Literature DB >> 26399718

Geographic Variation of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Canada: An Alberta-Based Small Area Variation Analysis.

Luke Rudmik1, Ceris Bird2, Stafford Dean2, Joseph C Dort3, Richard Schorn2, Edward Kukec2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With an estimated 10,000 to 15,000 endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) cases performed in Canada each year, identifying potential unwarranted practice patterns is important. The objective of this study is to examine the rates and geographic variation of ESS in the province of Alberta, Canada. STUDY
DESIGN: Small area variation analysis.
SETTING: Province of Alberta, Canada. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The National Ambulatory Care Reporting System database was searched to identify all patients who received ESS between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2013, in Alberta, Canada. The annual adjusted rates of ESS per 1000 people were calculated for each Alberta health zone and health status area. Geographic variations were evaluated with the extremal quotient, weighted coefficient of variation, and systematic component of variance. Chi-squared-test was used to quantify the significance of variation of the adjusted ESS rates across regions.
RESULTS: The annual adjusted rate of ESS was 0.33 per 1000 people in Alberta, Canada. The mean extremal quotient for health status areas was 6.9, indicating a 7-fold difference between the highest and lowest regions. The mean coefficient of variation was 41.0, and the mean systematic component of variance was 10.5, which demonstrates "very high" variation.
CONCLUSION: This study observed very high geographic variation in the rates of ESS across the province of Alberta. Given the negative impact of unwarranted surgical variation on quality of care, outcomes from this study indicate a need to further evaluate the delivery of care for ESS in Canada to improve overall health system performance. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; appropriateness; chronic rhinosinusitis; endoscopic sinus surgery; quality of care; sinusitis; variation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26399718     DOI: 10.1177/0194599815602679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sino-Nasal outcome test-22 outcomes after sinus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zachary M Soler; Rabun Jones; Phong Le; Luke Rudmik; Jose L Mattos; Shaun A Nguyen; Rodney J Schlosser
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Evaluating Surgeon-Specific Performance for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Yuan Xu; Jeremiah A Alt; Adam Deconde; Timothy L Smith; Rodney J Schlosser; Hude Quan; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Geographic and temporal variation in the treatment and outcomes of atrial fibrillation: a population-based analysis of national quality indicators.

Authors:  Derek S Chew; Flora Au; Yuan Xu; Braden J Manns; Marcello Tonelli; Stephen B Wilton; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Shiying Kong; Derek V Exner; Amity E Quinn
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2022-08-02

4.  What is the optimal outcome after endoscopic sinus surgery in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis? A consultation of Canadian experts.

Authors:  Nadim Saydy; Sami P Moubayed; Marie Bussières; Arif Janjua; Shaun Kilty; François Lavigne; Eric Monteiro; Smriti Nayan; Marilou Piché; Kristine Smith; Doron Sommer; Leigh Sowerby; Marc A Tewfik; Ian J Witterick; Erin Wright; Martin Desrosiers
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-06-16

5.  Healthcare utilisation, follow-up of guidelines and practice variation on rhinosinusitis in adults: A healthcare reimbursement claims study in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Nina M Kaper; Mark C J Aarts; Robert J Stokroos; Geert J M G van der Heijden
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.729

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.