Literature DB >> 264015

Cognitive factors affecting sequential dependencies in differential eyelid conditioning.

J A Kadlac.   

Abstract

Sequential dependencies were examined as a function of learning, masking, and subject factors in a two-stage differential eyelid conditioning experiment. In Stage 1, all subjects were differentially conditioned to two Vanderplas and Garvin (1959) forms. In Stage 2, the conditional stimuli (CSs) were one of eight words, four reinforced (CS+) and four unreinforced (CS-), with taxonomic category (animals vs. musical instruments) as the discriminandum, and different subjects were given semantic, physical, or no additional CS processing tasks. The results showed sizeable and highly significant sequential dependencies in the form of greater conditional response probabilities when CS+ as opposed to CS- trials were recently experienced. These effects decreased over trials, were greater in the groups given additional processing loads, and were in some cases greater in C-form responders than in V-form responders and greater in subjects who were unable to verbalize the differential contingencies. It was concluded that the magnitude of sequential dependencies was inversely related to the subject's awareness of the differential contingencies and/or ability to use the contingency information to respond appropriately to the CS cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 264015     DOI: 10.1007/bf03001981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci        ISSN: 0093-2213


  9 in total

1.  The association value of random shapes.

Authors:  J M VANDERPLAS; E A GARVIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-03

2.  An alternative criterion for the elimination of "voluntary" responses in eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  T F HARTMAN; L E ROSS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-04

3.  Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye.

Authors:  A Paivio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-11

4.  Effects of nonrandom intermittent reinforcement schedules in human-eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  W F Prokasy; R A Carlton; J D Higgins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-06

5.  Eyelid response topography in differential interstimulus interval conditioning.

Authors:  J A Kadlac; D A Grant
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1977-05

Review 6.  Cognitive factors in eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  D A Grant
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Response topography in the acquisition of differential eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  M J Zajano; D A Grant
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-12

8.  Effects of masking tasks on differential eyelid conditioning: a distinction between knowledge of stimulus contingencies and attentional or cognitive activities involving them.

Authors:  M N Nelson; L E Ross
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-01

9.  Instructional sets in human differential eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  W F Prokasy; C K Allen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-05
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  A pitfall for the expectancy theory of human eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  P Perruchet
Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci       Date:  1985 Oct-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.