Literature DB >> 26396782

Crystal structure of 2,6-dimethyl-4-pyridone hemihydrate.

Dalena M Nguyen1, Vasumathi Desikan1, James A Golen2, David R Manke2.   

Abstract

The title compound (systematic name: 2,6-dimethyl-1H-pyridin-4-one hemihydrate), C7H9NO·0.5H2O, has a single planar mol-ecule in the asymmetric unit with the non-H atoms possessing a mean deviation from planarity of 0.021 Å. There is also half of a water mol-ecule present in the asymmetric unit. In the crystal, infinite (001) sheets are formed by N-H⋯O and O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; pyridones

Year:  2015        PMID: 26396782      PMCID: PMC4571382          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015012402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Related literature

For the crystal structure of the parent 4-pyridone, see: Jones (2001 ▸); Tyl et al. (2008 ▸). For the title compound bound to zirconium, see: Castillo et al. (1987 ▸). For the structure of a chloro-substituted variant of the title compound, see: Boer (1972 ▸).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H9NO·0.5H2O M = 132.16 Orthorhombic, a = 12.4859 (17) Å b = 14.3697 (19) Å c = 7.732 (1) Å V = 1387.3 (3) Å3 Z = 8 Cu Kα radiation μ = 0.73 mm−1 T = 120 K 0.5 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

Bruker Venture D8 CMOS diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014 ▸) T min = 0.554, T max = 0.754 11786 measured reflections 1366 independent reflections 1352 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.060

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.030 wR(F 2) = 0.078 S = 1.09 1366 reflections 95 parameters 3 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.15 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack x determined using 611 quotients [(I +)-(I -)]/[(I +)+(I -)] (Parsons et al., 2013 ▸. Absolute structure parameter: 0.05 (12)

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2014 ▸); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015012402/ff2139sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015012402/ff2139Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015012402/ff2139Isup3.cml Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015012402/ff2139fig1.tif Mol­ecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are drawn as spheres of arbitrary radius. Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015012402/ff2139fig2.tif Mol­ecular packing of the title compound with hydrogen bonding shown as dashed lines. CCDC reference: 1409189 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H9NO·0.5H2OF(000) = 568
Mr = 132.16Dx = 1.266 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Aba2Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
Hall symbol: A 2 -2acCell parameters from 9829 reflections
a = 12.4859 (17) Åθ = 7.1–72.4°
b = 14.3697 (19) ŵ = 0.73 mm1
c = 7.732 (1) ÅT = 120 K
V = 1387.3 (3) Å3NEEDLE, colourless
Z = 80.5 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm
Bruker Venture D8 CMOS diffractometer1366 independent reflections
Radiation source: microfocus Cu1352 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
HELIOS MX monochromatorRint = 0.060
φ and ω scansθmax = 72.4°, θmin = 7.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)h = −15→15
Tmin = 0.554, Tmax = 0.754k = −17→17
11786 measured reflectionsl = −9→9
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0453P)2 + 0.3383P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.078(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.09Δρmax = 0.15 e Å3
1366 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
95 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 611 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013.
3 restraintsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.05 (12)
Experimental. Absorption correction: SADABS-2014/4 (Bruker,2014) was used for absorption correction. wR2(int) was 0.1440 before and 0.0881 after correction. The Ratio of minimum to maximum transmission is 0.7350. The λ/2 correction factor is 0.00150.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.47723 (9)0.33620 (8)0.49203 (19)0.0287 (3)
O20.50000.50000.6889 (3)0.0399 (5)
N10.16883 (11)0.24949 (11)0.4446 (2)0.0215 (3)
C30.35308 (14)0.22232 (12)0.3962 (2)0.0234 (4)
H30.40830.18410.35040.028*
C20.24877 (14)0.19343 (12)0.3853 (2)0.0222 (4)
C40.38007 (12)0.30864 (12)0.4748 (2)0.0226 (4)
C70.09367 (14)0.39066 (13)0.5690 (3)0.0265 (4)
H7A0.06300.42100.46690.040*
H7B0.11580.43810.65270.040*
H7C0.03990.34990.62180.040*
C60.18900 (13)0.33399 (11)0.5164 (2)0.0217 (4)
C10.21576 (15)0.10115 (12)0.3125 (3)0.0270 (4)
H1A0.17360.06720.39880.040*
H1B0.27970.06500.28280.040*
H1C0.17240.11090.20850.040*
C50.29237 (13)0.36395 (12)0.5339 (2)0.0229 (4)
H50.30610.42260.58620.027*
H20.4956 (19)0.4524 (12)0.621 (3)0.034*
H10.1043 (9)0.2265 (14)0.444 (4)0.027*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0205 (5)0.0250 (6)0.0405 (8)−0.0007 (5)−0.0004 (6)−0.0028 (6)
O20.0553 (14)0.0318 (11)0.0324 (11)−0.0147 (10)0.0000.000
N10.0206 (6)0.0206 (7)0.0234 (7)−0.0014 (5)0.0004 (6)0.0008 (6)
C30.0240 (8)0.0215 (8)0.0246 (8)0.0035 (6)0.0014 (7)0.0012 (8)
C20.0268 (8)0.0193 (8)0.0205 (7)0.0009 (6)−0.0014 (7)0.0022 (7)
C40.0229 (8)0.0208 (8)0.0241 (9)0.0003 (6)−0.0011 (7)0.0038 (8)
C70.0245 (8)0.0243 (8)0.0309 (10)0.0025 (7)−0.0008 (7)−0.0041 (8)
C60.0244 (8)0.0196 (8)0.0213 (8)0.0009 (6)−0.0012 (7)0.0019 (7)
C10.0309 (9)0.0216 (8)0.0284 (10)−0.0005 (7)−0.0007 (8)−0.0012 (8)
C50.0255 (8)0.0174 (7)0.0258 (8)−0.0004 (6)−0.0006 (7)0.0004 (7)
O1—C41.283 (2)C7—H7A0.9800
O2—H20.862 (7)C7—H7B0.9800
N1—C21.362 (2)C7—H7C0.9800
N1—C61.359 (2)C7—C61.498 (2)
N1—H10.871 (7)C6—C51.367 (2)
C3—H30.9500C1—H1A0.9800
C3—C21.370 (2)C1—H1B0.9800
C3—C41.422 (3)C1—H1C0.9800
C2—C11.498 (2)C5—H50.9500
C4—C51.428 (2)
C2—N1—H1116.8 (15)C6—C7—H7A109.5
C6—N1—C2122.02 (14)C6—C7—H7B109.5
C6—N1—H1120.9 (16)C6—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C3—H3119.5N1—C6—C7116.70 (14)
C2—C3—C4121.06 (16)N1—C6—C5119.79 (15)
C4—C3—H3119.5C5—C6—C7123.49 (16)
N1—C2—C3119.80 (16)C2—C1—H1A109.5
N1—C2—C1116.63 (15)C2—C1—H1B109.5
C3—C2—C1123.57 (16)C2—C1—H1C109.5
O1—C4—C3122.52 (15)H1A—C1—H1B109.5
O1—C4—C5121.34 (16)H1A—C1—H1C109.5
C3—C4—C5116.14 (15)H1B—C1—H1C109.5
H7A—C7—H7B109.5C4—C5—H5119.4
H7A—C7—H7C109.5C6—C5—C4121.12 (16)
H7B—C7—H7C109.5C6—C5—H5119.4
O1—C4—C5—C6−179.53 (17)C2—C3—C4—C5−2.6 (3)
N1—C6—C5—C41.2 (3)C4—C3—C2—N12.5 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C60.7 (3)C4—C3—C2—C1−176.66 (16)
C2—N1—C6—C7177.28 (17)C7—C6—C5—C4−177.33 (17)
C2—N1—C6—C5−1.4 (3)C6—N1—C2—C3−0.5 (3)
C2—C3—C4—O1177.66 (16)C6—N1—C2—C1178.74 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O10.86 (1)1.96 (1)2.8174 (17)173 (2)
N1—H1···O1i0.87 (1)1.86 (1)2.7154 (18)166 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
O2H2O10.86(1)1.96(1)2.8174(17)173(2)
N1H1O1i 0.87(1)1.86(1)2.7154(18)166(3)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  A simple compound with an unexpectedly complex structure: 4-pyridone 6/5-hydrate.

Authors:  P G Jones
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2001-07-09       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Two polymorphs of anhydrous 4-pyridone at 100 K.

Authors:  Aleksandra Tyl; Maria Nowak; Joachim Kusz
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.