Literature DB >> 26397036

Suppressing the truth as a mechanism of deception: Delta plots reveal the role of response inhibition in lying.

Evelyne Debey1, Richard K Ridderinkhof2, Jan De Houwer1, Maarten De Schryver1, Bruno Verschuere3.   

Abstract

Lying takes more time than telling the truth. Because lying involves withholding the truth, this "lie effect" has been related to response inhibition. We investigated the response inhibition hypothesis of lying using the delta-plot method: A leveling-off of the standard increase of the lie effect with slower reaction times would be indicative of successful response inhibition. Participants performed a reaction-time task that required them to alternate between lying and truth telling in response to autobiographical questions. In two experiments, we found that the delta plot of the lie effect leveled off with longer response latencies, but only in a group of participants who had better inhibitory skills as indexed by relatively small lie effects. This finding supports the role of response inhibition in lying. We elaborate on repercussions for cognitive models of deception and the data analysis of reaction-time based lie tests.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deception; Delta plots; Reaction time; Response inhibition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26397036     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  7 in total

1.  Delta plots with negative-going slopes as a potential marker of decreasing response activation in masked semantic priming.

Authors:  Ruben Ellinghaus; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-03-01

2.  Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context.

Authors:  Evelyne Debey; Baptist Liefooghe; Jan De Houwer; Bruno Verschuere
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-13

3.  Deceptive but Not Honest Manipulative Actions Are Associated with Increased Interaction between Middle and Inferior Frontal gyri.

Authors:  Maxim Kireev; Alexander Korotkov; Natalia Medvedeva; Ruslan Masharipov; Svyatoslav Medvedev
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Lie Detection Using fNIRS Monitoring of Inhibition-Related Brain Regions Discriminates Infrequent but not Frequent Liars.

Authors:  Fang Li; Huilin Zhu; Jie Xu; Qianqian Gao; Huan Guo; Shijing Wu; Xinge Li; Sailing He
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Neural mechanisms of deception in a social context: an fMRI replication study.

Authors:  Maya Zheltyakova; Maxim Kireev; Alexander Korotkov; Svyatoslav Medvedev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.

Authors:  Tom Parkhouse; Thomas C Ormerod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Memory-Based Deception Detection: Extending the Cognitive Signature of Lying From Instructed to Self-Initiated Cheating.

Authors:  Linda M Geven; Gershon Ben-Shakhar; Merel Kindt; Bruno Verschuere
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-06-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.