Literature DB >> 26396855

Crystal structure of 2,4-di-nitro-phenyl 4-methyl-benzene-sulfonate: a new polymorph.

Tyler A Cooley1, Sean Riley1, Shannon M Biros1, Richard J Staples2, Felix N Ngassa1.   

Abstract

The title compound, C13H10N2O7S, was synthesized via a nucleophilic substitution reaction between 2,4-di-nitro-phenol and p-toluene-sulfonyl chloride. This crystal structure is a polymorph of CSD entry WUVYUH [Vembu et al. (2003). Acta Cryst, E59, o378-380]. The aromatic substituents on the sulfonate group are oriented gauche to one another with a C-O-S-C torsion angle of -62.0 (3)°. The supra-molecular features that contribute to the crystal stability are offset π-π [centroid-centroid distance = 3.729 (2) Å] and multiple C-H⋯O inter-actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C—H⋯O inter­actions; aryl sulfonate; crystal structure; p-toluene­sulfonyl chloride; π–π inter­actions

Year:  2015        PMID: 26396855      PMCID: PMC4555369          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015015650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Nucleophilic substitution reactions at the carbonyl carbon atom are an important class of reactions in biological processes. Analogous to the carbonyl group, nucleophilic substitution reactions of sulfonyl derivatives have also been reported (Castro et al., 2003 ▸; Terrier et al., 2003 ▸; Um et al., 2004 ▸, 2013 ▸; Qrareya et al., 2014 ▸). The mechanism of nucleophilic substitution reactions at the carbonyl group is well understood (Stefanidis et al., 1993 ▸; Lee et al., 2002 ▸). However, the mechanism for nucleophilic substitution reactions at the sulfonyl group is not fully understood (Morales-Rojas & Moss, 2002 ▸; Um et al., 2013 ▸). A review of the current literature lends credence to both a concerted mechanism and a non-concerted mechanism (Guthrie, 1991 ▸; Colthurst & Williams, 1997 ▸; Spillane et al., 2001 ▸; Um et al., 2003 ▸, 2004 ▸, 2013 ▸). Using primary and secondary amines as nucleophiles, the factors influencing regioselectivity of nucleophilic substitution reactions at the sulfonyl group have been reported (Um et al., 2004 ▸). It has been demonstrated that the regioselectivity and S—O bond-fission mechanism depends on the basicity of the amine and the electronic nature of the sulfonyl substituent. Based on the current state of knowledge in the field, we have sought to capitalize on the chemistry learned on the mechanistic insight of S—O vs C—O bond fission by investigating the effect of different substituents on the reactivity of sulfonates. In our work, we are inter­ested in using various sulfonate analogues (Fig. 1 ▸) as electrophilic substrates in nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAr) reactions similar to those reported by others (Qrareya et al., 2014 ▸). As the title compound is of inter­est in our ongoing effort on probing the mechanism of SNAr reactions with sulfonate derivatives, we report here on the synthesis and crystal structure of a new polymorph of 2,4-di­nitro­phenyl 4-methyl­benzene­sulfonate (Fig. 2 ▸).
Figure 1

General structure of sulfonate analogues. R represents electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents.

Figure 2

(a) The asymmetric unit of the title compound along with the atom-numbering scheme, showing displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level; (b) the structure and atom-numbering scheme of a polymorph of the title compound WUVYUH (Vembu, et al., 2003a ▸). All hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.

Structural commentary

The central sulfur atom (S1) is tetra­hedral with S=O bond lengths of 1.415 (3) and 1.414 (3) Å, and an S—O bond length of 1.634 (3) Å (Fig. 2 ▸ a). The bond angle between the S=O groups (O1—S1—O2) is 121.20 (17)°, while that of the aromatic substituents (O3—S1—C5) is 103.27 (15)°. The two aromatic rings are in a gauche orientation about the O3—S1 bond with a torsion angle (C8—O3—S1—C5) of −62.0 (3)°. For comparison, the polymorph WUVYUH (Vembu et al., 2003a ▸) has S=O bond lengths of 1.4204 (10) and 1.4246 (10) Å, and the S—O bond length is 1.6195 (9) Å (Fig. 2 ▸ b). While the bond lengths of the two polymorphs agree within 0.01 Å of each other, there are some differences between bond angles. The aromatic rings in WUVYUH are in an anti orientation along the S—O bond, with a torsion angle of 141.02 (9)°. The bond angle between the S=O groups (O1—S1—O2) is 119.80 (6)°, while that of the aromatic substituents (O3—S1—C5) is 98.17 (5)°.

Supra­molecular features

There are no classical hydrogen-bonding inter­actions in this crystal. There are, however, several inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions with D⋯A distances less than 3.5 Å and D—H⋯A angles greater than 120° (Table 1 ▸, Fig. 3 ▸). An offset π–π stacking inter­action is present between the relatively electron-poor ring C8–C13 and the relatively electron-rich ring C2–C7v (Fig. 4 ▸). The centroid–centroid distance is 3.729 (2) Å, the C2–C7 ring is offset by 1.529 (5) Å and tilted 5.74 (12)° out of the plane defined by the C8–C13 ring [symmetry code: (v)  − x, − + y, − + z].
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
C3H3O2i 0.952.423.273(5)149
C4H4O6ii 0.952.573.486(5)162
C7H7O7iii 0.952.753.499(5)137
C10H10O7iv 0.952.513.233(5)133
C12H12O4v 0.952.343.087(5)135

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

Figure 3

A drawing of a selection of the C—H⋯O inter­actions present in the crystal lattice using a ball and stick model. Symmetry codes: (i) −x + 1, −y + 1, z + ; (ii) −x + , y + , z − ; (iii) −x + 2, −y + 2, z − .

Figure 4

A drawing of the inter­molecular π–π stacking and nitro–sulfonic ester inter­actions present in the crystal using a ball and stick model. Symmetry code (v) −x + , y − , z + .

One nitro group (N2,O6,O7) is in proximity to the sulfonic ester of the C2–C7v ring of a nearby π–π dimer. Fig. 4 ▸ also shows that the atoms of these two functional groups are oriented to align the electron-poor N2(nitro) with the electron-rich O1(sulfonic ester), and the electron-poor S1(sulfonic ester) with the electron-rich O7(nitro). Inter­atomic distances are N2(nitro)⋯O17v(sulfonic ester) = 3.379 (4) Å, and O7(nitro)⋯S1v(sulfonic ester) = 3.877 (3) Å. The relatively short inter­molecular distance between N2 and O17 suggests the presence of favorable N⋯O inter­actions in the crystal (Daszkiewicz, 2013 ▸).

Database survey

The Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, version 5.36, May 2015: Groom and Allen, 2014 ▸) contains 171 aromatic 4-toluene­sulfonic esters. Of these, there are 14 structures where the aromatic ring bears substituents at both the 2- and 4-positions. One of these structures is quite similar to the title compound (GOFTIF: Ji et al., 2008 ▸) where the ortho-substit­uent is a nitro group and the para-position bears a second tosyl­ate group. The remaining entries have various electron-rich groups in the ortho-position including meth­oxy (e.g. FEMROF: Ichikawa et al., 2004 ▸), eth­oxy (e.g. HIRHOG: Ramachandran et al., 2007 ▸), chlorine (OJENEW: Vembu et al., 2003b ▸) and alkyl amine (PERFEZ: Zhao et al., 2013 ▸). The CSD contains three additional structures where the position ortho to the sulfonic ester bears a nitro group. In FAYBAJ (Manivannan et al., 2005 ▸), this o-nitro group is the only substituent. The aromatic ring in XIYZIP is part of a naphthalene system and also bears a 4-nitro group (Ramachandran et al., 2008 ▸). The third structure in this set is a polymorph of the title compound (WUVYUH: Vembu et al., 2003a ▸) that was solved in the ortho­rhom­bic space group Pbca. One significant difference between WUVYUH and the title compound is the orientation of the groups around the S—O bond (see the Structural commentary section for more details).

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was prepared by stirring 2,4-di­nitro­phenol (5 mmol), p-toluene­sulfonyl chloride (5 mmol) and pyridine (3 mmol) in 10 mL of di­chloro­methane for 30 minutes at room temperature. The reaction was heated to 353 K for 30 minutes in a microwave reactor, then cooled to room temperature and stirred overnight in a fume hood. The reaction mixture was transferred to a scintillation vial where the pale yellow product crystallized upon standing after several days and was filtered from the mother liquor (m.p. 393.4–394.7 K).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. Hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) for CH groups and U iso(H) = 1.5 U eq(C) for methyl groups.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC13H10N2O7S
M r 338.29
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P n a21
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c ()14.7716(12), 12.6403(11), 7.6734(6)
V (3)1432.8(2)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo K
(mm1)0.27
Crystal size (mm)0.27 0.21 0.20
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
T min, T max 0.686, 0.745
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections11432, 2624, 2326
R int 0.036
(sin /)max (1)0.603
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.034, 0.088, 1.05
No. of reflections2624
No. of parameters209
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
max, min (e 3)0.18, 0.18
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 970 quotients [(I +)(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013).
Absolute structure parameter0.02(4)

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2013 ▸), XS (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), CrystalMaker (Palmer, 2007 ▸) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸; Bourhis et al., 2015 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015015650/pk2562sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015015650/pk2562Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015015650/pk2562Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1419864 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C13H10N2O7SDx = 1.568 Mg m3
Mr = 338.29Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pna21Cell parameters from 5781 reflections
a = 14.7716 (12) Åθ = 2.8–25.4°
b = 12.6403 (11) ŵ = 0.27 mm1
c = 7.6734 (6) ÅT = 173 K
V = 1432.8 (2) Å3Chunk, yellow
Z = 40.27 × 0.21 × 0.20 mm
F(000) = 696
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer2624 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube2326 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.036
Detector resolution: 8 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.4°, θmin = 2.1°
φ and ω scansh = −17→17
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)k = −15→15
Tmin = 0.686, Tmax = 0.745l = −9→9
11432 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0448P)2 + 0.2683P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.088(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.18 e Å3
2624 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
209 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 970 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013).
1 restraintAbsolute structure parameter: −0.02 (4)
Experimental. SADABS (Bruker, 2014) was used for absorption correction. wR2(int) was 0.0928 before and 0.0535 after correction. The Ratio of minimum to maximum transmission is 0.9202. The λ/2 correction factor is 0.00150.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.84591 (5)0.72917 (7)0.62435 (14)0.0377 (2)
O10.92559 (18)0.7834 (2)0.5749 (4)0.0520 (8)
O20.84576 (18)0.6573 (2)0.7657 (4)0.0480 (8)
O30.82059 (18)0.6622 (2)0.4489 (3)0.0393 (6)
O40.7331 (2)0.7555 (3)0.1741 (4)0.0698 (10)
O50.6041 (2)0.8003 (2)0.2866 (5)0.0622 (9)
O60.43774 (19)0.4573 (2)0.3474 (4)0.0569 (8)
O70.5026 (2)0.3344 (2)0.4987 (4)0.0552 (8)
N10.6675 (2)0.7407 (3)0.2684 (5)0.0447 (8)
N20.5033 (2)0.4212 (3)0.4265 (4)0.0409 (7)
C10.5319 (3)1.0307 (3)0.6779 (6)0.0526 (11)
H1A0.47690.99500.63760.079*
H1B0.54361.09270.60470.079*
H1C0.52401.05310.79910.079*
C20.6109 (2)0.9555 (3)0.6659 (5)0.0383 (9)
C30.6881 (3)0.9821 (3)0.5730 (5)0.0391 (9)
H30.69111.04900.51670.047*
C40.7608 (2)0.9138 (3)0.5602 (4)0.0360 (8)
H40.81300.93280.49500.043*
C50.7559 (2)0.8168 (2)0.6448 (4)0.0299 (7)
C60.6796 (2)0.7879 (3)0.7391 (4)0.0345 (8)
H60.67700.72140.79660.041*
C70.6077 (2)0.8575 (3)0.7480 (5)0.0373 (8)
H70.55510.83800.81140.045*
C80.7418 (2)0.6020 (3)0.4478 (5)0.0323 (8)
C90.6651 (2)0.6401 (3)0.3637 (4)0.0307 (7)
C100.5859 (2)0.5833 (3)0.3596 (5)0.0337 (8)
H100.53290.61100.30610.040*
C110.5861 (2)0.4846 (3)0.4361 (5)0.0323 (8)
C120.6613 (2)0.4440 (3)0.5188 (5)0.0363 (8)
H120.65930.37540.56930.044*
C130.7395 (2)0.5035 (3)0.5279 (5)0.0362 (8)
H130.79110.47740.58800.043*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0284 (4)0.0403 (4)0.0443 (5)0.0001 (4)−0.0037 (5)0.0048 (5)
O10.0275 (12)0.0566 (16)0.072 (2)−0.0066 (12)0.0026 (13)0.0053 (15)
O20.0478 (17)0.0453 (15)0.0507 (17)0.0058 (12)−0.0094 (13)0.0130 (13)
O30.0330 (13)0.0407 (14)0.0444 (15)0.0004 (12)0.0077 (11)−0.0014 (12)
O40.077 (2)0.069 (2)0.063 (2)−0.0155 (17)0.0088 (18)0.0306 (17)
O50.073 (2)0.0364 (14)0.077 (2)0.0159 (15)−0.0244 (17)0.0065 (15)
O60.0387 (16)0.0549 (17)0.077 (2)−0.0012 (14)−0.0106 (16)−0.0068 (17)
O70.070 (2)0.0441 (15)0.0517 (17)−0.0187 (14)0.0021 (15)0.0053 (14)
N10.058 (2)0.0326 (16)0.044 (2)−0.0040 (16)−0.0153 (17)0.0052 (14)
N20.044 (2)0.0391 (16)0.0391 (18)−0.0051 (15)0.0050 (16)−0.0065 (15)
C10.051 (2)0.047 (2)0.059 (3)0.0125 (18)−0.009 (2)−0.011 (2)
C20.0358 (19)0.0371 (18)0.042 (2)0.0007 (16)−0.0077 (16)−0.0076 (17)
C30.050 (2)0.0285 (17)0.039 (2)−0.0011 (16)−0.0090 (17)0.0033 (15)
C40.0358 (19)0.0388 (19)0.0335 (19)−0.0086 (16)0.0015 (15)0.0028 (15)
C50.0268 (16)0.0322 (15)0.0307 (18)−0.0046 (13)−0.0045 (15)0.0029 (17)
C60.037 (2)0.0323 (18)0.0342 (19)−0.0063 (15)−0.0001 (16)0.0020 (16)
C70.0304 (18)0.042 (2)0.039 (2)−0.0069 (16)0.0000 (16)−0.0065 (17)
C80.0294 (18)0.0328 (18)0.0346 (17)0.0035 (14)0.0080 (15)0.0015 (16)
C90.0383 (19)0.0254 (16)0.0283 (16)0.0049 (15)0.0017 (15)0.0020 (14)
C100.036 (2)0.0325 (17)0.0324 (18)0.0090 (15)−0.0008 (16)−0.0015 (15)
C110.0328 (19)0.0326 (17)0.0315 (18)−0.0003 (15)0.0062 (15)−0.0024 (15)
C120.044 (2)0.0280 (17)0.0366 (19)0.0059 (15)0.0014 (17)0.0056 (15)
C130.0362 (19)0.0326 (17)0.0397 (19)0.0112 (15)0.0006 (16)0.0040 (16)
S1—O11.414 (3)C3—H30.9500
S1—O21.415 (3)C3—C41.381 (5)
S1—O31.634 (3)C4—H40.9500
S1—C51.737 (3)C4—C51.390 (4)
O3—C81.391 (4)C5—C61.388 (5)
O4—N11.224 (4)C6—H60.9500
O5—N11.210 (4)C6—C71.381 (5)
O6—N21.231 (4)C7—H70.9500
O7—N21.228 (4)C8—C91.389 (5)
N1—C91.468 (5)C8—C131.389 (5)
N2—C111.465 (4)C9—C101.374 (5)
C1—H1A0.9800C10—H100.9500
C1—H1B0.9800C10—C111.378 (5)
C1—H1C0.9800C11—C121.379 (5)
C1—C21.507 (5)C12—H120.9500
C2—C31.387 (5)C12—C131.379 (5)
C2—C71.391 (5)C13—H130.9500
O1—S1—O2121.20 (17)C4—C5—S1118.8 (3)
O1—S1—O3102.73 (16)C6—C5—S1120.0 (2)
O1—S1—C5110.64 (16)C6—C5—C4121.2 (3)
O2—S1—O3107.40 (14)C5—C6—H6120.6
O2—S1—C5109.80 (17)C7—C6—C5118.8 (3)
O3—S1—C5103.27 (15)C7—C6—H6120.6
C8—O3—S1118.7 (2)C2—C7—H7119.4
O4—N1—C9116.5 (3)C6—C7—C2121.3 (3)
O5—N1—O4125.9 (3)C6—C7—H7119.4
O5—N1—C9117.6 (4)C9—C8—O3119.7 (3)
O6—N2—C11118.6 (3)C13—C8—O3120.6 (3)
O7—N2—O6123.2 (3)C13—C8—C9119.8 (3)
O7—N2—C11118.3 (3)C8—C9—N1120.8 (3)
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C10—C9—N1117.5 (3)
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C10—C9—C8121.6 (3)
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C9—C10—H10121.3
C2—C1—H1A109.5C9—C10—C11117.5 (3)
C2—C1—H1B109.5C11—C10—H10121.3
C2—C1—H1C109.5C10—C11—N2118.2 (3)
C3—C2—C1121.0 (3)C10—C11—C12122.3 (3)
C3—C2—C7118.5 (3)C12—C11—N2119.5 (3)
C7—C2—C1120.5 (3)C11—C12—H12120.2
C2—C3—H3119.2C11—C12—C13119.7 (3)
C4—C3—C2121.6 (3)C13—C12—H12120.2
C4—C3—H3119.2C8—C13—H13120.5
C3—C4—H4120.7C12—C13—C8119.1 (3)
C3—C4—C5118.6 (3)C12—C13—H13120.5
C5—C4—H4120.7
S1—O3—C8—C9101.6 (3)O7—N2—C11—C122.6 (5)
S1—O3—C8—C13−79.5 (4)N1—C9—C10—C11174.5 (3)
S1—C5—C6—C7−177.7 (3)N2—C11—C12—C13179.9 (3)
O1—S1—O3—C8−177.1 (2)C1—C2—C3—C4−179.7 (3)
O1—S1—C5—C421.1 (3)C1—C2—C7—C6−179.7 (4)
O1—S1—C5—C6−161.2 (3)C2—C3—C4—C5−0.7 (5)
O2—S1—O3—C854.0 (3)C3—C2—C7—C60.5 (5)
O2—S1—C5—C4157.5 (3)C3—C4—C5—S1178.3 (3)
O2—S1—C5—C6−24.8 (3)C3—C4—C5—C60.6 (5)
O3—S1—C5—C4−88.2 (3)C4—C5—C6—C70.0 (5)
O3—S1—C5—C689.5 (3)C5—S1—O3—C8−62.0 (3)
O3—C8—C9—N13.0 (5)C5—C6—C7—C2−0.6 (5)
O3—C8—C9—C10−179.9 (3)C7—C2—C3—C40.2 (5)
O3—C8—C13—C12−177.6 (3)C8—C9—C10—C11−2.7 (5)
O4—N1—C9—C844.8 (5)C9—C8—C13—C121.4 (5)
O4—N1—C9—C10−132.4 (4)C9—C10—C11—N2−177.5 (3)
O5—N1—C9—C8−136.9 (4)C9—C10—C11—C121.9 (5)
O5—N1—C9—C1046.0 (5)C10—C11—C12—C130.5 (5)
O6—N2—C11—C101.6 (5)C11—C12—C13—C8−2.2 (5)
O6—N2—C11—C12−177.8 (3)C13—C8—C9—N1−176.0 (3)
O7—N2—C11—C10−178.0 (3)C13—C8—C9—C101.1 (5)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3···O2i0.952.423.273 (5)149
C4—H4···O6ii0.952.573.486 (5)162
C7—H7···O7iii0.952.753.499 (5)137
C10—H10···O7iv0.952.513.233 (5)133
C12—H12···O4v0.952.343.087 (5)135
  17 in total

1.  Kinetics and mechanism of the aminolysis of 4-methylphenyl and 4-chlorophenyl 4-nitrophenyl carbonates in aqueous ethanol.

Authors:  Enrique A Castro; Mónica Andújar; Alejandra Toro; José G Santos
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 4.354

2.  Change in rate-determining step in an E1cB mechanism during aminolysis of sulfamate esters in acetonitrile.

Authors:  W J Spillane; P McGrath; C Brack; A B O'Byrne
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2001-09-21       Impact factor: 4.354

3.  The levelling effect of solvational imbalances in the reactions of oximate alpha-nucleophiles with electrophilic phosphorus centers. Relevance to detoxification of organophosphorus esters.

Authors:  F Terrier; E Le Guével; A P Chatrousse; G Moutiers; E Buncel
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Transition-state variation in the nucleophilic substitution reactions of aryl bis(4-methoxyphenyl) phosphates with pyridines in acetonitrile.

Authors:  Hai Whang Lee; Arun Kanti Guha; Chang Kon Kim; Ikchoon Lee
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  Effect of amine nature on reaction rate and mechanism in nucleophilic substitution reactions of 2,4-dinitrophenyl X-substituted benzenesulfonates with alicyclic secondary amines.

Authors:  Ik-Hwan Um; Sun-Mee Chun; Ok-Mi Chae; Mizue Fujio; Yuho Tsuno
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 4.354

6.  A kinetic study on nucleophilic displacement reactions of aryl benzenesulfonates with potassium ethoxide: role of K+ ion and reaction mechanism deduced from analyses of LFERs and activation parameters.

Authors:  Ik-Hwan Um; Ji-Sun Kang; Young-Hee Shin; Erwin Buncel
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.354

7.  Regioselectivity and the nature of the reaction mechanism in nucleophilic substitution reactions of 2,4-dinitrophenyl X-substituted benzenesulfonates with primary amines.

Authors:  Ik-Hwan Um; Jin-Young Hong; Jung-Joo Kim; Ok-Mi Chae; Sun-Kun Bae
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 4.354

8.  2-Nitro-p-phenyl-ene bis-(toluene-sulfonate).

Authors:  Xiujie Ji; Bowen Cheng; Jun Song; Chao Liu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-08-23

9.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

10.  The anatomy of a comprehensive constrained, restrained refinement program for the modern computing environment - Olex2 dissected.

Authors:  Luc J Bourhis; Oleg V Dolomanov; Richard J Gildea; Judith A K Howard; Horst Puschmann
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.