Literature DB >> 26402593

Local release of masitinib alters in vivo implantable continuous glucose sensor performance.

M Avula1, D Jones2, A N Rao3, D McClain2, L D McGill4, D W Grainger5, F Solzbacher6.   

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors are often advocated as a clinical solution to improve long-term glycemic control in the context of diabetes. Subcutaneous sensor inflammatory response, fouling and fibrous encapsulation resulting from the host foreign body response (FBR) reduce sensor sensitivity to glucose, eventually resulting in sensor performance compromise and device failure. Several combination device strategies load CGM sensors with drug payloads that release locally to tissue sites to mitigate FBR-mediated sensor failure. In this study, the mast cell-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor, masitinib, was released from degradable polymer microspheres delivered from the surfaces of FDA-approved human commercial CGM needle-type implanted sensors in a rodent subcutaneous test bed. By targeting the mast cell c-Kit receptor and inhibiting mast cell activation and degranulation, local masitinib penetration around the CGM to several hundred microns sought to reduce sensor fibrosis to extend CGM functional lifetimes in subcutaneous sites. Drug-releasing and control CGM implants were compared in murine percutaneous implant sites for 21 days using direct-wire continuous glucose reporting. Drug-releasing implants exhibited no significant difference in CGM fibrosis at implant sites but showed relatively stable continuous sensor responses over the study period compared to blank microsphere control CGM implants.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Encapsulation; Foreign body response (FBR); Local drug delivery; Mast cells (MC); Subcutaneous murine implants; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26402593     DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.08.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron        ISSN: 0956-5663            Impact factor:   10.618


  7 in total

Review 1.  In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jackson R Hall; Micah D Brown; James B Taylor; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Impact of CCL2 and CCR2 chemokine/receptor deficiencies on macrophage recruitment and continuous glucose monitoring in vivo.

Authors:  Ulrike Klueh; Caroline Czajkowski; Izabela Ludzinska; Yi Qiao; Jackman Frailey; Donald L Kreutzer
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 3.  Biocompatibility Evolves: Phenomenology to Toxicology to Regeneration.

Authors:  Lars Crawford; Meghan Wyatt; James Bryers; Buddy Ratner
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 11.092

Review 4.  Modulating the foreign body response of implants for diabetes treatment.

Authors:  Bhushan N Kharbikar; Gauree S Chendke; Tejal A Desai
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 17.873

Review 5.  Current and Emerging Technology for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Xue-Ling Zhao; Zhan-Hong Li; Zhi-Gang Zhu; Shao-Hong Qian; Andrew J Flewitt
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Monitoring with In Vivo Electrochemical Sensors: Navigating the Complexities of Blood and Tissue Reactivity.

Authors:  Pankaj Vadgama
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Fibrotic Encapsulation Is the Dominant Source of Continuous Glucose Monitor Delays.

Authors:  P Mason McClatchey; Ethan S McClain; Ian M Williams; Carlo M Malabanan; Freyja D James; Peter C Lord; Justin M Gregory; David E Cliffel; David H Wasserman
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 9.461

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.