| Literature DB >> 26399368 |
Martin Keller1, Frédéric Ebstein1, Elke Bürger1, Kathrin Textoris-Taube1, Xenia Gorny2, Sabrina Urban1, Fang Zhao3, Tanja Dannenberg3, Antje Sucker3, Christin Keller1, Loredana Saveanu4, Elke Krüger1, Hermann-Josef Rothkötter5, Burkhardt Dahlmann1, Petra Henklein1, Antje Voigt1,6, Ulrike Kuckelkorn1, Annette Paschen3, Peter-Michael Kloetzel1, Ulrike Seifert1,2.
Abstract
The immunodominant MART-1(26(27)-35) epitope, liberated from the differentiation antigen melanoma antigen recognized by T cells/melanoma antigen A (MART-1/Melan-A), has been frequently targeted in melanoma immunotherapy, but with limited clinical success. Previous studies suggested that this is in part due to an insufficient peptide supply and epitope presentation, since proteasomes containing the immunosubunits β5i/LMP7 (LMP, low molecular weight protein) or β1i/LMP2 and β5i/LMP7 interfere with MART-1(26-35) epitope generation in tumor cells. Here, we demonstrate that in addition the IFN-γ-inducible proteasome subunit β2i/MECL-1 (multicatalytic endopeptidase complex-like 1), proteasome activator 28 (PA28), and ER-resident aminopeptidase 1 (ERAP1) impair MART-1(26-35) epitope generation. β2i/MECL-1 and PA28 negatively affect C- and N-terminal cleavage and therefore epitope liberation from the proteasome, whereas ERAP1 destroys the MART-1(26-35) epitope by overtrimming activity. Constitutive expression of PA28 and ERAP1 in melanoma cells indicate that both interfere with MART-1(26-35) epitope generation even in the absence of IFN-γ. In summary, our results provide first evidence that activities of different antigen-processing components contribute to an inefficient MART-1(26-35) epitope presentation, suggesting the tumor cell's proteolytic machinery might have an important impact on the outcome of epitope-specific immunotherapies.Entities:
Keywords: Antigen processing; Cellular cytotoxicity; ER-aminopeptidase; Melanoma; Melanoma antigen recognized by T cells/melanoma antigen A; PA28; Proteasome subunit
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26399368 DOI: 10.1002/eji.201445243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Immunol ISSN: 0014-2980 Impact factor: 5.532