| Literature DB >> 26403618 |
Stavros M Stivaros1,2, Mark R Radon3, Reneta Mileva4, Daniel J A Connolly5, Patricia E Cowell6, Nigel Hoggard7, Neville B Wright8, Vivian Tang8, Ann Gledson4, Ruth Batty5, John A Keane4, Paul D Griffiths9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Birth-related acute profound hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury has specific patterns of damage including the paracentral lobules.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Corpus callosum; Hypoxic–ischaemic brain injury; Magnetic resonance imaging; Support vector machine analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26403618 PMCID: PMC4706576 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3444-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Radiol ISSN: 0301-0449
Fig. 1MR images in a 6-year old boy with dyskinetic cerebral palsy who has the typical neuroimaging findings of acute profound hypoxic–ischaemic brain injury. a, b Axial T2-weighted MR images at the level of the basal ganglia (a) and peri-rolandic cortex (b) show gliosis and reduction in volume of the putamina (open arrows), thalami and paracentral lobules (solid arrows). c A mid-sagittal T1-weighted MR image shows a focal reduction in thickness in the posterior part of the body of the corpus callosum (arrows)
Clinical and radiologic summary of the children with acute profound hypoxic–ischaemic brain injury
| Patient number | Gender | Weeks’ gestationb | Apgar at 5 min | Umbilical blood pH | Cerebral palsy type | Age at MRI | Damage to putamen | Damage to thalamus | Damage to PCWM | Other sites of damage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | M | 39 | 4 | Not recorded | Dyskinetic | 15 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Vermis, Hippocampi |
| 2 | M | 38 | 3 | Not recorded | Dyskinetic | 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | STN |
| 3 a | M | 40 | 5 | 6.9 | Spastic | 15 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Vermis |
| 4 | M | 36 | 0 | 6.6 | Spastic | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Vermis, hippocampi |
| 5 a | F | 41 | 3 | Not recorded | Spastic | 3 | Yes | No | Yes | OR |
| 6 a | M | 39 | 4 | 6.7 | Dyskinetic | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Vermis, hippocampi |
| 7 a | M | 39 | 6 | Not recorded | Spastic | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | OR, hippocampi |
| 8 a | M | 39 | 4 | 6.9 | Spastic | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Vermis, STN |
| 9 a | M | 39 | 3 | Not recorded | Dyskinetic | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | OR, STN |
| 10 | M | 40 | 2 | 6.8 | Dyskinetic | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Hippocampi, STN |
| 11 a | F | 41 | 4 | 6.9 | Spastic | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Vermis, OR, STN |
| 12 a | M | 40 | 5 | Not recorded | Spastic | 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | OR |
| 13 a | M | 40 | 4 | 6.7 | Dyskinetic | 3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | OR, STN |
a Indicates children also reported for subthalamic nucleus assessment [14]
bAll children had seizure onset in the first day of life
OR optic radiations, PCWM paracentral white matter, STN subthalamic nucleus
Fig. 2a A midline sagittal T1-weighted image showing a normal corpus callosum from a 6 year old age matched control child. The image also shows the placement of regions of interest and 99th percentile widths, with centreline based on the Denenberg technique [3]. b The width profiles (95% CI of the mean) for each centile generated for the control cases (blue) and the age-matched profound hypoxic–ischaemic brain injury cases (yellow)
Fig. 3Analysis of the corpus callosum. a Schematic representations of the loadings of the individual component factors mapped onto a schematic corpus callosum. The grey-scale density represents the weighting of each individual width within the factor. Factors 1-7 represent, respectively, the genu, anterior body, mid body, mid-posterior body, posterior body, splenium, and the extreme anterior and posterior ends of the corpus callosum. b Comparison of factor scores by anatomical regions 1-6, with the factor scores interpreted as a positive value representing relative thickening of that region of the corpus callosum in children with hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury, and negative values indicating a relative narrowing. The factors corresponding to the extreme ends of the corpus callosum are not shown. Region 4, P < 0.01; region 1, P < 0.05. c A tractography image from a diffusion tensor imaging study in a normal adult shows that the commissural tracts implicated in the focal injury originate in the paracentral lobules
Results of analysis of variance between the patient groups using as factors anatomical regions (rostral to dorsal) of the corpus callosum, as illustrated in Fig. 3
| Factors (regions of the corpus callosum) |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Factor 1* (genu of the corpus callosum) | 7.728 | 0.011 |
| Factor 2 | 1.201 | 0.29 |
| Factor 3 | 0.057 | 0.81 |
| Factor 4* (mid to posterior body of the corpus callosum) | 12.64 | 0.0019 |
| Factor 5 | 0.7364 | 0.40 |
| Factor 6 | 2.014 | 0.17 |
* Note that only in factors 1 (genu) and 4 (mid- to posterior body) is F higher than the critical value of 4.35 and hence the null hypothesis can be rejected: in these regions the difference in widths was not caused by chance variation alone
Results of corpus callosum width centile support vector machine analysis between the patient groups; the results are established metrics for the assessment of machine learning experiments where tp = true positive, fp = false positive and fn = false negative
| Precisiona | Recallb | F-measurec | AUCd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIE group | 1 | 0.909 | 0.952 | 0.955 |
| Control group | 0.917 | 1 | 0.957 | 0.955 |
aPrecision = tp/tp + fp
bRecall = tp/tp + fn
cF-measure, a measure of classification performance, = 2 × precision × recall/precision + recall
dAUC (area under the curve) value refers to the receiver operating characteristic curves (Fig. 4)
HIE hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy
Fig. 4Support vector machine stratification performed on the imaging dataset for each participant with classification into one of two groups: (1) hypoxic–ischaemic brain injury (HIBI) or (2) developmental delay control. Receiver operator characteristics curves of classification (correct classification = true positive) into either the hypoxic–ischaemic brain injury group or the control group. The receiver operating characteristic curve pertaining to the stratification into each group is shown here with the associated analysis data (Table 3). Note the high degree of stratification, with an area under the curve of over 95% relating to both groups. This demonstrates the power of this technique when applied to this particular imaging metric. As such it points towards such callosal analysis in translational clinical and academic applications