| Literature DB >> 26397732 |
Samrah Ahmed1, Laura Brennan2, Joel Eppig2, Catherine C Price3, Melissa Lamar4, Lisa Delano-Wood5, Katherine J Bangen6, Emily C Edmonds6, Lindsey Clark7, Daniel A Nation8, Amy Jak5, Rhoda Au9,10, Rodney Swenson11, Mark W Bondi5, David J Libon2.
Abstract
Clock Drawing Test performance was examined alongside other neuropsychological tests in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We tested the hypothesis that clock-drawing errors are related to executive impairment. The current research examined 86 patients with MCI for whom, in prior research, cluster analysis was used to sort patients into dysexecutive (dMCI, n = 22), amnestic (aMCI, n = 13), and multidomain (mMCI, n = 51) subtypes. First, principal components analysis (PCA) and linear regression examined relations between clock-drawing errors and neuropsychological test performance independent of MCI subtype. Second, between-group differences were assessed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) where MCI subgroups were compared to normal controls (NC). PCA yielded a 3-group solution. Contrary to expectations, clock-drawing errors loaded with lower performance on naming/lexical retrieval, rather than with executive tests. Regression analyses found increasing clock-drawing errors to command were associated with worse performance only on naming/lexical retrieval tests. ANOVAs revealed no differences in clock-drawing errors between dMCI versus mMCI or aMCI versus NCs. Both the dMCI and mMCI groups generated more clock-drawing errors than the aMCI and NC groups in the command condition. In MCI, language-related skills contribute to clock-drawing impairment.Entities:
Keywords: Boston process approach; clock drawing; cluster analysis; executive control; mild cognitive impairment; visuoconstruction
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26397732 PMCID: PMC5927360 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2014.1003067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Neuropsychol Adult ISSN: 2327-9095 Impact factor: 2.248