Literature DB >> 26396232

Referral outcomes of attendances at general practitioner led urgent care centres in London, England: retrospective analysis of hospital administrative data.

Thomas E Cowling1, Farzan Ramzan1, Tim Ladbrooke2, Hugh Millington3, Azeem Majeed1, Shamini Gnani1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify patient and attendance characteristics that are associated with onwards referral to co-located emergency departments (EDs) or other hospital specialty departments from general practitioner (GP) led urgent care centres (UCCs) in northwest London, England.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of administrative data recorded in the UCCs at Charing Cross and Hammersmith Hospitals, in northwest London, from October 2009 to December 2012. Attendances made by adults resident in England were included. Logistic regression was used to model the associations between the explanatory variables-age; sex; ethnicity; socioeconomic status; area of residence; distance to UCC; GP registration; time, day, quarter, year; and UCC of attendance-and the outcome of onwards referral to the co-located EDs or other hospital specialty departments.
RESULTS: Of 243 042 included attendances, 74.1% were managed solely within the UCCs without same day referral to the EDs (16.8%) or other hospital specialty departments (5.7%), or deferred referral to a fracture, hand management or soft tissue injury management clinic (3.3%). The adjusted odds of onwards referral was estimated to increase by 19% (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.19) for a 10 year increase in a patient's age. Men, patients registered with a GP and residents of less socioeconomically deprived areas were also more likely to be referred onwards from the UCCs.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients, across each category of all explanatory variables, were managed solely within the UCCs, although a large absolute number of patients were referred onwards each year. Several characteristics of patients and their attendances were associated with the outcome variable. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  emergency care systems, emergency departments; emergency care systems, primary care; hospitalisations

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26396232     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Yonder: Suicide, rhinosinusitis, urgent care centres, and favourite patients.

Authors:  Ahmed Rashid
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  The impact of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a rapid realist review.

Authors:  Alison Cooper; Freya Davies; Michelle Edwards; Pippa Anderson; Andrew Carson-Stevens; Matthew W Cooke; Liam Donaldson; Jeremy Dale; Bridie Angela Evans; Peter D Hibbert; Thomas C Hughes; Alison Porter; Tim Rainer; Aloysius Siriwardena; Helen Snooks; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Co-location of out of hours primary care and emergency department in Belgium: patients' and physicians' view.

Authors:  Birgitte Schoenmakers; Jasper Van Criekinge; Timon Boeve; Jonas Wilms; Chris Van Der Mullen; Marc Sabbe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Healthcare use among preschool children attending GP-led urgent care centres: a descriptive, observational study.

Authors:  S Gnani; S Morton; F Ramzan; M Davison; T Ladbrooke; A Majeed; S Saxena
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Factors associated with inappropriate use of emergency departments: findings from a cross-sectional national study in France.

Authors:  Diane Naouri; Guillaume Ranchon; Albert Vuagnat; Jeannot Schmidt; Carlos El Khoury; Youri Yordanov
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 7.035

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.