Literature DB >> 26395316

QALYs in cost-effectiveness analysis: an overview for cardiologists.

Olivier J Wouters1, Huseyin Naci1, Nilesh J Samani2.   

Abstract

In recent years, cost-effectiveness data have strongly influenced clinical practice guidelines for several cardiovascular treatments. Economic considerations are increasingly common as health systems are under mounting pressure to maximise value for money. The quality-adjusted life year (QALY)-an outcome measure that expresses the duration and quality of life-is the main pillar of cost-effectiveness analyses. It is widely used in assessments of the clinical and economic value of new cardiovascular treatments, but how the QALY is derived is often unclear to clinicians. In this article, we first explain how QALYs are defined and calculated. We then review a selected set of cost-effectiveness analyses of recently introduced cardiovascular treatments and outline how these studies derived their QALYs. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the QALY and how the presentation of the measure could be improved in cost-effectiveness studies. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Keywords:  CARDIAC PROCEDURES AND THERAPY

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26395316     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  8 in total

1.  Rituximab in generalized myasthenia gravis: Clinical, quality of life and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  João Peres; Rita Martins; José Delgado Alves; Ana Valverde
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2017-03-11

Review 2.  Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries.

Authors:  Aris Angelis; Ansgar Lange; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-16

3.  Probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH vs. human menopausal gonadotropin for women undergoing IVF.

Authors:  F S Mennini; A Marcellusi; R Viti; C Bini; A Carosso; A Revelli; C Benedetto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  A novel etanercept biosimilar Anbainuo plus methotrexate exhibits increased cost-effectiveness compared to conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in treating rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Feng Tian; Jing-Yang Li; Zhen-Hua Wen; Xiao-Wen Luo; Li Deng; Liang Zhang; Jing-Yun He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Evaluating the Benefits of New Drugs in Health Technology Assessment Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study on Metastatic Prostate Cancer With the Dental and Pharmaceuticals Benefits Agency (TLV) in Sweden.

Authors:  Aris Angelis
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2018-09-15

6.  Cost-effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulant vs. Warfarin Among Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Intermediate Stroke Risk.

Authors:  Ju Hee Choi; Woojin Kim; Yun Tae Kim; Jaelim Cho; Seung Yong Shin; Changsoo Kim; Jin-Bae Kim
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-11

7.  Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Testing of Yoruba Version of the EQ-5D Questionnaire in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Authors:  Francis Fatoye; Abiodun Emmanuel Akinfala; Tadesse Gebrye; Clara Fatoye; Titilope Faith Ojelade; Olufemi Oyeleye Oyewole; Chidozie Emmanuel Mbada
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-27

8.  Multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment: a simulation exercise on metastatic colorectal cancer with multiple stakeholders in the English setting.

Authors:  Aris Angelis; Gilberto Montibeller; Daniel Hochhauser; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.