Literature DB >> 26400743

Sex, long life and the evolutionary transition to cooperative breeding in birds.

Philip A Downing1, Charlie K Cornwallis2, Ashleigh S Griffin3.   

Abstract

Long life is a typical feature of individuals living in cooperative societies. One explanation is that group living lowers mortality, which selects for longer life. Alternatively, long life may make the evolution of cooperation more likely by ensuring a long breeding tenure, making helping behaviour and queuing for breeding positions worthwhile. The benefit of queuing will, however, depend on whether individuals gain indirect fitness benefits while helping, which is determined by female promiscuity. Where promiscuity is high and therefore the indirect fitness benefits of helping are low, cooperation can still be favoured by an even longer life span. We present the results of comparative analyses designed to test the likelihood of a causal relationship between longevity and cooperative breeding by reconstructing ancestral states of cooperative breeding across birds, and by examining the effect of female promiscuity on the relationship between these two traits. We found that long life makes the evolution of cooperation more likely and that promiscuous cooperative species are exceptionally long lived. These results make sense of promiscuity in cooperative breeders and clarify the importance of life-history traits in the evolution of cooperative breeding, illustrating that cooperation can evolve via the combination of indirect and direct fitness benefits.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  birds; inclusive fitness; life-history evolution; promiscuity; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26400743      PMCID: PMC4614776          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  30 in total

1.  Extra-pair paternity and egg dumping in birds: life history, parental care and the risk of retaliation.

Authors:  Kathryn E Arnold; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Nest inheritance is the missing source of direct fitness in a primitively eusocial insect.

Authors:  Ellouise Leadbeater; Jonathan M Carruthers; Jonathan P Green; Neil S Rosser; Jeremy Field
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies.

Authors:  Dieter Lukas; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Senescence in relation to latitude and migration in birds.

Authors:  A P Møller
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality.

Authors:  William O H Hughes; Benjamin P Oldroyd; Madeleine Beekman; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality.

Authors:  Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Eusociality but not fossoriality drives longevity in small mammals.

Authors:  Kevin Healy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  On size and survival: progress and pitfalls in the allometry of life span.

Authors:  D E Promislow
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1993-07

9.  Unrelated helpers in a social insect.

Authors:  D C Queller; F Zacchi; R Cervo; S Turillazzi; M T Henshaw; L A Santorelli; J E Strassmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models.

Authors:  Holger Schielzeth; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.671

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Cheating and punishment in cooperative animal societies.

Authors:  Christina Riehl; Megan E Frederickson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sex differences in helping effort reveal the effect of future reproduction on cooperative behaviour in birds.

Authors:  Philip A Downing; Ashleigh S Griffin; Charlie K Cornwallis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cooperative breeding and the evolutionary coexistence of helper and nonhelper strategies.

Authors:  Charlie K Cornwallis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Ten recent insights for our understanding of cooperation.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Guy A Cooper; Melanie B Ghoul; Ashleigh S Griffin
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Is degree of sociality associated with reproductive senescence? A comparative analysis across birds and mammals.

Authors:  Csongor I Vágási; Orsolya Vincze; Jean-François Lemaître; Péter L Pap; Victor Ronget; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Population level consequences of facultatively cooperative behaviour in a stochastic environment.

Authors:  Michela Busana; Dylan Z Childs; Terrence A Burke; Jan Komdeur; David S Richardson; Hannah L Dugdale
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Family living sets the stage for cooperative breeding and ecological resilience in birds.

Authors:  Michael Griesser; Szymon M Drobniak; Shinichi Nakagawa; Carlos A Botero
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Climate and the distribution of cooperative breeding in mammals.

Authors:  Dieter Lukas; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 9.  Occasional cooperative breeding in birds and the robustness of comparative analyses concerning the evolution of cooperative breeding.

Authors:  Michael Griesser; Toshitaka N Suzuki
Journal:  Zoological Lett       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.836

10.  Senescence: why and where selection gradients might not decline with age.

Authors:  Mark Roper; Pol Capdevila; Roberto Salguero-Gómez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.