated step by step, shared fairly between residents, in a large majority of cases. Training progression was in line with seniority. CONCLUSIONS: Overall satisfaction, quality and supervision of ORL training were good in France. There remain geographical differences in terms of theoretical and surgical training.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of ORL training in France and hierarchical relationships, working conditions and quality of life, based on a questionnaire answered by ORL residents and fellows. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The anonymous questionnaire covered the following topics (106 questions): structure of training, supervision by superiors, involvement in teaching medical students, work for publication, working conditions, quality of life and practical and surgical skills. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen questionnaires were included, with 56% female respondents and 78% resident respondents. A total of 80% of respondents would choose the same training again, with overall satisfaction of 70%. In total, 71% felt appreciated, with responsibilities matching their level of training (85%). Supervisors were supportive (85%) and showed good teaching ability (92%). Residents were mainly guided by fellows (70%), or consultants (60%). Providing good training was an important aim for the training structures (78%). Respondents worked 11 hours per day, with a median of 4 duties per month; the post-duty rest-day was fully respected in the case of 38% of respondents. Surgical procedures were taught and delegated step by step, shared fairly between residents, in a large majority of cases. Training progression was in line with seniority. CONCLUSIONS: Overall satisfaction, quality and supervision of ORL training were good in France. There remain geographical differences in terms of theoretical and surgical training.
Keywords:
Companionship; Medical and surgical training; Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery postgraduate degree; Otolaryngology and Head & Neck surgery residency in France; Quality of life; Satisfaction; Supervision of training