Literature DB >> 26400238

Impact of Building Height and Volume on Cardiac Arrest Response Time.

Anders B Conway, Andrew McDavid, Jamie M Emert, Peter J Kudenchuk, Benjamin A Stubbs, Thomas D Rea, Lihua Yin, Michele Olsufka, Andrew M McCoy, Michael R Sayre.   

Abstract

Emergency medical services (EMS) care may be delayed when out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs in tall or large buildings. We hypothesized that larger building height and volume were related to a longer curb-to-defibrillator activation interval. We retrospectively evaluated 3,065 EMS responses to OHCA in a large city between 2003-13 that occurred indoors, prior to EMS arrival, and without prior deployment of a defibrillator. The two-tiered EMS system uses automated external defibrillator-equipped basic life support firefighters followed by paramedics dispatched from a single call center. We calculated three time intervals obtained from the computerized dispatch report and time-synchronized defibrillators: initial 911 call to address curb arrival by first unit (call-to-curb), curb arrival to defibrillator power on (curb-to-defib on), and the combined call-to-defib on interval. Building height and surface area were measured with a validated program based on aerial photography. Buildings were categorized by height as short (<25 ft), medium (26-64 ft) and tall (>64 ft). Volume was categorized as small (<60,000 ft(3)), midsize (60,000-1,202,600 ft(3)) and large (>1,202,600 ft(3)). Intervals were compared using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. EMS responded to 1,673 OHCA events in short, 1,134 in medium, and 258 in tall buildings. There was a 1.14 minute increase in median curb-to-defib on interval from 1.97 in short to 3.11 minutes in tall buildings (p < 0.01). Taller buildings, however, had a shorter call-to-curb interval (4.73 for short vs 3.96 minutes for tall, p < 0.01), such that the difference in call-to-defib on interval was only 0.27 minutes: 6.87 for short and 7.14 for tall buildings. A similar relationship was observed for small-volume compared to large-volume building: longer curb-to-AED (1.90 vs. 3.01 minutes, p < 0.01), but shorter call-to-curb (4.87 vs. 4.05, p < 0.01); the difference in call-to-defib on was 0.18 minutes. Both taller and larger-volume buildings had longer curb-to-AED intervals but shorter 911 call-to-curb arrival intervals. As a consequence, building height and volume had a modest overall relationship with interval from call to defibrillator application. These results do not support the hypothesis that either taller or larger-volume buildings need cause poorer outcomes in urban environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiopulmonary resuscitation; emergency medical services; geographic mapping; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; quality control; time-to-treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26400238     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1061624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  3 in total

1.  Association of Neighborhood Demographics With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Treatment and Outcomes: Where You Live May Matter.

Authors:  Monique Anderson Starks; Robert H Schmicker; Eric D Peterson; Susanne May; Jason E Buick; Peter J Kudenchuk; Ian R Drennan; Heather Herren; Jamie Jasti; Michael Sayre; Dion Stub; Gary M Vilke; Shannon W Stephens; Anna M Chang; Jack Nuttall; Graham Nichol
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Worsened survival in the head-up tilt position cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine cardiac arrest model.

Authors:  Yong Joo Park; Ki Jeong Hong; Sang Do Shin; Tae Yun Kim; Young Sun Ro; Kyoung Jun Song; Hyun Ho Ryu
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2019-09-30

3.  Effect of the Floor Level on the Probability of a Neurologically Favorable Discharge after Cardiac Arrest according to the Event Location.

Authors:  Han Joo Choi; Hyung Jun Moon; Won Jung Jeong; Gi Woon Kim; Jae Hyug Woo; Kyoung Mi Lee; Hyuk Joong Choi; Yong Jin Park; Choung Ah Lee
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.112

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.