Literature DB >> 26396010

Rescheduling the process of nanoparticle removal used for water mercury remediation can increase the risk to aquatic organism: evidence of innate immune functions modulation in European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.).

Leonor C Costa1, Iram Mohmood1, Tito Trindade2, Mohammad Saleem3, Armando C Duarte1, Eduarda Pereira1, Iqbal Ahmad4,5.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the mechanisms of innate immune function responses to silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticle functionalized with dithiocarbamate groups (IONP) exposure alone and its associated mercury (Hg) in European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) phagocytes isolated from peritoneum (P-phagocytes), gill (G-phagocytes), head kidney (HK-phagocytes) and spleen (S-phagocytes). The study evaluated viability, phagocytosis, oxidative burst activity (OBA) and lipid peroxidation (LPO). Four groups were made: (1) 2 × 10(6) phagocytes + RPMI-1640 (control), (2) 2 × 10(6) phagocytes + IONP (2.5 mg L(-1)), (3) 2 × 10(6) phagocytes + Hg (50 μg L(-1)) and (4) 2 × 10(6) phagocytes + IONP + Hg. Samplings were performed at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 h of exposure. A. anguilla P-, G-, HK- and S-phagocytes in vitro exposure to IONP alone revealed either increased (except HK-phagocytes at 16 h) or no change in viability, suggesting that the cells are metabolically active and resistant to IONP exposure alone. In terms of phagocytes overactivation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production as an indirect mechanism of immunotoxicity, the phagocytes responded in the following manner: P- > S- > HK- = G-phagocytes for IONP exposure alone, S- > HK- > P- = G-phagocytes for Hg exposure alone and HK- > G- = S- > P-phagocytes for concomitant exposure. Overall, considering Hg as a surrogate for metals and its association with IONP, as well as the likelihood that it could pose a serious threat to aquatic organisms by modulating their immune defense mechanisms if accidentally discharged into the aquatic environment, current results suggest that the step of IONP-metal complex removal must not be underrated and should be processed without any more ado.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anguilla anguilla L.; In vitro immunotoxicity; Iron oxide nanoparticles; Mercury; Metal removal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26396010     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5375-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  59 in total

1.  Magnetic mesoporous materials for removal of environmental wastes.

Authors:  Byoung Chan Kim; Jinwoo Lee; Wooyong Um; Jaeyun Kim; Jin Joo; Jin Hyung Lee; Ja Hun Kwak; Jae Hyun Kim; Changha Lee; Hongshin Lee; R Shane Addleman; Taeghwan Hyeon; Man Bock Gu; Jungbae Kim
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 2.  Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects.

Authors:  Stephen J Klaine; Pedro J J Alvarez; Graeme E Batley; Teresa F Fernandes; Richard D Handy; Delina Y Lyon; Shaily Mahendra; Michael J McLaughlin; Jamie R Lead
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 3.  The role of the macrophage in immune regulation.

Authors:  S Gordon
Journal:  Res Immunol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

4.  Interference of the co-exposure of mercury with silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles can modulate genotoxicity induced by their individual exposures--a paradox depicted in fish under in vitro conditions.

Authors:  Iram Mohmood; Iqbal Ahmad; Mohammad Asim; Leonor Costa; Cláudia B Lopes; Tito Trindade; Armando C Duarte; Eduarda Pereira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Immunosuppressive effects of aflatoxin in growing rats.

Authors:  S Raisuddin; K P Singh; S I Zaidi; B N Paul; P K Ray
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 6.  Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress.

Authors:  M Valko; H Morris; M T D Cronin
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Iron toxicity and antioxidant nutrients.

Authors:  Cesar G Fraga; Patricia I Oteiza
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 4.221

8.  Comparative toxicity of CuO nanoparticles and CuSO4 in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Gloria Isani; Maria Letizia Falcioni; Gianni Barucca; Durairaj Sekar; Giulia Andreani; Emilio Carpenè; Giancarlo Falcioni
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 6.291

9.  Toxicity assessment of iron oxide nanoparticles in zebrafish (Danio rerio) early life stages.

Authors:  Xiaoshan Zhu; Shengyan Tian; Zhonghua Cai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  In vivo evaluation of the biodistribution and safety of PLGA nanoparticles as drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Boitumelo Semete; Laetitia Booysen; Yolandy Lemmer; Lonji Kalombo; Lebogang Katata; Jan Verschoor; Hulda S Swai
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.307

View more
  2 in total

1.  Phagocytic cell responses to silica-coated dithiocarbamate-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles and mercury co-exposures in Anguilla anguilla L.

Authors:  Leonor Costa; Iram Mohmood; Tito Trindade; Naser A Anjum; Armando C Duarte; Eduarda Pereira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Innate Immunity Provides Biomarkers of Health for Teleosts Exposed to Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Débora Torrealba; Juan A More-Bayona; Jeremy Wakaruk; Daniel R Barreda
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 7.561

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.