Literature DB >> 26394343

The Effects of Subcrestal Implant Placement on Crestal Bone Levels and Bone-to-Abutment Contact: A Microcomputed Tomographic and Histologic Study in Dogs.

Michael Fetner, Alan Fetner, Theofilos Koutouzis, Emanuele Clozza, Nick Tovar, Alvin Sarendranath, Paulo G Coelho, Kathleen Neiva, Malvin N Janal, Rodrigo Neiva.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Implant design and the implant-abutment interface have been regarded as key influences on crestal bone maintenance over time. The aim of the present study was to determine crestal bone changes around implants placed at different depths in a dog model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six two-piece dental implants with a medialized implant-abutment interface and Morse taper connection (Ankylos, Dentsply) were placed in edentulous areas bilaterally in six mongrel dogs. On each side of the mandible, three implants were placed randomly at the bone crest, 1.5 mm subcrestally, or 3.0 mm subcrestally. After 3 months, the final abutments were torqued into place. At 6 months, the animals were sacrificed and samples taken for microcomputed tomographic (micro-CT) and histologic evaluations.
RESULTS: Micro-CT analysis revealed similar crestal or marginal bone loss among groups. Both subcrestal implant groups lost significantly less crestal and marginal bone than the equicrestal implants. Bone loss was greatest on the buccal of the implants, regardless of implant placement depth. Histologically, implants placed subcrestally were found to have bone in contact with the final abutment and on the implant platform.
CONCLUSION: Implants with a centralized implant-abutment interface and Morse taper connection can be placed subcrestally without significant loss of crestal or marginal bone. Subcrestal placement of this implant system appears to be advantageous in maintaining bone height coronal to the implant platform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26394343     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  3 in total

1.  Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Naser Sargolzaie; Hosein Hoseini Zarch; Hamidreza Arab; Tahereh Koohestani; Mahdiye Fasihi Ramandi
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Matteo Albertini; Federico Herrero-Climent; Carmen María Díaz-Castro; Jose Nart; Ana Fernández-Palacín; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Aesthetic Surgical Approach for Bone Dehiscence Treatment by Means of Single Implant and Interdental Tissue Regeneration: A Case Report with Five Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Giorgio Lombardo; Jacopo Pighi; Giovanni Corrocher; Anna Mascellaro; Jeffrey Lehrberg; Mauro Marincola; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-03-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.