Literature DB >> 26401279

Perioperative considerations in Walker-Warburg syndrome.

Madelous Ja Valk1, Stephan A Loer1, Patrick Schober1, Saskia Dettwiler1.   

Abstract

Walker-Warburg syndrome is a rare congenital disorder. Several features, including muscular dystrophy, hydrocephalus, and oropharyngeal abnormalities, have important implications in the perioperative setting. We present a case of general anesthesia in an infant and discuss perioperative considerations to guide clinicians faced with the management of patients with this syndrome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Walker–Warburg syndrome; hydrocephalus; muscular dystrophy; ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Year:  2015        PMID: 26401279      PMCID: PMC4574790          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


Introduction

Walker–Warburg syndrome (WWS) is a rare congenital disorder, characterized by muscular dystrophy combined with brain and eye abnormalities and other facultative malformations 1. Perioperative management is challenging but has only scarcely been reported in the literature 2. Muscular dystrophy might be associated with malignant hyperthermia (MH) or rhabdomyolysis and may cause postoperative respiratory complications. Patients may present with a difficult airway (i.e., difficulties to perform mask ventilation and tracheal intubation after induction of anesthesia) due to orofacial malformations. Other perioperative problems include increases in intracranial pressure in patients with hydrocephalus. Delayed gastric emptying as well as an increased risk for apnea and seizures have also been described in this patient category. We present a case of general anesthesia in an infant with WWS. Best practice of perioperative management yet has to be established for such patients. Leading textbooks on general anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, and perioperative medicine completely lack information on WWS 3–7. We therefore discuss perioperative considerations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with this rare but challenging syndrome. Both parents of the patient gave written consent to publish the case and photographs.

Case History

A 29-days-old male infant of consanguineous parents weighing 2860 g was scheduled for placement of a ventriculoperitoneal drain due to increasing hydrocephalus. The child had been delivered by cesarean section due to fetal distress at a gestational age of 36 + 2 weeks. He was immediately admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit because of respiratory insufficiency, which was treated with continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Moreover, congenital hypothyroidism was noted and hormone replacement therapy was initiated. Preoperative physical examination showed macrocephaly, microphthalmia, cataract of the left eye, and glaucoma of both eyes, a small mouth, retrognathia, low-set malformed ears, and a large anterior fontanel (Fig.1A). The child had very little to no muscle tone, and the grasp reflex was absent. Blood pressure was 91/54 mmHg, pulse rate was 140 beats per minute and oxygen saturation was 100%. An electrocardiograph and chest X-ray were normal.
Figure 1

Postoperative photograph of the infant with retrognathia and low-set ears (panel A), as well as sagittal (panel B) and axial (panel C) magnetic resonance images showing massively dilated ventricles (preoperative situation).

Postoperative photograph of the infant with retrognathia and low-set ears (panel A), as well as sagittal (panel B) and axial (panel C) magnetic resonance images showing massively dilated ventricles (preoperative situation). Laboratory investigation showed no abnormalities for parameters of renal function, hemoglobin, serum electrolyte levels, and blood glucose. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head (Fig.1B/C) showed typical characteristics of WWS such as dilated ventricles, hydrocephalus, cerebellar hypoplasia, agenesis of the corpus callosum, cobblestone lissencephaly, a buphthalmos of the right eye and a persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous of the left eye. Electroencephalography showed moderate atypical cortical activity but no signs of convulsions.

Perioperative Treatment and Outcome

Preoperatively, the child was fasted for 4 h and received no sedative premedication. Pulse oximetry, ECG and noninvasive blood pressure monitoring were attached on arrival in the operating room. Difficult airway equipment was prepared, including an infant gum elastic bougie, Guedel oropharyngeal airway devices (size 00 and 0), a laryngeal mask airway device (size 1), as well as a video laryngoscope (Glidescope, Verathon Inc., Bothell, WA, USA). General anesthesia was induced with ∼6% sevoflurane in oxygen using a facemask. After assuring that mask ventilation was possible, fentanyl (2 μg kg−1), propofol (1 mg kg−1), and atracurium (0.7 mg kg−1) were administered intravenously. Laryngoscopy was performed using a straight Miller blade (size 1) with gentile backward pressure on the larynx, allowing direct visualization of the vocal cords. A cuffed tracheal tube (size 3) was passed through the nose and the trachea was intubated. Correct placement of the tracheal tube was confirmed by capnography and auscultation of both lungs. After intubation, sevoflurane administration was discontinued and anesthesia was maintained intravenously with intermittent doses of fentanyl (3–5 μg kg−1), midazolam 0.1 mg kg−1) and s-ketamine (1 mg kg−1). The patient was mechanically ventilated using volume-controlled ventilation mode with a tidal volume of 6–8 ml kg−1, a respiratory rate adjusted to maintain normocapnia and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 mbar. A balanced electrolyte solution was used to correct preoperative fluid deficit and for maintenance. Body temperature was continuously monitored via a rectal temperature probe. The surgical procedure was uneventfully completed after 42 min. At the end of surgery, the child was left sedated and transferred to the pediatric intensive care unit where he was extubated the same day a few hours later. Aside from occasional short episodes of hypopnea/apnea with decreases in oxygen saturation (to 80%), the postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was transferred to the general pediatric ward on the first postoperative day and was discharged home 5 days after the operation.

Discussion

Walker–Warburg syndrome is a genetically heterogeneous autosomal recessive disorder. The incidence is unknown but has been estimated to be 1.2/100,000 live births in Italy 8. Its pathophysiology is not entirely understood, but involves defects in the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex 9. Walker–Warburg syndrome is considered the most severe type of congenital muscular dystrophy (CMD) and most of the affected children die before the age of three years 9. Common features include a cobblestone lissencephaly, cerebellar malformations, ventricular enlargement with hydrocephalus, as well as retinal and anterior chamber malformations 1. Facial and oropharyngeal abnormalities such as micrognathia, small mouth opening, cleft lip and cleft palate have also regularly been observed. Clinical features of WWS are summarized in Table1.
Table 1

Clinical features of Walker–Warburg syndrome (WWS)

Common features
 Congenital muscular dystrophy
 Cobblestone (or type II) lissencephaly
 Cerebellar malformation
 Ventricular enlargement
 Hydrocephalus
 Retinal malformation
 Anterior chamber malformation
Facultative features
 Micrognathia / retrognathia
 Cleft lip and cleft palate
 Glaucoma, cataract, microphthalmia, and colobomas
 Encephalocele
 Dandy–Walker malformation
 Low-set malformed ears
 Contractures
 Cryptorchidism, small penis and testis
 Hydronephrosis
Possible association with WWS
 Central and obstructive apnea
 Seizures
 Delayed gastric emptying
Clinical features of Walker–Warburg syndrome (WWS) Several of the features pose a unique challenge to anesthesiologists and increase the risk for complications in the perioperative period. A thorough knowledge of the patient's medical condition is crucial to allow adequate planning of any anesthesia procedure, and this is especially true in infants with complex syndromes like WWS. Planning should address preoperative requirements for sedative premedication and fasting, anticipation of problems during induction, maintenance and emergence of anesthesia, as well as precautions to avoid complications in the postoperative period. Concerns about an increased risk for central and obstructive apnea prompted us to avoid preoperative sedation in this child with severe neurologic impairment and muscular hypotonia 2,10. Regarding preoperative fasting requirements, a previous publication suggested that WWS might be associated with reduced gastrointestinal motility and an increased risk for pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents 10. We were unable to verify this information in the cited original literature 11,12, but our patient indeed showed signs of gastric retention and gastroesophageal reflux shortly after birth. Since gastric retention had resolved by the time of the operation, and since prolonged fasting times in neonates are associated with hypoglycemia and hypovolemia, we determined that a standard fasting period was sufficient. However, clinicians should be aware of a possible association between WWS and delayed gastric emptying and should individually determine preoperative fasting requirements. During induction of anesthesia, we faced two problems: a potential association of CMD with MH and a potentially difficult airway. Associations of MH with CMD, or other myopathies have repeatedly been suggested but are only poorly established 13. There have been no reports of MH in patients with WWS, but nonetheless such an association cannot be excluded. Moreover, rhabdomyolysis or unspecific hypermetabolic responses triggered by volatile anesthetics (such as sevoflurane) or succinylcholine have been described in a variety of myopathies 13. Hence, it may be safest to avoid triggering substances. However, in our patient, a small mouth opening and retrognathia suggested that airway management might be difficult. We therefore determined that an inhalation induction with sevoflurane is the safest approach to maintain spontaneous ventilation until we could establish adequate mask ventilation. Sevoflurane is the only volatile anesthetic on the market that does neither have airway irritant effects nor a pungent odor, and is therefore currently the only available volatile anesthetic that is suitable for inhalation induction. As soon as manual ventilation turned out to be appropriate, a muscle relaxant was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. In this context, succinylcholine as a potential trigger of MH, rhabdomyolysis or massive potassium release in myopathic muscles was avoided. We used atracurium instead, and subsequent intubation was uneventful. After confirmation of tube positioning, sevoflurane was discontinued and anesthesia was maintained with total intravenous anesthesia. During induction and maintenance of anesthesia, the patient was meticulously monitored for signs of MH or rhabdomyolysis, such as tachycardia, arrhythmias or muscle rigidity. Specifically, we monitored endtidal CO2 partial pressure by continuous capnography, because excessive CO2 production and marked hypercapnia is a sensitive early sign of MH 14. After placement of the rectal temperature probe, we also monitored the patient for hyperthermia. The ECG was observed for signs of hyperkalemia, such as tall peaked T waves, widening of the QRS complex, or arrhythmias, which may occur as a result of MH or rhabdomyolysis. In the absence of any signs of MH or rhabdomyolysis, specific laboratory testing or arterial blood gas analyses were not performed. Intraoperative management should also address other comorbidities. In particular, patients with WWS commonly present with hydrocephalus and are at risk of developing increased intracranial pressures (ICP). To avoid any increases in ICP by coughing on the endotracheal tube, we paralyzed the patient. Subsequent ventilation targeted at normocapnia to avoid increases in ICP by hypercapnic cerebral vasodilation. Maintenance of anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and s-ketamine resulted in stable hemodynamics, avoiding arterial hypotension and impairments in cerebral perfusion pressure. Patients with WWS may develop postoperative respiratory complications due to muscular weakness and have an increased risk for seizures 9. Patients should be transferred to a postoperative care unit capable of providing advanced pediatric life support. We transferred the intubated and sedated patient to the pediatric intensive care ward to allow gradual weaning from mechanical ventilation and to ensure that neuromuscular blocking effects of atracurium were completely abolished before extubation. After extubation, the patient received 30% oxygen through a nasal cannula. He showed several short incidents of hypopnea/apnea with drops in oxygen saturation to 80%, underlining that children with WWS need to be closely monitored in the postoperative period. To our knowledge, only one previous report has described a case of general anesthesia in a patient with typical WWS 2. The authors describe major difficulties in visualizing laryngeal structures during laryngoscopy using two different techniques, and eventually performed blind endotracheal intubation. This supports our approach of maintaining spontaneous breathing until adequate mask ventilation is established, and underlines the need to be well prepared for difficult airway management. A second report described a patient with possible WWS who also presented with a difficult airway 10. However, this patient did not have CMD, which is considered a cornerstone in the diagnosis of WWS 1. One case series15 and one case report16 describe general anesthesia in patients with muscle-eye-brain (MEB) disease. While this disease shares many characteristics with WWS, most authors consider WWS and MEB as two distinct entities 17–19. Yet, due to its similarity, these reports may be of interest in the context of WWS. The case series describes a marked increase in creatine kinase activity after administration of succinylcholine and concludes that this drug should be avoided 15. The case report describes anesthesia in a child with difficult airway in whom the authors completely avoided volatile anesthetics and secured the airway with fiberoptic intubation 16. In summary, we describe successful perioperative management of an infant with typical WWS, which may help to guide other clinicians in similar circumstances. Preoperative fasting requirements and the need for sedating premedication should be determined individually in the context of potentially delayed gastric emptying and an increased risk of apnea. Patients should be evaluated for the presence of a difficult airway, and specialized equipment and expertise to handle difficulties should be readily available. A possible association of WWS with MH or rhabdomyolysis cannot be excluded, and caution is needed when triggering drugs are used. Increases in ICP as well as decreases in cerebral perfusion pressure should be avoided in patients with hydrocephalus. Patients are at increased risk for postoperative respiratory complications and seizures, and should be monitored accordingly.

Conflicts of Interest

None.
  13 in total

1.  Serum creatine kinase levels after succinylcholine in children with "muscle, eye and brain disease".

Authors:  U Karhunen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Can inhalation agents be used in the presence of a child with myopathy?

Authors:  Francis Veyckemans
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.706

3.  Anesthesia for a child with Walker-Warburg syndrome.

Authors:  Emine Arzu Kose; Bulent Bakar; Gokay Ates; Didem Aliefendioglu; Alpaslan Apan
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-10-11

Review 4.  Walker-Warburg syndrome. Report of two cases.

Authors:  M M Vasconcelos; C R Guedes; R C Domingues; R N Vianna; M Sotero; M M Vieira
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.420

Review 5.  Congenital muscular dystrophies: 1997 update.

Authors:  T Voit
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 6.  Congenital muscular dystrophy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Q H Leyten; F J Gabreëls; W O Renier; H J ter Laak
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 7.  Congenital muscular dystrophy. Part I: a review of phenotypical and diagnostic aspects.

Authors:  Umbertina Conti Reed
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.420

8.  Genetic epidemiology of congenital muscular dystrophy in a sample from north-east Italy.

Authors:  M L Mostacciuolo; M Miorin; F Martinello; C Angelini; P Perini; C P Trevisan
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  Walker-Warburg syndrome.

Authors:  Jiri Vajsar; Harry Schachter
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 10.  Management of malignant hyperthermia: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Daniel Schneiderbanger; Stephan Johannsen; Norbert Roewer; Frank Schuster
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perioperative total intravenous anesthesia in a child with Walker-Warburg syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Wadeeah Bahaziq; Ahmed R Hassan; Majd Y Jubili; Abdulaziz Boker
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2022-03-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.