Literature DB >> 26396736

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children with chronic liver disease in North East Iran using PedsQL™ 4.0.

Shahrzad Tehranian1, Seyedali Jafari2, Jamshid Yousofi3, Mohammadali Kiani2, Saleh Seyedin3, Ali Khakshour4, Rita Bagherian5, Hasan Karami6, Hamidreza Kianifar7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a concept that relates to an individual's perception of health status in relation to the culture and value systems in which they live, in addition to their expectations, goals, concerns, and living standards. Considering the size of the population affected by Chronic Liver Diseases (CLDs) and the severity and chronic nature of the symptoms, there is an emerging need to evaluate the quality of life of patients using a standard protocol. The aim of this study is to assess the HRQOL in children with CLD based on child self-report and parent proxy-report forms.
METHODS: A total of 164 children, 55 CLD and 109 healthy children (aged 6-17 years), upon referral from the Pediatric Department at Ghaem Hospital in Mashhad from 2010 to 2014 were enrolled in this case-control study. We used the PedsQL(TM) 4.0 generic score scale to assess the HRQOL in children with CLD compared to the control group based on child self- and parent proxy reports.
RESULTS: According to the child self-reports, the total HRQOL in the case group (89.93±9.63) was significantly lower than control group (93.05±9.28) (p=0.006). We found significant differences in emotional functioning based on the CLD child self-reports (p=0.001) and their parent proxy-reports (p=0.002). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant correlation between the severity and physical functioning as reported by the Child-Pugh score (p=0.03, r= -0.31) and the MELD/PELD scores (p=0.01, r= -0.35), based on child self-reports. Gender, age of onset, CLD types, duration of the disease, and treatment showed no significant differences with total HRQOL.
CONCLUSION: HRQOL is significantly lower in children with CLD in comparison to the normal population. We strongly recommend considering different aspects of quality of life, especially emotional functioning concomitant to the therapy programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; chronic disease; liver disease; quality of life; questionnaire

Year:  2015        PMID: 26396736      PMCID: PMC4578542          DOI: 10.14661/2015.1214-1219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electron Physician        ISSN: 2008-5842


Introduction

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a concept that involves an individual’s perception of her or his health status in relation to the culture and value systems in which they live. In addition to their expectations, goals, concerns, and living standards, HRQOL takes into account the presence of physical, mental, and social well-being. This notion is influenced by the patients’ healthcare systems. Chronic liver disease (CLD) includes a broad spectrum of diseases, including viral and alcoholic hepatitis, and autoimmune and metabolic diseases, all of which may result in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinomas. Patients may suffer from different types of CLDs and concomitant symptoms, including fatigue, anorexia, pruritus, and depression. The long recrudescent course of the disease exerts considerable negative impact on patients’ health and lifestyle. Therefore, several arrangements and validated questionnaires have been designed to measure the HRQOL in CLD patients. In patients with CLDs, the severity of disease, as determined by stage of fibrosis or Child-Pugh scores, appears to have a considerable relationship with HRQOL. Considering the percentage of the general population affected by CLDs and the severity and chronic nature of the symptoms, a need emerges for evaluating the quality of life using standard protocol questionnaires in different age-groups. The aim of this study is to assess the HRQOL in children with CLD using the PedsQLTM 4.0 questionnaire based on child self-report and parent proxy-report forms. We assumed that CLD in children would exert a significant negative effect on their quality of life and the severity of the disease would also be a matter of importance.

Material and Methods

This was a prospective case-control study approved by the ethics committee of Islamic Azad University. Patients and their parents were informed of the purpose of the current trial and they signed informed consent forms before their enrollment. A total of 164 children (55 CLD and 109 healthy children) were recruited from the Pediatric Department at Ghaem Hospital in Mashhad from 2010 to 2014. Inclusion criteria included children and adolescents (aged 2 to 18 years old) affected by chronic liver disease without considering its etiology. Chronic disease was defined as a disease that lasted for 6 months or more for which there is no cure. Parents of patients did not suffered from any type of liver dysfunction. The current HRQOL questionnaire in pediatrics was designed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and consisted of the 23-item HRQOL generic core scales for children and teens aged 2 to 18 years old. We used the PedsQLTM 4.0 questionnaire Farsi version that evaluated the reliability, validity, and feasibility of the questioner in healthy Iranian children of the same age group. The PedsQLTM 4.0 generic core scale is a 23-item questionnaire of self and proxy reports consisting of 4 scales to evaluate physical, emotional, social, and academic functioning. A 5-point response scale ranges from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Each item is reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0–100 scale, with higher agreement placed at the top of the scale. Our participants were aged between 6 and 17 years and if the child or teen was unable to complete the self-report forms, the study administrator read a questionnaire aloud for them and avoided suggesting a specific answer by avoiding intonation change. Parents self-administered the PedsQLTM 4.0 after a brief instruction from the administrator. Upon entry, we also gathered the required demographic data and laboratory tests related to CLD to calculate Child–Pugh and MELD/PELD scores in the case group. The mean score of each scale was calculated for further statistical analysis. In order to measure the magnitude of the differences between two groups, we calculated the effect size defined as the difference between the means of the case and control groups, divided by the pooled standard deviation (SD). The most well-known benchmarks have been presented by Cohen, whereby 0.2 equates to a small effect, 0.5 equates to a medium effect, and effects larger than 0.8 equate are considered large (14). A negative effect size means that, on average, the control group performed better than case group. SPSS version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical procedures. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Chi-square analysis, Fisher’s exact test, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. P-values less than 0.05 was deemed to imply a statistically significant difference.

Results

Among the 164 participants, 55 CLD cases (27 boys and 28 girls) and 109 healthy individuals (52 boys and 56 girls) were enrolled and completed the questionnaire. We matched the two groups based on their ages (case=8.91±4.73 vs. control=8.97±4.54 years old), sex, and ethnicity. The demographic characteristics of our patients (Table 1) showed that the most common etiology of chronic liver disease was autoimmune hepatitis and metabolic diseases were the most common cause of cirrhosis (25.5%). Children and their parents completed the PedsQLTM 4.0 questionnaire independently and the final results are presented in Tables 2 and 3. According to the results, the total HRQOL of child self-report scores in the case group (89.93±9.63) was significantly lower (p=0.006) than CLD control group (93.05±9.28). While based on parent proxy-reports, total HRQOL was slightly higher in control group, but not statistically significantly different. The effective size for both reports were in the small range (Tables 2 and 3).
Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with chronic liver disease

Female, n1 (%)27 (49.1)
Male, n (%)28 (50.9)
Age of onset (months), mean (SD2)59.31 (59.36)
Duration of treatment (months), mean (SD)45.43 (25.8)
Course of disease (months), mean (SD)51.96 (29.67)
CHILD3, mean (SD)5.78 (1.15)
MELD/PELD4, mean (SD)9.67 (3.74)
Metabolic disease, n14
Cryptogenic cirrhosis, n11
Autoimmune hepatitis, n11
Wilson, n10
Chronic hepatitis B, n6
Cholestatic diseases, n3

n: Number;

SD: Standard deviation;

CHILD: Child-Pugh score;

MELD/PELD: Model for end-stage of Liver Disease/Pediatric end-stage liver disease

Table 2.

Child-self reports of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale scores in case and control groups

ScaleCaseControl
MeanSD1MeanSDP-valueEffect size
Physical functioning88.7817.5593.1110.630.176−0.14
Emotional functioning85.2512.6292.8712.240.001−0.29
Social functioning93.1518.9192.7412.650.3260.01
School functioning92.5915.5193.7212.980.993−0.03
Total mean score89.939.6393.059.280.006−0.16

SD: Standard deviation

Table 3.

Parent-proxy reports of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale scores in case and control groups

ScaleCaseControl
MeanSDMeanSDP-valueEffect size
Physical functioning84.0020.6987.5414.050.551−0.09
Emotional functioning78.4017.5085.9916.340.002−0.21
Social functioning88.4820.5087.6516.200.3440.02
School functioning87.7222.0489.7516.220.898−0.05
Total mean score86.7215.4287.8011.490.119−0.39

SD: Standard deviation

Comparing each scale in both groups, there was only a significant difference in emotional functioning based on the child self-reports (p=0.001) and total HRQOL score (p=0.006), with the majority of effect sizes in the small range (>0.2). According to the parent proxy-reports, HRQOL scores in children with CLD were statistically significant with regards to emotional functioning in comparison to the control group (p=0.002), with small effect sizes across all domains. The greatest negative effect size (−0.29) occurred in emotional functioning based on child self- and parent proxy reports. Moreover, the analysis showed significant correlation between CLD children and their parents‘ scores (p=0.001) on all four PedsQLTM 4.0 Generic scales (physical (r=0.723), emotional (r=0.726), social (r=0.528), and school (r=0.740) functions), with the greatest level of agreement with the PedsQLTM 4.0 school scale. There were no significant differences in total HRQOL scores between girls (88.66±12.16) and boys (91.27±5.986) in the children self-reports (p=0.865) and the parent proxy-reports (p=0.533). Our results found no correlation between age and total HRQOL considering child self-reports (r=0.133, p=0.227) and parent proxy-reports (r=0.554, p=0.082). We also evaluated the severity of CLD disease based on Child-Pugh and MELD/PELD scores in the case group (Table 4). Based on child self-reports, there was no statistically significant correlation between severity and HRQOL score scales, except that physical functioning was statistically related to the Child-Pugh score (p=0.03, r=−0.31) and MELD/PELD scores (p=0.01, r=−0.35). There was no significant relation between Child-Pugh and MELD/PELD scores and parent proxy-reports in case group (p<0.05, Table 4). Finally, based on child self- and parent proxy-reports, we found no significant relation between the onset age of CLD, types of CLD, duration of the disease, and treatment type.
Table 4.

Comparison of CHILD and MELD/PELD scores based on child-self and parent-proxy reports of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale scores in case group

ScaleCLD1 child self-reportParent proxy-report
CHILD2 scoreMELD/PELD3 scoreCHILD scoreMELD/PELD score
r 4P-valuerP-valuerP-valuerP-value
Physical functioning−0.3100.038−0.3590.016−0.2080.127−0.0090.946
Emotional functioning0.1120.4660.0630.679−0.0110.9380.1290.346
Social functioning0.2890.0540.1540.311−0.2000.143−0.1820.184
School functioning0.0430.7770.0590.7030.0210.8790.0450.744
Total mean score0.0840.5850.0980.5220.0950.4890.0250.858

CLD: Chronic liver disease;

CHILD: Child-Pugh score;

MELD/PELD: Model for End stage of Liver Disease/Pediatric end-stage liver disease;

r: Correlation coefficient

Discussion

In recent decades, there has been a rise in concern regarding HRQOL for different diseases. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the HRQOL of CLD children in Iran. In the current study, we assessed the HRQOL of children with CLD using the PedsQLTM 4.0 questionnaire, which is based on child self-report and parent proxy-reports. Our finding suggested a significantly lower emotional functioning and total HRQOL in CLD children, based on self-reports. Nydeggar et al. showed lower physical functioning in children with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) relative to non-HCV children. In Alonso et al.’s study, pediatric liver transplant recipients also scored significantly lower in physical and general health compared to the normative sample. In agreement with our results, several studies have reported that HRQOL in children with chronic diseases is lower than in the healthy population. These results can be explained by the fact that illness places a heavy burden on different aspects of their health, which changes their attitude towards life. As far as children are concerned, parents‘ judgment is of great value. To help define this relationship, our investigation revealed a correlation between CLD child self- and parent proxy-reports in all five scales. This result is in concordance with Alonso et al., which studied liver transplant in children and Gulati et al., where children with autoimmune disease were studied. A recent cross-sectional study by Sundaram (2013) showed moderate agreement across all scales, except social functioning in children with biliary atresia with their native livers. In our study, the strongest agreement was in school functioning that may represent parents’ higher ability to judge the observable health status in their children. According to a systematic review by Upton (2008), parents of affected children exhibit a tendency to underestimate child HRQOL. We also found a negative correlation between severity (Child-Pugh and MELD/PELD scores) and physical functioning based on child self-reporting. This result is supported by Younossi and Gutteling, who showed that disease severity was related to lower HRQOL scores in patients with CLD. These results differ from Häuser et al., which determined severity of disease had no effect on HRQOL. Parent-proxy reports showed no significant correlation with severity on any scale. Gender assessment in Afendy et al.’s study showed more HRQOL impairment in female patients with CLD. In contrast to their result, we found no differences between males and females in both child and parent reports, similar to the Zuberi and Häuser studies. Some studies have previously reported no relation between age and HRQOL in CLD patients. This result is in concordance with our own and in contrast to Younossi et al. who stated that more advanced age is associated with poorer HRQOL. Our results may originate in the negative health perceptions and emotional statuses that occur during chronic diseases that influence different aspects of life in every age group. Although the results of this study report lower HRQOL in children with CLD, a chronic liver disease-specific questionnaire accompanied with the PedsQLTM 4.0 questionnaire can shed light on other particular and negative effects CLD has on patients‘ health. A validated CLD-specific questionnaire in Farsi may be more helpful to reach the desirable goal.

Conclusions

In summary, these findings have various implications for future practice. Clinicians, healthcare, and policy makers should be more concerned with the practical value of measuring HRQOL. Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of parents being well acquainted with their child perception of quality of life and illness to help the children consciously adapt to the situation.
  26 in total

1.  Cross-sectional analysis of health-related quality of life in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Estella M Alonso; Christine A Limbers; Katie Neighbors; Karen Martz; John C Bucuvalas; Thomas Webb; James W Varni
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Development of a disease specific questionnaire to measure health related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Z M Younossi; G Guyatt; M Kiwi; N Boparai; D King
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Validity of the Spanish version of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) as a standard outcome for quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Montserrat Ferrer; Juan Córdoba; Olatz Garin; Gemma Olivé; Montserrat Flavià; Victor Vargas; Rafael Esteban; Jordi Alonso
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Health-related quality of life and family function following pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Estella M Alonso; Katie Neighbors; Franca B Barton; Sue V McDiarmid; Stephen P Dunn; George V Mazariegos; Jeanne M Landgraf; John C Bucuvalas
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 5.  The global impact of hepatic fibrosis and end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  Young-Suk Lim; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.126

6.  Health-related quality of life in pediatric liver transplant recipients: A single-center study.

Authors:  John C Bucuvalas; Maria Britto; Susan Krug; Frederick C Ryckman; Harry Atherton; Maria P Alonso; William F Balistreri; Uma Kotagal
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Validation of the German version of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire.

Authors:  Winfried Häuser; Martina Schnur; Ulf Steder-Neukamm; Fritz A Muthny; Daniel Grandt
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.566

8.  Long-term effects of treatment and response in patients with chronic hepatitis C on quality of life. An international, multicenter, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Geert Bezemer; Arthur R Van Gool; Elke Verheij-Hart; Bettina E Hansen; Yoav Lurie; Juan I Esteban; Martin Lagging; Francesco Negro; Stefan Zeuzem; Carlo Ferrari; Jean-Michel Pawlotsky; Avidan U Neumann; Solko W Schalm; Robert J de Knegt
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Measurement properties of the UK-English version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales.

Authors:  Penney Upton; Christine Eiser; Ivy Cheung; Hayley A Hutchings; Meriel Jenney; Alison Maddocks; Ian T Russell; John G Williams
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Impaired health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic conditions: a comparative analysis of 10 disease clusters and 33 disease categories/severities utilizing the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales.

Authors:  James W Varni; Christine A Limbers; Tasha M Burwinkle
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quality of Life of Patients with Wilson's Disease and Their Families.

Authors:  Ojas Unavane; Kritika Tiwari; Aabha Nagral; Ritika Aggarwal; Nikita Garg; Nishtha Nagral; Bela Verma; Ajay Jhaveri; Maninder S Setia
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2021-06-09

2.  The Assessment of the Quality of Life in Children with Chronic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Meliha Demiral; Tanju Başarır Özkan; Taner Özgür; Bige Özkan; Gülin Erdemir Eren; Derya Altay
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.555

3.  Evaluation of nutritional adjustment program on quality of life in children with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Jafari; Aramesh Rezaeian; Zahra Namjou; Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan; Zahra Ghaneifar
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-05-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.