| Literature DB >> 26394400 |
Bo Song1, Lulu Pei1, Hui Fang1, Lu Zhao1, Yuan Gao1, Yuanyuan Wang1, Song Tan2, Yuming Xu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26394400 PMCID: PMC4579076 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
RRE-90 scale.
| RRE | |
|---|---|
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| |
|
| 1 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 0 |
The components of the RRE score showed the rules the study achieved the raw data.
TIA indicates transient ischemic attack.
Clinical characteristics of image-complete group and image-incomplete group.
| Image-complete | Image-incomplete | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | ||
|
| 258 (41.9) | 20 (39.2) | 0.711 |
|
| 282 (45.8) | 20 (39.2) | 0.366 |
|
| 114 (18.5) | 6 (11.8) | 0.229 |
|
| 65 (10.6) | 8 (15.7) | 0.259 |
|
| 11 (1.8) | 0 (0) | — |
|
| 339 (55.0) | 26 (51.0) | 0.577 |
|
| 86 (14.0) | 5 (9.8) | 0.406 |
|
| 88 (14.3) | 9 (17.6) | 0.513 |
|
| 132 (21.4) | 10 (19.6) | 0.760 |
|
| 4 (0.6) | 0 (0) | — |
|
| 84 (13.6) | 9 (17.6) | 0.427 |
|
| 73 (11.9) | 8 (15.7) | 0.421 |
|
| 242 (39.3) | 20 (39.2) | 0.992 |
|
| 260 (42.2) | 22 (43.1) | 0.897 |
|
| 153 (24.8) | 14 (27.5) | 0.679 |
The comparison of baseline characteristics of Image-complete group and Image-incomplete group showed no significant differences (P>0.05).
Fig 1Flow diagram defining the potentially eligible TSI patients.
The flow diagram was used to illustrate how the study population was selected.
The risk of stroke for DWI positive patients (TSI) and DWI negative patients.
| DWI | Patient No. | Follow-up No. | Stroke No. | Risk, % (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 241 | 238 | 50 | 21.01(15.83–26.19) |
|
| 392 | 382 | 19 | 4.97(2.79–7.15) |
|
| 633 | 620 | 69 | 11.13(8.65–13.61) |
Stroke risk for TSI patients was substantially higher than DWI negative patients (P<0.01).
CI indicates confidence interval.
Fig 2Ninety-day receiver-operating characteristic curves as a predictive value of the RRE score and ABCD2 score.
The RRE score showed better discrimination (Z = 2.115, P = 0.0344) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.681 (95%CI, 0.592–0.771) than ABCD2 score (C statistics = 0.546; 95% CI, 0.454–0.638).
Discrimination abilities of each point about the RRE score.
| Score | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Youden index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.100 | 0.000 | 0.208 | NA | 0 |
|
| 0.978 | 0.051 | 0.213 | 0.900 | 0.029 |
|
| 0.891 | 0.206 | 0.228 | 0/878 | 0.097 |
|
| 0.783 | 0.452 | 0.273 | 0.888 | 0.235 |
|
| 0.630 | 0.726 | 0.377 | 0.882 | 0.356 |
|
| 0.174 | 0.926 | 0.381 | 0.810 | 0.100 |
|
| 0.000 | 0.100 | NA | 0.792 | 0 |
TSI patients were divided into low RRE group (0–3) and high RRE group (4–6) based on optimal cut-off point which represents maximum Youden index.
PPV indicates positive predictive value; NPV indicates negativve predictive value; NA indicates not applicable.
*maximumYouden index.
Fig 3Kaplan–Meier curves of patients stratified according to the RRE score. Cum indicates cumulative.
The Kaplan–Meier curves showed a significant difference between the low- (RRE<4) and high-risk (RRE≥4) categories (log-rank test = 21.444, P<0.001).
The risk for stroke of each RRE score after TSI.
| Score | Patient No | Stroke No. | Risk, % (95%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 10 | 1 | 10.00(0.25–55.72) |
|
| 31 | 4 | 12.90(3.52–33.04) |
|
| 48 | 5 | 10.42(3.38–24.31) |
|
| 55 | 7 | 12.73(5.12–26.22) |
|
| 56 | 21 | 37.50(23.21–57.32) |
|
| 21 | 8 | 38.10(16.45–75.06) |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 221 | 46 | 20.8 (15.24–27.76) |
A linear trend for occurrence rates was observed with the Cochran–Armitage trend test (Z = 3.6907, P = 0.0002).
CI indicates confidence interval.
Univariate analysis of variables associated with stroke occurrence by 90 days.
| Stroke occurrence by 90 d | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | No (n = 175) | Yes (n = 46) | P Value | |
|
| 87 (39.4) | 64 (36.6) | 23 (50.0) | 0.115 |
|
| 103 (46.6) | 79 (45.1) | 24 (52.2) | 0.359 |
|
| 53 (24.0) | 42 (24.0) | 11 (23.9) | 0.916 |
|
| 20 (9.0) | 18 (10.3) | 2 (4.3) | 0.219 |
|
| 6 (2.7) | 5 (2.9) | 1 (2.2) | 0.843 |
|
| 134 (60.0) | 103 (58.9) | 31 (67.4) | 0.303 |
|
| 30 (13.6) | 24 (13.7) | 6 (13.0) | 0.877 |
|
| 33 (14.9) | 26 (14.9) | 7 (15.2) | 0.980 |
|
| 107 (48.4) | 81 (46.3) | 26 (56.5) | 0.195 |
|
| 77 (34.8) | 48 (27.4) | 29 (63.0) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
|
| 29 (13.1) | 23 (13.4) | 6 (13.3) | 0.975 |
|
| 113 (51.1) | 83 (47.7) | 30 (68.2) | 0.020 |
|
| 166 (75.1) | 133 (76.0) | 33 (71.7) | 0.569 |
|
| 67 (30.3) | 52 (29.7) | 15(32.6) | 0.643 |
|
| ||||
|
| 195 (88.2) | 150 (85.7) | 45 (97.8) | 0.061 |
|
| 3 (1.4) | 3 (1.7) | 0 (0) | — |
|
| 96 (43.4) | 71 (40.6) | 25 (54.3) | 0.109 |
|
| 168 (76.0) | 125 (71.4) | 43 (93.5) | 0.006 |
|
| 29 (13.1) | 22 (12.6) | 7 (15.2) | 0.615 |
Univariate analysis showed risk factors associated with stroke occurrence (P<0.1)
Multivariate cox regression analysis for stroke occurrence by 90 days.
| Recurrence | No Recurrence | HR (95%CI) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 48 (27.4) | 29 (63.0) | 3.406(1.854–6.257) | <0.001 |
|
| 43 (93.5) | 125 (71.4) | 7.131(1.725–29.476) | 0.007 |
Multivariate cox regression analysis showed the independent risk factors (P<0.05).
HR indicates hazard ratio.