Literature DB >> 26399162

Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery.

Eran Ashwal1,2, Avital Wertheimer1,2, Amir Aviram1,2, Arnon Wiznitzer1,2, Yariv Yogev1,2, Liran Hiersch1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton pregnancies and a prior single low transverse cesarean section (CS) who attempted vaginal delivery in a tertiary hospital (2010-2014). Pregnancy outcome of women with VBAC was compared to those who failed vaginal delivery. Sub-analysis for women with no prior vaginal deliveries was performed. Pregnancies with non-cephalic presentation, estimated fetal weight >4000 g and any contraindications for vaginal delivery were excluded.
RESULTS: Of the 40 714 deliveries, 1767 women met inclusion criteria. Among them 1563 (88.5%) had a VBAC and 204 (11.5%) failed. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding maternal age, comorbidities and pregnancy complications. Predictors for VBAC were (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) interval from prior CS (1.13, 1.04-1.22, p=0.004), previous VBAC (2.77, 1.60-4.78, p < 0.001), prior vaginal delivery prior to the CS (3.05, 1.73-5.39, p < 0.001) and induction of labor (0.62, 0.40-0.97, p = 0.03). For women with no prior vaginal birth, only birthweight was associated with VBAC (0.99, 0.99-1.00, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: While different variables may influence the rate of VBAC, the predictive ability of VBAC for women with no previous vaginal deliveries remains poor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; pregnancy; vaginal birth after cesarean section

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26399162     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1099156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  5 in total

1.  Factors obstetricians, family physicians and midwives consider when counselling women about a trial of labour after caesarean and planned repeat caesarean: a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Christine Kurtz Landy; Wendy Sword; Jackie Cramp Kathnelson; Sarah McDonald; Anne Biringer; Maureen Heaman; Pam Angle
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Oxytocin use in trial of labor after cesarean and its relationship with risk of uterine rupture in women with one previous cesarean section: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Shouling Luo; Weirong Gu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Factors Associated with Successful Trial of Labor after Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Aram Thapsamuthdechakorn; Ratanaporn Sekararithi; Theera Tongsong
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2018-06-03

4.  Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanxin Wu; Yachana Kataria; Zilian Wang; Wai-Kit Ming; Christina Ellervik
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Establishment of an antepartum predictive scoring model to identify candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean.

Authors:  Qiuping Liao; Jinying Luo; Lianghui Zheng; Qing Han; Zhaodong Liu; Wei Qi; Tingting Yang; Jianying Yan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.