Literature DB >> 26400023

Decitabine versus best supportive care in older patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEBt) - results of a subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III study 06011 of the EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group and German MDS Study Group (GMDSSG).

Heiko Becker1, Stefan Suciu2, Björn Hans Rüter1, Uwe Platzbecker3, Aristoteles Giagounidis4, Dominik Selleslag5, Boris Labar6, Ulrich Germing7, Helmut R Salih8, Petra Muus9, Karl-Heinz Pflüger10, Anne Hagemeijer11, Hans-Eckart Schaefer12, Valeria Fiaccadori2, Frédéric Baron13, Arnold Ganser14, Carlo Aul15, Theo de Witte9, Pierre W Wijermans16, Michael Lübbert17.   

Abstract

In the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/GMDSSG phase III trial 06011, we compared decitabine (15 mg/m(2) every 8 h for 3 days) with best supportive care (BSC) in patients ≥60 years with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) by French-American-British (FAB) criteria. Here, we reinvestigate trial 06011 for the activity and efficacy specifically in patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEBt). Response rates in the decitabine arm (N = 40) were as follows: complete or partial remission, 15 %; hematologic improvement, 15 %; resistant disease, 30 %. RAEBt patients in the decitabine arm had longer progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio (HR) 0.30, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.51; median, 6.2 vs 2.8 months) and overall survival (OS; HR 0.68, 95 % CI 0.42-1.11; median, 8.0 vs 6.0 months) than in the BSC arm (N = 35). Censoring at allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the OS difference between the treatment groups increased, particularly among patients aged 60-74 years (HR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.26-0.89). After regrouping the study cohort according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (i.e., ≥20 % blasts) in the decitabine arm (N = 27) also had longer PFS than in the BSC arm (N = 23) (HR 0.46, 95 % CI 0.26-0.83; median, 6.2 vs 2.8 months). In conclusion, 3-day decitabine displays clinical activity and efficacy in MDS and/or AML with 5-30 % blood or 20-30 % marrow blasts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AML; Allogeneic transplantation; Epigenetic therapy; Leukemia; MDS; RAEBt

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26400023     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-015-2489-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  7 in total

Review 1.  Hypomethylating Agents as a Therapy for AML.

Authors:  Claude Gardin; Hervé Dombret
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  How and when to decide between epigenetic therapy and chemotherapy in patients with AML.

Authors:  Hervé Dombret; Raphael Itzykson
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

3.  American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for treating newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in older adults.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; Gordon Guyatt; Gregory Abel; Shabbir Alibhai; Jessica K Altman; Rena Buckstein; Hannah Choe; Pinkal Desai; Harry Erba; Christopher S Hourigan; Thomas W LeBlanc; Mark Litzow; Janet MacEachern; Laura C Michaelis; Sudipto Mukherjee; Kristen O'Dwyer; Ashley Rosko; Richard Stone; Arnav Agarwal; L E Colunga-Lozano; Yaping Chang; QiuKui Hao; Romina Brignardello-Petersen
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-08-11

4.  Azacitidine front-line in 339 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia: comparison of French-American-British and World Health Organization classifications.

Authors:  Lisa Pleyer; Sonja Burgstaller; Reinhard Stauder; Michael Girschikofsky; Heinz Sill; Konstantin Schlick; Josef Thaler; Britta Halter; Sigrid Machherndl-Spandl; Armin Zebisch; Angelika Pichler; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Eva-Maria Autzinger; Alois Lang; Klaus Geissler; Daniela Voskova; Dietmar Geissler; Wolfgang R Sperr; Sabine Hojas; Inga M Rogulj; Johannes Andel; Richard Greil
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 5.  Targeting epigenetic pathways in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a systematic review of hypomethylating agents trials.

Authors:  Seongseok Yun; Nicole D Vincelette; Ivo Abraham; Keith D Robertson; Martin E Fernandez-Zapico; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 6.551

6.  Monosomal karyotype and chromosome 17p loss or TP53 mutations in decitabine-treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Heiko Becker; Dietmar Pfeifer; Gabriele Ihorst; Milena Pantic; Julius Wehrle; Björn H Rüter; Lars Bullinger; Björn Hackanson; Ulrich Germing; Andrea Kuendgen; Uwe Platzbecker; Konstanze Döhner; Arnold Ganser; Anne Hagemeijer; Pierre W Wijermans; Hartmut Döhner; Justus Duyster; Michael Lübbert
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 3.673

7.  No benefit of hypomethylating agents compared to supportive care for higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Sang Kyun Sohn; Joon Ho Moon; In Hee Lee; Jae Sook Ahn; Hyeoung Joon Kim; Joo Seop Chung; Ho Jin Shin; Sung Woo Park; Won Sik Lee; Sang Min Lee; Hawk Kim; Ho Sup Lee; Yang Soo Kim; Yoon Young Cho; Sung Hwa Bae; Ji Hyun Lee; Sung Hyun Kim; Ik Chan Song; Ji Hyun Kwon; Yoo Jin Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.884

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.