Literature DB >> 26402476

Young Adults Largely Depend on Vision for Postural Control When Standing on a BOSU Ball but Not on Foam.

Anat Lubetzky-Vilnai1, Sarah W McCoy, Robert Price, Marcia A Ciol.   

Abstract

What happens at the sensory level when a person is balancing on compliant surfaces? Compliant surfaces such as both-sides-up (BOSU) balls are often used as a form of "proprioceptive exercises." Clinical theories in neurorehabilitation suggest that compliant surfaces disrupt the somatosensory contribution to balance and increase reliance on vision and vestibular input. Understanding the sensory aspects of compliant surfaces' exercises would have important implications for balance training of athletes and of people with somatosensory deficits such as people with recurrent ankle sprains. We tested this clinical theory in a sample of 30 healthy young adults and 10 adults with a history of repeated ankle sprains while they were standing on a BOSU ball, memory foam, or floor. We measured participants' center of pressure response to dots projected on a screen, moving mediolaterally at one of the 3 frequencies (0.4, 0.48, and 0.56 Hz). We calculated magnitude of the postural response (gains) and participants' primary frequency (PF) of sway and compared it between surfaces per frequency. In both groups, gains were significantly higher on the BOSU compared with floor or foam (p < 0.001) with no significant difference between floor and foam. The PF difference was significant (p < 0.001) with a clear peak matching of the visual stimulation frequency only on the BOSU. During a single session of stance on compliant surfaces, visual dependence was a dominant factor on a challenging condition. When prescribing BOSU exercises to young adults as specific balance training, trainers should consider its effect on increased visual dependence with respect to that session's goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26402476     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

Review 1.  Balance Training Does Not Alter Reliance on Visual Information during Static Stance in Those with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kyeongtak Song; Evan Rhodes; Erik A Wikstrom
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Response to Tendon Vibration Questions the Underlying Rationale of Proprioceptive Training.

Authors:  Anat Vilnai Lubetzky; Sarah Westcott McCoy; Robert Price; Deborah Kartin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Postural Balance in Relation with Vision and Physical Activity in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Roxana Ramona Onofrei; Elena Amaricai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  BALANCE TRAINING: DOES ANTICIPATED BALANCE CONFIDENCE CORRELATE WITH ACTUAL BALANCE CONFIDENCE FOR DIFFERENT UNSTABLE OBJECTS?

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Gioella Chaparro; Morey J Kolber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12

5.  No Difference in the Acute Effects of Randomization vs. Blocking of Units of Lower-Extremity Proprioceptive Training on Balance and Postural Control in Young Healthy Male Adults.

Authors:  Patrik Ivusza; Tibor Hortobágyi; Balázs Sebesi; Balázs Gáspár; Ádám Fésüs; Mátyás Varga; Vanessza Malmos; Márk Váczi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.755

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.