| Literature DB >> 26401092 |
Hasan Tahsin Gozdas1, Erkan Arpaci1.
Abstract
We read with interest the case report by Liu et al and the correspondence by Tuna et al regarding this case. Liu et al described hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after withdrawal of lamivudine prophylaxis. When HBV reactivation was observed three months after lamivudine withdrawal, entecavir 0.5 mg daily was started. HBV DNA level was moderately elevated (10(4) copies/mL) at that time. So, we could not understand why a potent antiviral like entecavir was required for this case. In addition to this, entecavir must be used at a dose of 1 mg in patients with prior prophylactic treatment with lamivudine. As stated by Tuna et al duration of lamivudine prophylaxis in this case might be insufficient and HBV reactivation might have occured for this reason. So, we suppose that resolution of HBV reactivation might also be achieved with lamivudine instead of entecavir in this case.Entities:
Keywords: Antiviral prophylaxis; Entecavir; Hepatitis B reactivation; Immunochemotherapy; Lamivudine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26401092 PMCID: PMC4572808 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742