Literature DB >> 26399633

Drug delivery system innovation and Health Technology Assessment: Upgrading from Clinical to Technological Assessment.

Michele Panzitta1, Giorgio Bruno2, Stefano Giovagnoli3, Francesca R Mendicino4, Maurizio Ricci5.   

Abstract

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary health political instrument that evaluates the consequences, mainly clinical and economical, of a health care technology; the HTA aim is to produce and spread information on scientific and technological innovation for health political decision making process. Drug delivery systems (DDS), such as nanocarriers, are technologically complex but they have pivotal relevance in therapeutic innovation. The HTA process, as commonly applied to conventional drug evaluation, should upgrade to a full pharmaceutical assessment, considering the DDS complexity. This is useful to study more in depth the clinical outcome and to broaden its critical assessment toward pharmaceutical issues affecting the patient and not measured by the current clinical evidence approach. We draw out the expertise necessary to perform the pharmaceutical assessment and we propose a format to evaluate the DDS technological topics such as formulation and mechanism of action, physicochemical characteristics, manufacturing process. We integrated the above-mentioned three points in the Evidence Based Medicine approach, which is data source for any HTA process. In this regard, the introduction of a Pharmaceutics Expert figure in the HTA could be fundamental to grant a more detailed evaluation of medicine product characteristics and performances and to help optimizing DDS features to overcome R&D drawbacks. Some aspects of product development, such as manufacturing processes, should be part of the HTA as innovative manufacturing processes allow new products to reach more effectively patient bedside. HTA so upgraded may encourage resource allocating payers to invest in innovative technologies and providers to focus on innovative material properties and manufacturing processes, thus contributing to bring more medicines in therapy in a sustainable manner.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical pharmaceutics; Drug delivery systems; Health Technology Assessment; Nanoparticles; Pharmaceutics; Quality by design; Quality risk management

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26399633     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  4 in total

1.  Health Economic Data in Reimbursement of New Medical Technologies: Importance of the Socio-Economic Burden as a Decision-Making Criterion.

Authors:  Georgi Iskrov; Svetlan Dermendzhiev; Tsonka Miteva-Katrandzhieva; Rumen Stefanov
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs.

Authors:  Georgi Iskrov; Tsonka Miteva-Katrandzhieva; Rumen Stefanov
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-09-30

3.  Encapsulation of the HSP-90 Chaperone Inhibitor 17-AAG in Stable Liposome Allow Increasing the Therapeutic Index as Assessed, in vitro, on Leishmania (L) amazonensis Amastigotes-Hosted in Mouse CBA Macrophages.

Authors:  Antonio Luis de Oliveira Almeida Petersen; Thiers A Campos; Diana Angélica Dos Santos Dantas; Juliana de Souza Rebouças; Juliana Cruz da Silva; Juliana P B de Menezes; Fábio R Formiga; Janaina V de Melo; Giovanna Machado; Patrícia S T Veras
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 4.  Improving Interactions Between Health Technology Assessment Bodies and Regulatory Agencies: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Survey on Processes, Progress, Outcomes, and Challenges.

Authors:  Richard Ofori-Asenso; Christine E Hallgreen; Marie Louise De Bruin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-10-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.