| Literature DB >> 26403574 |
Shanmugaraja Meenakshi1, M Hussain Munavar1.
Abstract
Analyses of mutations in genes coding for subunits of RNA polymerase always throw more light on the intricate events that regulate the expression of gene(s). Lon protease of Escherichia coli is implicated in the turnover of RcsA (positive regulator of genes involved in capsular polysaccharide synthesis) and SulA (cell division inhibitor induced upon DNA damage). Failure to degrade RcsA and SulA makes lon mutant cells to overproduce capsular polysaccharides and to become sensitive to DNA damaging agents. Earlier reports on suppressors for these characteristic lon phenotypes related the role of cochaperon DnaJ and tmRNA. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of two novel mutations in rpoB gene capable of modulating the expression of cps genes in Δlon strains of E. coli in concert with HNS. clpA, clpB, clpY, and clpQ mutations do not affect this capsule expression suppressor (Ces) phenotype. These mutant RNA polymerases affect rcsA transcription, but per se are not defective either at rcsA or at cps promoters. The results combined with bioinformatics analyses indicate that the weaker interaction between the enzyme and DNA::RNA hybrid during transcription might play a vital role in the lower level expression of rcsA. These results might have relevance to pathogenesis in related bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: Ces; HNS; rcsA; rpoB; Δlon
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26403574 PMCID: PMC4618605 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.268
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiologyopen ISSN: 2045-8827 Impact factor: 3.139
List of Escherichia coli strains, phages, plasmids, and primers used in this study
| Strain | Relevant genotype | Source/reference/construction |
|---|---|---|
| SG20780 | F−
| S. Gottesman, NIH, USA |
| SG20781 | F−
| S. Gottesman, NIH, USA |
| CAG18618 | F−
| Lab Collection |
| HR318 | F−
| R. Harinarayanan, CDFD, India |
| HR318K | Same as HR318 but has | This Study |
| MMR6 | Same as SG20780 but has | This Study |
| MMR23 | Same as SG20780 but has | This Study |
| MMR8 | Same as SG20780 but has | This Study |
| KL226 | HfrC | Laboratory Collection |
| SMM12 | Same as KL226 but has | This Study |
| SMM23 | Same as KL226 but has | This Study |
| SMM8 | Same as KL226 but has | This Study |
| AB1157 | F−
| Laboratory Collection |
| DM49 | Same as AB1157 but has | Laboratory Collection |
| DM49RN | Same as DM49 but has | Shanmughapriya and Munavar ( |
| SM49AK | Same as DM49RN but has | Shanmugapriya ( |
| SM49BK | Same as DM49RN but has | Shanmugapriya ( |
| SM49QC | Same as DM49RN but has | Shanmugapriya ( |
| SM49YC | Same as DM49RN but has | Shanmugapriya ( |
| MMR6A | Same as MMR6 but has | This Study |
| MMR6B | Same as MMR6 but has | This Study |
| MMR6Q | Same as MMR6 but has | This Study |
| MMR6Y | Same as MMR6 but has | This Study |
| MMR23A | Same as MMR23 but has | This Study |
| MMR23B | Same as MMR23 but has | This Study |
| MMR23Q | Same as MMR23 but has | This Study |
| MMR23Y | Same as MMR23 but has | This Study |
| SMM780A | Same as SG20780 but has | This Study |
| SMM780B | Same as SG20780 but has | This Study |
| SMM780Q | Same as SG20780 but has | This Study |
| SMM780Y | Same as SG20780 but has | This Study |
| SMM781A | Same as SG20781 but has | This Study |
| W3110 | F− | Laboratory Collection |
| ZK819 | Same as W3110 but has | S. Mahadevan, IISc,India |
| SMM780H | Same as SG20780 but has | This Study |
| SMM781H | Same as SG20781 but has | This Study |
| MMR6H | Same as MMR6 but has | This Study |
| MMR23H | Same as MMR23 but has | This Study |
| SMM780R | Same as SG20780 but bearing pHYD535 | This Study |
| SMM781R | Same as SG20781 but bearing pHYD535 | This Study |
| MMR6R | Same as MMR6 but bearing pHYD535 | This Study |
| MMR23R | Same as MMR23 but bearing pHYD535 | This Study |
| SMM780RC | Same as SG20780 but bearing pCL1920 | This Study |
| SMM781RC | Same as SG20781 but bearing pCL1920 | This Study |
| MMR6RC | Same as MMR6 but bearing pCL1920 | This Study |
| MMR23RC | Same as MMR23 but bearing pCL1920 | This Study |
| SMM780T | Same as SG20780 but bearing p | This Study |
| SMM781T | Same as SG20781 but bearing p | This Study |
| MMR6T | Same as MMR6 but bearing p | This Study |
| MMR23T | Same as MMR23 but bearing p | This Study |
| SMM780TC | Same as SG20780 but bearing pKK232-8 | This Study |
| SMM781TC | Same as SG20781 but bearing pKK232-8 | This Study |
| MMR6TC | Same as MMR6 but bearing pKK232-8 | This Study |
| MMR23TC | Same as MMR23 but bearing pKK232-8 | This Study |
Figure 1Pictures of the petri plates showing the Cps::Lac+/− phenotype due to different levels of expression of cps::lac fusion in relevant strains. (A) Growth of lon cps::lac (SG20780) lon cps::lac (SG20781), MMR6 (lon cps::lac rpoB12), and MMR23 (lon cps::lac rpoB77) strains. Appropriate dilutions of cells were plated on relevant minimal agar plates containing X-gal (20 μg/mL) and pictures were taken after ∼36 h of incubation at 30°C. (B) Growth of strains as indicated in (A) bearing the rpoBC+ clone (pHYD535) and the control plasmid vector (pCL1920). Cells were pated on similar minimal agar plates but Spectinomycin (50 μg/mL) and IPTG (1 mmol/L) were added as the plasmid confers SpecR phenotype and the rpoBC+ is cloned under lac promoter. Pictures were taken as in (A). The presence of rpoBC+ clone did not change the cps::lac phenotype of any strain indicating the dominant nature of both rif alleles. (C) Growth indicating the Cps::Lac phenotype of the strains as indicated in (A) (SG20780, SG20781, MMR6, and MMR23) bearing clpA::kan insertion. The cells were plated on relevant minimal agar plates containing Kanamycin (50 μg/mL) and X-gal (20 μg/mL).The pictures were taken after ∼44 h incubation at 30°C as the growth rate of clpA::kan derivatives was less compared to that of the original strains. (D) Growth indicating the Cps::Lac phenotype of the strains (SG20780, SG20781, MMR6, and MMR23) as indicated in (A) bearing hns::kan insertion. The cells were streaked on LB plates containing Kanamycin (50 μg/mL) and X-gal (40 μg/mL) as the hns::kan derivatives were relatively very slow grower in minimal agar plates. The pictures were taken after ∼30 h incubation at 30°C.
Figure 2Determination of Termination efficiency of rpoB mutants by sequential spotting analyses of relevant strains. The overnight cultures of the relevant strains were serially diluted and relevant dilutions were spotted on LB Agar plates with Ampicillin (100 μg/mL) as well as on LB plates with Ampicillin (100 μg/mL), Chloramphenicol (100 μg/mL), and IPTG (1 mmol/L). The plates were incubated at least for ∼24 h at 30°C. The ability of relevant strains with appropriate clone to grow both in Ampicillin and Chloramphenicol plates is the indication of fast movement of the RNAP of the relevant strain (transcription past terminator). KL226 is the WT strain, whereas SMM12, SMM77, and SMM8 are the rpoB12, rpoB77, and rpoB8 derivatives of KL226. The fast movement for ces12 is evident from the picture.
Figure 3Quantification of cps::lac/lac operon expression through β-galactosidase assay in relevant strains. (A) Level of cps::lac expression in rpoB mutants along with the lon− and lon+ controls, SG20780 and SG20781, respectively. (B) Effect of clpA,clpB, clpQ, and clpY mutations on the cps::lac expression in Δlon rpoB mutants. (C) Effect of hns::kan mutation in modulation of capsule expression in rpoB mutants. (D) Level of IPTG induced β-galactosidase expression from lac operon in relevant strains. In each case the values given are the average of three independent experiments with standard error mean. Whenever the β-galactosidase assay for cps::lac expression was perofrmed, the lon− and lon+ strains were taken as controls. Therefore, the values given for the parental strains (lon− and lon+) are the average of more than three experiments (for more details see text).
Figure 4RT-PCR-based transcription profile of indicated genes and densitometry analysis of the gel pictures. (A) Transcription profile of cpsB gene in rpoB mutants with SG20780 (lon−) and SG20781 (lon+) as controls. (B) Transcription profile of house-keeping genes namely rpsG and dnaE in KL226 (WT), SMM12 (rpoB12), and SMM77 (rpoB77) strains. (C) Transcription profile of rcsA in rpoB mutants with the respective controls. In each case, 1 μg of total RNA was used for RT-PCR and gel picture given for each case is the representative of three independent experiments. Shown in the side is the densitometry analysis of the respective gel pictures.
Figure 5The cps::lac expression in relevant strains after the introduction of multicopy rcsA+ clone. (A) Effect of multicopy rcsA allele in the modulation of cps::lac expression in rpoB mutants along with the parental strains. The values given are the average of three independent experiments with standard error mean. (B) Growth indicating the Cps::Lac phenotype of the relevant strains (SG20780, SG20781, MMR6, and MMR23) bearing rcsA clone. The cells were streaked on LB agar plates containing Streptomycin (100 μg/mL), Ampicillin (100 μg/mL), and X-gal (40 μg/mL). The pictures were taken after ∼36 h incubation at 30°C.
Figure 6The bioinformatics analyses to predict the bending and curving abilities of relevant genes. The freely available software Bend.it was used to analyze the bending or curving ability of the upstream sequences of the relevant genes. (A) rcsA (B) dnaE and (C) rpsG. The red color indicates the curving ability, whereas the green color indicates the bending ability (refer text for more details).
Figure 7The structural analyses of mutant RpoB region of the rpoB mutants. Comparison of RpoB region (residues 507–563) from the mutant MMR6 (His526 to Tyr526) with that of wild type. (A) Comparison of RpoB region (residues 507–563) from the mutant MMR23 (Ser512 to Tyr512) with that of wild type. (B) Interaction of RpoB region from the MMR6 mutant (residues 385–425 in Thermus thermophilus) with the template DNA–RNA hybrid. (C) Interaction of RpoB region from the MMR23 mutant (residues 385–425 in T. thermophilus) with the template DNA–RNA hybrid. The structural prediction was made with PYMOL software. By taking the available structures in PDB (ID 2O5J and 4IGC) as template, we modeled and predicted the possible differences in the interaction with the DNA–RNA hybrid compared to the wild type. In the case of (A and B), the relevant residues are shown in red color and the yellow dotted line indicates the polar interactions with nearby residues. In the case of (C and D), the orange color represents the β-subunit (residues 385–425 of T. thermophilus, the position in Escherichia coli for the relevant residue is given in brackets). Cyan represents DNA, whereas gray represents RNA (refer text for more details).