Literature DB >> 26395849

Neonicotinoid insecticide residues in soil dust and associated parent soil in fields with a history of seed treatment use on crops in southwestern Ontario.

Victor Limay-Rios1, Luis Gabriel Forero1, Yingen Xue1, Jocelyn Smith1, Tracey Baute2, Arthur Schaafsma1.   

Abstract

Using neonicotinoid insecticides as seed treatments is a common practice in field crop production. Exposure of nontarget organisms to neonicotinoids present in various environmental matrices is debated. In the present study, concentrations of neonicotinoid residues were measured in the top 5 cm of soil and overlying soil surface dust before planting in 25 commercial fields with a history of neonicotinoid seed treatment use in southwestern Ontario in 2013 and 2014 using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. The mean total concentrations were 3.05 ng/g and 47.84 ng/g in 2013 and 5.59 ng/g and 71.17 ng/g in 2014 for parent soil and soil surface dust, respectively. When surface and parent soil residues were compared the mean concentration in surface dust was 15.6-fold and 12.7-fold higher than that in parent soil in 2013 and 2014, respectively. Pooled over years, the surface dust to parent soil ratio was 13.7, with mean concentrations of 4.36 ng/g and 59.86 ng/g for parent soil and surface dust, respectively. The present study's results will contribute important knowledge about the role these residues may play in the overall risk assessment currently under way for the source, transport, and impact of neonicotinoid insecticide residues in a maize ecosystem.
© 2015 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clothianidin; Concentration; Pesticide; Surface; Thiamethoxam

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26395849     DOI: 10.1002/etc.3257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  16 in total

1.  Fate and transport of furrow-applied granular tefluthrin and seed-coated clothianidin insecticides: Comparison of field-scale observations and model estimates.

Authors:  Kara E Huff Hartz; Tracye M Edwards; Michael J Lydy
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013.

Authors:  Thomas James Wood; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  QSAR modeling in ecotoxicological risk assessment: application to the prediction of acute contact toxicity of pesticides on bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Mabrouk Hamadache; Othmane Benkortbi; Salah Hanini; Abdeltif Amrane
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Association between pesticide exposure and colorectal cancer risk and incidence: A systematic review.

Authors:  Eryn K Matich; Jonathan A Laryea; Kathryn A Seely; Shelbie Stahr; L Joseph Su; Ping-Ching Hsu
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 7.129

5.  Non-cultivated plants present a season-long route of pesticide exposure for honey bees.

Authors:  Elizabeth Y Long; Christian H Krupke
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Larval exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid impacts adult size in the farmland butterfly Pieris brassicae.

Authors:  Penelope R Whitehorn; George Norville; Andre Gilburn; Dave Goulson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Long-term effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on ants.

Authors:  Daniel Schläppi; Nina Kettler; Lars Straub; Gaétan Glauser; Peter Neumann
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-06-26

8.  Neonicotinoid insecticide residues in subsurface drainage and open ditch water around maize fields in southwestern Ontario.

Authors:  Arthur W Schaafsma; Victor Limay-Rios; Tracey S Baute; Jocelyn L Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Long-term field-realistic exposure to a next-generation pesticide, flupyradifurone, impairs honey bee behaviour and survival.

Authors:  Simone Tosi; James C Nieh; Annely Brandt; Monica Colli; Julie Fourrier; Herve Giffard; Javier Hernández-López; Valeria Malagnini; Geoffrey R Williams; Noa Simon-Delso
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-28

10.  Meta-analysis reveals that seed-applied neonicotinoids and pyrethroids have similar negative effects on abundance of arthropod natural enemies.

Authors:  Margaret R Douglas; John F Tooker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.