BACKGROUND: The NINDS trial demonstrated the efficacy of intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) in improving the neurologic outcome in patients presenting with acute ischemic strokes. Patients who had a prior history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were excluded from this trial, possibly due to a hypothetical increase in the subsequent bleeding risk. Thus, there is little data available, whether against or in favor of, the use of IV rtPA in patients with prior ICH. We aim to aid in determining the safety of IV rtPA in such patients through a retrospective hospital-based single center study. METHODS: We reviewed the brain imaging of all patients who received IV rtPA at our comprehensive stroke center from January 2006 to April 2014 for evidence of prior ICH at the time of IV rtPA administration. Their outcomes were determined in terms of subsequent development of symptomatic ICH as defined by the NINDS trial. RESULTS: Brain imaging for 640 patients was reviewed. A total of 27 patients showed evidence of prior ICH at the time of IV thrombolysis, all intra-parenchymal. Only 1 patient (3.7%) developed subsequent symptomatic ICH after the administration of IV rtPA. Of the remaining 613 patients who received IV rtPA, 25 patients (4.1%) developed symptomatic ICH. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study provides Level C evidence that patients with imaging evidence of prior asymptomatic intra-parenchymal hemorrhage presenting with an acute ischemic stroke do not show an increased risk of developing symptomatic ICH after IV thrombolysis.
BACKGROUND: The NINDS trial demonstrated the efficacy of intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) in improving the neurologic outcome in patients presenting with acute ischemic strokes. Patients who had a prior history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were excluded from this trial, possibly due to a hypothetical increase in the subsequent bleeding risk. Thus, there is little data available, whether against or in favor of, the use of IV rtPA in patients with prior ICH. We aim to aid in determining the safety of IV rtPA in such patients through a retrospective hospital-based single center study. METHODS: We reviewed the brain imaging of all patients who received IV rtPA at our comprehensive stroke center from January 2006 to April 2014 for evidence of prior ICH at the time of IV rtPA administration. Their outcomes were determined in terms of subsequent development of symptomatic ICH as defined by the NINDS trial. RESULTS: Brain imaging for 640 patients was reviewed. A total of 27 patients showed evidence of prior ICH at the time of IV thrombolysis, all intra-parenchymal. Only 1 patient (3.7%) developed subsequent symptomatic ICH after the administration of IV rtPA. Of the remaining 613 patients who received IV rtPA, 25 patients (4.1%) developed symptomatic ICH. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study provides Level C evidence that patients with imaging evidence of prior asymptomatic intra-parenchymal hemorrhage presenting with an acute ischemic stroke do not show an increased risk of developing symptomatic ICH after IV thrombolysis.
Authors: Muhammad K Ahmed; Haris Kamal; Jessica L Weiss; Annemarie Crumlish; Peyman Shirani; Robert N Sawyer; Ashkan Mowla Journal: Brain Circ Date: 2021-05-29