N Martinez-Carranza1, L Ryd2, K Hultenby3, H Hedlund4, H Nurmi-Sandh5, A S Lagerstedt5, P Schupbach6, H E Berg4. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Institution of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: nicolas.martinez-carranza@karolinska.se. 2. Episurf Medical AB, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Division of Clinical Research Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Institution of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala, Sweden. 6. Schupbach Ltd, Service and Research Laboratory for Histology, Electron Microscopy and Micro CT, Horgen, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Full depth focal cartilage lesions do not heal spontaneously and while some of these lesions are asymptomatic they might progress to osteoarthritis. Treatment for these lesions is warranted and the gold standard treatment at younger age remains biological healing by cell stimulation. In the middle-age patient the success rate of biologic treatment varies, hence the surge of non-biological alternatives. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a metallic implant for treatment of these lesions with respect to the long-term panarticular cartilage homeostasis. METHODS: The medial femoral condyle of 16 sheep was operated unilaterally. A metallic implant was inserted in the weight-bearing surface at an aimed height of 0.5 mm recessed. Euthanasia was performed at 6 or 12 months. Implant height and tilt was analyzed using a laser-scanning device. Damage to cartilage surfaces was evaluated macroscopically and microscopically according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) recommendations. RESULTS: Thirteen sheep were available for evaluation and showed a varying degree of cartilage damage linearly increasing with age. Cartilage damage of the medial tibial plateau opposing the implant was increased compared to the non-operated knee by 1.77 units (p = 0.041; 95% CI: 0.08, 3.45) on a 0-27 unit scale. Remaining joint compartments were unaffected. Implant position averaged 0.54 recessed (95% CI: 0.41, 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a consistent and accurate placement of these implants at a defined zone. At this position cartilage wear of opposing and surrounding joint cartilage is limited. Thus expanded animal and human studies are motivated.
BACKGROUND: Full depth focal cartilage lesions do not heal spontaneously and while some of these lesions are asymptomatic they might progress to osteoarthritis. Treatment for these lesions is warranted and the gold standard treatment at younger age remains biological healing by cell stimulation. In the middle-age patient the success rate of biologic treatment varies, hence the surge of non-biological alternatives. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a metallic implant for treatment of these lesions with respect to the long-term panarticular cartilage homeostasis. METHODS: The medial femoral condyle of 16 sheep was operated unilaterally. A metallic implant was inserted in the weight-bearing surface at an aimed height of 0.5 mm recessed. Euthanasia was performed at 6 or 12 months. Implant height and tilt was analyzed using a laser-scanning device. Damage to cartilage surfaces was evaluated macroscopically and microscopically according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) recommendations. RESULTS: Thirteen sheep were available for evaluation and showed a varying degree of cartilage damage linearly increasing with age. Cartilage damage of the medial tibial plateau opposing the implant was increased compared to the non-operated knee by 1.77 units (p = 0.041; 95% CI: 0.08, 3.45) on a 0-27 unit scale. Remaining joint compartments were unaffected. Implant position averaged 0.54 recessed (95% CI: 0.41, 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a consistent and accurate placement of these implants at a defined zone. At this position cartilage wear of opposing and surrounding joint cartilage is limited. Thus expanded animal and human studies are motivated.
Authors: Nicolas Martinez-Carranza; Kjell Hultenby; Anne Sofie Lagerstedt; Peter Schupbach; Hans E Berg Journal: Cartilage Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Andrzej Brzezinski; Salim A Ghodbane; Jay M Patel; Barbara A Perry; Charles J Gatt; Michael G Dunn Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Nicolas Martinez-Carranza; Peter Rockborn; David Roberts; Magnus Högström; Anders Stålman Journal: Cartilage Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Lianne Zevenbergen; Colin R Smith; Sam Van Rossom; Darryl G Thelen; Nele Famaey; Jos Vander Sloten; Ilse Jonkers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Theresa Diermeier; Arne Venjakob; Kevin Byrne; Rainer Burgkart; Peter Foehr; Stefan Milz; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 2.362