Literature DB >> 26396507

The usefulness of age and sex to predict all-cause mortality in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a single-center cohort study.

Xiaoping Li1, Chi Cai2, Rong Luo3, Rongjian Jiang4, Jie Zeng4, Yijia Tang4, Yang Chen4, Michael Fu5, Tao He4, Wei Hua2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have shown that sex and age are associated with outcomes in patients with cardiomyopathy. The purpose of this study was to determine the all-cause mortality of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) by age and sex. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The patients were divided into non-elderly (age <60 years, n=811) and elderly (age ≥60 years, n=331) groups. No difference in the all-cause mortality rate was observed between elderly and non-elderly patients (27.2% vs 22.2%, log-rank χ(2)=2.604, P=0.107). Furthermore, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the male and female patients (23.3% vs 24.5%, log-rank χ(2)=0.707, P=0.400). However, subgroup analysis revealed that elderly male patients exhibited a higher mortality rate than non-elderly male patients (29.4% vs 21.3%, log-rank χ(2)=5.898, P=0.015), while no difference was observed between the elderly female patients and non-elderly female patients. In the Cox analysis, neither age nor sex was a significant independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with DCM.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, no significant difference in mortality between male and female patients or between the elderly and non-elderly patients was observed. Only among males was a difference in mortality observed; elderly male patients experienced greater mortality than that of non-elderly male patients. No effect of age or sex on all-cause mortality was observed in patients with DCM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dilated cardiomyopathy; elderly; prognosis; sex

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26396507      PMCID: PMC4577275          DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S88565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Interv Aging        ISSN: 1176-9092            Impact factor:   4.458


Introduction

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a disease of the heart muscle characterized by ventricular dilatation and impaired systolic function; this condition is the third most common cause of heart failure.1,2 The prognosis in patients with DCM is poor, with approximately half of all patients dying within 5 years of diagnosis; however, the prediction of death remains a challenge for clinicians.1,2 Age and sex are established risk factors of cardiovascular disease and death due to cardiovascular disease. The elderly and males have poor prognoses once heart failure occurs.3–7 In a meta-analysis, the Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure reported that the greatest predictor of mortality was age.3 The Framingham Heart Study found that the prognosis of women was significantly better than that of men.4,5 Similar observations have been reported in patients with advanced heart failure.6,7 Furthermore, hormone-replacement therapy appeared to improve survival in postmenopausal women with nonischemic heart failure.8 Recently, several studies have suggested that age and sex are also associated with the prognosis of DCM.9–16 Older age is reported to predict a poor prognosis,9–11 and several previous reports have shown a relationship between male sex and poor prognosis,12 although the data have been inconsistent, especially for pediatric DCM.12–16 In addition, most data on DCM outcomes are from the USA and European countries, and only few studies have investigated the prognosis of this disorder in Asian patients with DCM. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to evaluate the association of age and sex with all-cause mortality in hospitalized patients with DCM in the People’s Republic of China.

Subjects and methods

Patients and follow-up

A retrospective, observational cohort study of DCM patients was conducted from November 2003 to September 2011. The patients were admitted based on the presence of symptoms of decompensate heart failure and physical signs of heart failure, and DCM was defined as systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤50%) with left ventricular (LV) dilation in the absence of an apparent secondary cause of cardiomyopathy.17 Of the 1,317 enrolled patients, 175 patients were excluded from the study because they presented various forms of secondary cardiomyopathy (Figure 1). Thus, 1,142 patients were included in the final analysis. The endpoint of the study was the all-cause mortality, which was assessed for all patients using medical records and medical follow-up calls. Survival data were obtained for all study participants from hospitalization to death. Data from patients who underwent cardiac transplantation were no longer collected after transplantation. If a patient was alive at the end of the study, then the date of the most recent clinical evaluation was used. The mean follow-up was 3.6±2.3 years. The study was approved by the Ethics Commission of Fuwai Hospital.
Figure 1

Flowchart for participants in the present study.

Abbreviations: DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; Hb, hemoglobin.

Echocardiography

Patients underwent imaging in the left lateral decubitus position using a commercially available system equipped with a 3.5 MHz transducer. Two-dimensional gray-scale, pulsed, continuous, and color Doppler data were acquired in parasternal and apical views. For tissue Doppler imaging, the sector width was adjusted to obtain a frame rate of at least 115 frames/second. The LVEF was calculated using the biplane Simpson’s technique.18

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± SD or as medians and interquartile ranges. Comparisons of categorical variables among groups were made using chi-square tests. All tests were two-sided, and a value of P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to estimate the adjusted relative risks for various groups. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to adjust for any confounding variables among groups. The analyses were conducted using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 16.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Characteristics of the study population

Among the 1,142 patients, Han nationality people were 1,098 (96.1%) while minor nationality people were 44 (3.9%), patients lived in the North of Yangzi River were 991 (86.8%), and patients lived in the Southern of Yazi River were 151 (13.2%). Compared with the non-elderly patients (age <60 years, n=811), the elderly patients (age ≥60 years, n=331) were more likely to have atrial fibrillation or a stroke, had longer disease durations, higher systolic blood pressure (SBP), fasting blood glucose levels, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) levels, longer QRS durations, etc (Table 1). The prevalence of DCM was higher in male patients (n=836) than female patients (n=306). Compared with the female patients, the male patients were more likely to have a history of atrial fibrillation or diabetes, more likely to have shorter disease duration, higher diastolic blood pressure, larger left atria, and lower fasting blood glucose levels, etc (Table 1).
Table 1

Patient characteristics categorized by age and sex

VariablesAll patients(n=1,142)Age <60 years(n=811)Age ≥60 years(n=331)P-valueMale(n=836)Female(n=306)P-value
History
 Disease duration (years)2 (0.5–6)2 (0.45–5)4 (1–9)<0.0012 (0.45–6)3.5 (1–8)<0.001
 Arterial hypertension, n (%)303 (26.5)204 (25.2)99 (29.9)0.099244 (26.8)79 (25.8)0.740
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)163 (14.3)110 (13.6)53 (16.0)0.283108 (12.9)55 (18.0)0.031
 Stroke, n (%)51 (4.5)26 (3.2)25 (7.6)0.00137 (4.4)14 (4.6)0.914
 Atrial fibrillation, n (%)263 (23.0)159 (19.6)104 (31.4)<0.001207 (24.8)56 (18.3)0.022
 Ventricular premature beats, n (%)388 (34.0)263 (32.4)125 (37.8)0.215289 (34.6)99 (32.4)0.484
 Ventricular tachycardia, n (%)222 (19.4)158 (19.5)64 (19.3)0.955166 (19.9)56 (18.3)0.556
 Smoking, n (%)366 (32.7)397 (49.0)128 (38.7)0.002505 (60.4)20 (6.5)<0.001
 Alcohol use, n (%)229 (20.5)286 (35.3)85 (25.7)0.002364 (43.5)7 (2.3)<0.001
 NYHA class III and IV, n (%)836 (73.2)581 (71.6)255 (77.0)0.062607 (72.6)229 (74.8)0.451
Vital signs at admission
 SBP (mmHg)113.1±17.7111.7±17.8116.5±16.8<0.001113.1±17.7112.9±17.60.827
 DBP (mmHg)72.5±12.672.7±12.871.8±12.00.27272.9±12.671.1±12.60.031
 Heart rate, beat/min80.9±17.582.4±17.777.4±16.7<0.00181.3±17.980.0±16.50.269
Laboratory values at admission
 AST (IU/L)26 (20–35)27 (20–37)23 (19–32)0.08126 (20–36)24 (19–33)0.797
 ALT (IU/L)28 (19–45)31 (21–48)23 (16–35)0.01931 (21–48)22.5 (17–33)0.132
 TB (mmol/L)20.3 (15.1–30.675)21.2 (15.3–22.4)18.4 (14.9–27.25)<0.00121.5 (15.9–31.7)17.8 (14–27.2)<0.001
 DB (mmol/L)3.7 (2.5–6.5)3.8 (2.5–7.0)3.4 (2.4–5.925)<0.0013.9 (2.6–6.8)3.2 (2.2–6.1)0.049
 Glucose (mmol/L)5.62±1.845.49±1.705.94±2.12<0.0015.51±1.675.91±2.210.002
 TG (mmol/L)1.56±1.011.60±1.051.47±0.890.0681.52±0.931.68±1.200.020
 TC (mmol/L)4.61±1.134.60±1.174.63±1.040.6444.56±1.114.73±1.190.038
 Creatinine (µmol/L)92.7±35.190.1±32.499.0±40.2<0.00197.3±33.979.8±35.0<0.001
 BUN (µmol/L)7.95±3.967.59±3.478.85±4.88<0.0018.13±3.957.44±3.970.011
 Pro-NT BNP (fmol/mL)2,012.2±1,573.91,440 (751.8–2,775.4)1,809.6 (872.8–3,060.1)0.0201,560.4 (773.675–2,867.925)1,485.65 (812.325–2,804.025)0.849
Electrograph data
 QRS duration (ms)119.6±30.9117.1±29.9125.7±32.4<0.001119.1±30.1121.0±32.90.344
 QT (ms)405.7±54.2401.7±53.0415.4±56.2<0.001405.1±54.1407.4±54.80.528
 P (ms)107.5±21.6109.0±21.2103.2±22.40.001108.8±22.1104.1±20.10.005
 PR (ms)182.8±32.9180.7±31.1188.7±36.80.002183.0±33.1182.4±32.40.812
Echocardiography data
 LVd (mm)68.1±9.468.5±9.6266.9±8.670.01069.2±9.4265.0±8.56<0.001
 LVEF (mm)31.9±8.431.4±8.733.1±7.60.00331.8±8.632.2±7.90.456
 RV (mm)23.6±5.424.1±5.622.4±4.6<0.00124.1±5.622.4±4.7<0.001
 LA (mm)4.4.0±7.744.0±7.943.9±7.20.79944.7±7.841.9±7.2<0.001
Medications at admission
 Diuretics, n (%)1,081 (96.1)762 (94.0)319 (96.4)0.099792 (94.7)289 (94.4)0.846
 ACEI/ARB, n (%)969 (86.2)686 (84.6)283 (85.5)0.005708 (84.7)261 (85.3)0.801
 Beta-blockers, n (%)1,034 (91.9)744 (91.7)291 (87.9)0.044758 (90.7)277 (90.5)0.940
 Digoxin, n (%)921 (81.9)666 (82.1)255 (77.0)0.049676 (80.9)245 (80.1)0.763
 Spironolactone, n (%)1,036 (92.0)737 (90.9)229 (69.2)0.000758 (90.7)278 (90.8)0.926

Notes: 1) Data are expressed as the mean ± SD, medians (interquartile ranges), or as percentages. P-values were obtained from independent-sample t-tests. 2) A total of 24 patients lacked smoking status data, 25 patients lacked drinking status data, two lacked blood pressure data, 23 patients lacked electrocardiogram data, 47 patients lacked echocardiography data, 352 patients lacked NT-pro-BNP level data, 53 patients lacked fasting blood glucose level data, 35 patients lacked creatinine level data, 46 lacked BUN level data, 92 patients lacked triglyceride level data and total cholesterol level data, 78 lacked AST level data, 79 lacked ALT level data, 82 lacked TB level data, 83 lacked DB level data, and 17 lacked information about medications at admission. Bold data signifies P<0.05.

Abbreviations: NYHA, New York Heart Association; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; TG, triglyceride; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; TB, total bilirubin; DB, direct bilirubin; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal fragment pro-brain natriuretic peptide; LA, left atrium; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; ACEI, angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotension receptor blocker; TC, total cholesterol; LVd, ventricular diameter; RV, left ventricle.

Relationships between age, sex, and all-cause mortality

Among the 1,142 patients, 270 (23.6%) died and three (0.26%) underwent heart transplantation during a mean follow-up period of 3.6±2.3 years. There was trend toward higher all-cause mortality in the elderly compared with non-elderly patients; however, this did not reach statistical significance (27.2% vs 22.2%, log-rank χ2=2.604, P=0.107). Overall, there was no significant difference between mortality in the male and female patients with DCM (23.3% vs 24.5%, log-rank χ2=0.707, P=0.400; Figure 2).
Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the elderly (age ≥60 years) and non-elderly patients (age <60 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

Notes: (A) shows the survival curves for the elderly and non-elderly DCM patients (log-rank χ2=2.604, P=0.107). (B) shows the survival curves for the male and female patients with DCM (log-rank χ2=0.707, P=0.400).

To determine whether sex confers different degrees of mortality risk in elderly patients with DCM, the whole cohort was split into two subgroups. Among the male patients, a significantly different mortality was found in the elderly patients (n=211) compared with the non-elderly patients (n=625, 29.4% vs 21.3%, log-rank χ2=5.898, P=0.015), while no corresponding difference was found between female elderly patients (n=120) and female non-elderly patients (n=186, 23.3% vs 25.3%, log-rank χ2=1.062, P=0.303; Figure 3).
Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the elderly and non-elderly patients with DCM, stratified by sex ([A]: log-rank χ2=5.898, P=0.015 in male; [B]: log-rank χ2=1.062, P=0.303 in female).

Abbreviation: DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy.

On the other hand, to clarify whether age confers different degrees of mortality risk in different sex patients with DCM, the whole cohort was split into two subgroups. Among the non-elderly patients, no significantly different mortality was found in the male patients (n=625) compared with the female patients (n=186, 21.3% vs 25.3%, log-rank χ2=3.072, P=0.080). Similarly, no corresponding difference was found between the elderly male (n=211) and female patients (n=120, 29.4% vs 23.3%, log-rank χ2=1.725, P=0.189; Figure 4).
Figure 4

Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the male and female patients with DCM, stratified by age ([A]: log-rank χ2=3.072, P=0.080 in non-elderly; [B]: log-rank χ2=2.725, P=0.189 in elderly).

Abbreviation: DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy.

Cox proportional hazard models

Univariate analysis of the clinical, laboratory, electrographic, and electrocardiographic data revealed that ventricular premature beats, disease course, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, SBP, QRS duration, LV diameter, LVEF, right ventricular diameter, left atrial diameter, NT-pro-BNP levels, creatinine levels, and fasting blood glucose levels were significant predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with DCM. Neither age nor sex was entered into the Cox multivariate analysis. After adjusting for age, sex, tobacco smoking, alcohol use, right ventricular diameter, and LVEF, Cox multivariate analysis showed that ventricular premature beats, SBP, QRS duration, left atrium diameter, and fasting blood glucose levels were the strongest independent predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with DCM. Neither age nor sex was a predictor of all-cause mortality in the present study (Table 2).
Table 2

Cox regression of all-cause mortality in patients with DCM

VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
Age1.0070.998–1.0170.1351.0040.991–1.0160.551
Sex1.2030.892–1.6240.2261.2930.887–1.8870.182
Ventricular premature beat1.4471.137–1.8420.0031.3541.017–1.8020.038
NYHA functional class1.5881.352–1.866<0.0011.2230.990–1.5110.062
Disease duration1.0271.010–1.0440.0011.0120.990–1.0350.291
Smoker0.9710.848–1.1100.6630.9820.812–1.1870.853
Drinker0.8910.765–1.0390.1400.9470.768–1.1680.612
Systolic blood pressure0.9820.975–0.989<0.0010.9840.975–0.9940.001
QRS duration1.0091.006–1.013<0.0011.0101.005–1.014<0.001
Left ventricle1.0371.024–1.050<0.0011.0030.983–1.0220.789
Right ventricle1.0631.039–1.087<0.0011.0150.985–1.0450.329
Left atrium1.0551.040–1.070<0.0011.0471.025–1.069<0.001
LVEF0.9640.950–0.979<0.0010.9800.960–1.0010.057
NT-pro-BNP5.6653.587–8.945<0.001
FBG1.0981.043–1.156<0.0011.0981.027–1.1740.006
Creatinine1.0041.002–1.0070.0011.0031.000–1.0060.053

Notes: The variables analyzed in the multivariate Cox mode included age, sex, ventricular premature beat, drinking and smoke status, disease duration, NYHA functional classes, systolic blood pressure, QRS duration, left ventricular, right ventricle, left atrium diameter, LVEF, FBG, and creatinine. Bold data signifies P<0.05.

Abbreviations: DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; NYHA, New York Heart Association; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal fragment pro-brain natriuretic peptide; FBG, fasting blood glucose; CI, confidence interval; HR, Hazard ratio.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the associations between age, sex, and all-cause mortality in patients with DCM. Our findings suggest that age and sex offered predictive value for all-cause mortality only in the male subgroup of DCM patients; the elderly male patients exhibited significantly higher all-cause mortality than that of the non-elderly male patients. However, neither age nor sex was independent predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with DCM. The present data confirm that DCM was less common in women than in men, as has been shown previously.19–21 In the present study, men were cigarette smokers more frequently than women. Renal failure, an important prognostic factor in heart failure, was also more common in men; however, women had diabetes more often than men. These findings are in agreement with recent data.20,21 In the present study, although no difference in all-cause mortality was observed between the male and female patients or between the elderly and non-elderly patients, elderly male patients exhibited higher mortality rates than those of non-elderly male patients. Griffin et al first partitioned the data by age at diagnosis in children and suggested a relationship between age and outcome; older children had worse outcomes.13 In Australia, a national population-based study of DCM found that age was one of the risk factors for mortality in DCM.14 Similarly, a New Zealand study also found a difference in survival rates across ages.10 However, despite their other positive findings, Chen et al did not find an age-related difference in mortality.15 Likewise, Venugopalan et al did not find an age difference when comparing mortality or disease progression with recovery.16 In a nationwide study of DCM in Japan, it was found that both male sex and higher age were among the five strongest predictors of mortality.10 There was no standard criterion for elderly as various countries and societies consider the different onset of elderly age. Most developed Western countries set the age of 65 years for elderly, while the United Nations and developing countries have agreed that 60 years may be usually denoted as old age.22–24 As a developing country and according to the standard of Chinese Geriatrics Society on elderly, cutoff for elderly was 60 years in the present study.25 The main outcomes did not change even if we took the cutoff for elderly as 65 years in the Kaplan–Meier survival and Cox analyses; there was still no difference between the non-elderly and elderly patients (22.4% vs 29%, log-rank χ2=3.247, P=0.072). Sex differences in the cardiovascular system have largely been attributed to the effects of sex steroid hormones, such as estrogen and testosterone. The effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system include rapid vasodilatation, reduced vessel-wall responses to injury, reduced development of atherosclerosis, and the prevention of apoptosis in cardiac myocytes during heart failure.26–28 Testosterone inversely influences myocardial remodeling after myocardial infarction and activates nuclear factor-κB, which contributes to inflammatory mechanisms.29–31 In the murine model of DCM, the 6-month survival rate was significantly better in females than in males, and basal and isoproterenol-stimulated fractional shortening were preserved in female transgenic mice.32 In male and female spontaneously hypertensive rats, aged male rats showed a significant reduction in the peak stroke volume index and an increase in the end-diastolic volume index compared with age-matched control rats.33 Echeverria et al found that LV function is better preserved in women than in men presenting with congestive heart failure.34 A study by Olivetti et al of autopsy tissue from patients free of cardiovascular disease found that aging is associated with cardiac myocyte cell loss and reactive hypertrophy in men but not in women.35 Their findings suggest that the myocardium of men, especially elderly men, may be more vulnerable to the effects of cardiac damage compared with that of elderly women. The present study has several limitations. Like all hospital-based cohorts, this study sample was drawn from a selected population of patients who had been referred for treatment. Because the NT-pro-BNP test was not commonly used until the later years of this study and NT-pro-BNP test data were missing for 352 patients, we excluded this data from the multivariate Cox analysis to avoid a potential confound in the statistical analyses. A total of 14.4% patients (n=165) were lost to follow-up because of circumstances beyond our control, such as the lack of communication in rural areas, and the main outcomes did not change if we removed these individuals who were lost to follow-up from the Kaplan–Meier survival and Cox analyses. Ideally, all patients with DCM should be shown to be free of coronary artery disease. In practice, however, coronary arteriography is not routinely performed in all patients with congestive heart failure. Because retrospective studies cannot control the conditions under which patients are recruited or investigated, it follows that most retrospective studies of DCM have to compromise on the completeness of data on coronary artery disease in their subjects. In an Icelandic study, three-fourths of the patients were shown to have normal coronary arteries;36 however, no coronary imaging results were obtained in a UK questionnaire-based study.37 A previous retrospective study, based on the entire Mayo Clinic practice, including referral patients, found angiographic evidence of normal coronary arteries in 58% of DCM patients.9 A very small subgroup with ischemic heart disease was observed in the present study compared with the expected proportion. Moreover, aside from those patients who had previously undergone coronary artery angiography, coronary computerized tomography (CT) scan, or cardiac radionuclide imaging in other hospitals, only 334 patients underwent coronary artery angiography in the present study and only 80 of these patients were found to have coronary artery disease at our hospital. Despite these limitations in the present study on patients with DCM, we conclude that there was no significant difference in mortality between the male and female patients or between the elderly and non-elderly patients. Elderly male patients experienced greater mortality than non-elderly male patients. Neither age nor sex played an important role in all-cause mortality in patients with DCM.
  34 in total

1.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Clinical features and outcomes of childhood dilated cardiomyopathy: results from a national population-based study.

Authors:  Piers E F Daubeney; Alan W Nugent; Patty Chondros; John B Carlin; Steven D Colan; Michael Cheung; Andrew M Davis; C W Chow; Robert G Weintraub
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Prognosis and prognostic factors in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in Japan.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Miura; Akira Matsumori; Ali Nasermoaddeli; Yoshiyuki Soyama; Yuko Morikawa; Masaru Sakurai; Akira Kitabatake; Masaki Nagai; Yutaka Inaba; Hideaki Nakagawa
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.993

4.  Testosterone enhances early cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction, causing rupture and degrading cardiac function.

Authors:  Maria A Cavasin; Zhen-Yin Tao; Ai-Li Yu; Xiao-Ping Yang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Nuclear factor-kappaB activation leads to down-regulation of fatty acid oxidation during cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors:  Anna Planavila; Juan C Laguna; Manuel Vázquez-Carrera
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Gender differences in survival in advanced heart failure. Insights from the FIRST study.

Authors:  K F Adams; C A Sueta; M Gheorghiade; C M O'Connor; T A Schwartz; G G Koch; B Uretsky; K Swedberg; W McKenna; J Soler-Soler; R M Califf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Estrogen prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis through inhibition of reactive oxygen species and differential regulation of p38 kinase isoforms.

Authors:  Jin Kyung Kim; Ali Pedram; Mahnaz Razandi; Ellis R Levin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Female sex is associated with a better long-term survival in patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Finn Gustafsson; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Hans Burchardt; Pernille Buch; Marie Seibaek; Erik Kjøller; Ida Gustafsson; Lars Køber
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Gender differences in in-hospital management and outcomes in patients with decompensated heart failure: analysis from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE).

Authors:  Marie Galvao; Jill Kalman; Teresa DeMarco; Gregg C Fonarow; Catherine Galvin; Jalal K Ghali; Robert M Moskowitz
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.712

10.  The 'real' woman with heart failure. Impact of sex on current in-hospital management of heart failure by cardiologists and internists.

Authors:  C Opasich; S De Feo; G A Ambrosio; P Bellis; A Di Lenarda; G Di Tano; D Fico; L Gonzini; R Lavecchia; C Tomasi; Aldo P Maggioni
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 15.534

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cardiac magnetic resonance and galectin-3 level as predictors of prognostic outcomes for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients.

Authors:  Da-Jun Hu; Jing Xu; Wei Du; Jian-Xin Zhang; Min Zhong; Ya-Nan Zhou
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  New Insights in RBM20 Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  D Lennermann; J Backs; M M G van den Hoogenhof
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2020-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.