| Literature DB >> 26394096 |
Ervan Rutishauser1, Bruno Hérault2, Christopher Baraloto3, Lilian Blanc4, Laurent Descroix5, Eleneide Doff Sotta6, Joice Ferreira7, Milton Kanashiro7, Lucas Mazzei7, Marcus V N d'Oliveira8, Luis C de Oliveira8, Marielos Peña-Claros9, Francis E Putz10, Ademir R Ruschel7, Ken Rodney11, Anand Roopsind12, Alexander Shenkin13, Katia E da Silva14, Cintia R de Souza14, Marisol Toledo15, Edson Vidal16, Thales A P West10, Verginia Wortel17, Plinio Sist4.
Abstract
While around 20% of the Amazonian forest has been cleared for pastures and agriculture, one fourth of the remaining forest is dedicated to wood production. Most of these production forests have been or will be selectively harvested for commercial timber, but recent studies show that even soon after logging, harvested stands retain much of their tree-biomass carbon and biodiversity. Comparing species richness of various animal taxa among logged and unlogged forests across the tropics, Burivalova et al. found that despite some variability among taxa, biodiversity loss was generally explained by logging intensity (the number of trees extracted). Here, we use a network of 79 permanent sample plots (376 ha total) located at 10 sites across the Amazon Basin to assess the main drivers of time-to-recovery of post-logging tree carbon (Table S1). Recovery time is of direct relevance to policies governing management practices (i.e., allowable volumes cut and cutting cycle lengths), and indirectly to forest-based climate change mitigation interventions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26394096 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Biol ISSN: 0960-9822 Impact factor: 10.834