Literature DB >> 26394027

Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Using the Modified Prolonged Prefiring Compression Technique Reduces Pancreatic Fistula.

Arun V Ariyarathenam1, David Bunting1, Somaiah Aroori1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a common postoperative complication following distal pancreatectomy. The prolonged prefiring compression (PFC) technique to reduce PF has been described by Nakamura and colleagues in Japan. The present study assessed if this technique can be applied to the United Kingdom patient population in a tertiary referral center and replicate the low incidence of PF after the laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent Lap-DP using the modified PFC technique by the senior author between June 2011 and July 2014. The modified PFC technique involved compression of the pancreatic parenchyma with an endo-stapler for a 3-minute period prior to firing and further 1-minute compression after firing prior to removal of the stapler, which is a small variant to the original technique of maintaining a 2-minute compression post firing.
RESULTS: Twenty patients (15 females; median age, 66 [range, 25-77] years) underwent Lap-DP using the PFC technique during the study period. Six patients had splenic-preserving Lap-DP. Median operating time was 240 minutes (range, 150-420 minutes) with a median length of hospital stay of 6 days (range, 3-22 days). Six patients (30%) developed Type A (biochemically noted as high drain fluid amylase) PF, and none of the patients had Type B/C PF. In the splenic preservation group, 1 patient had complete splenic infarction requiring laparoscopic splenectomy on Day 3, and 1 patient had partial infarction requiring prolonged hospital stay for pain relief. One patient required prolonged respiratory support due to severe preexisting lung disease. Overall mortality was zero.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that the PFC technique is safe, feasible, and effective in reducing clinically significant PF post-Lap-DP in the United Kingdom patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26394027     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  7 in total

1.  Technique and audited outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combining the clockwise approach, progressive stepwise compression technique, and staple line reinforcement.

Authors:  Horacio J Asbun; Jony Van Hilst; Levan Tsamalaidze; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Dominic Sanford; Lucio Pereira; Marc G Besselink; John A Stauffer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Attempts to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Yasuhisa Mori; Kohei Nakata; Takao Ohtsuka; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  [Closure of pancreas stump after distal and segmental resection : Suture, stapler, coverage or anastomosis?]

Authors:  C W Michalski; P Tramelli; M W Büchler; T Hackert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: better than open?

Authors:  Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranues; Igor Khatkov; Luigi Boni
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-01

5.  Optimal stapler cartridge selection according to the thickness of the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Hongbeom Kim; Jin-Young Jang; Donghee Son; Seungyeoun Lee; Youngmin Han; Yong Chan Shin; Jae Ri Kim; Wooil Kwon; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Pancreatic Fistula and Biochemical Leak after Splenectomy: Incidence and Risk Factors-A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.

Authors:  T Vowinkel; F Becker; A S Mehdorn; A K Schwieters; W A Mardin; N Senninger; B Strücker; A Pascher
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Prophylactic abdominal drainage or no drainage after distal pancreatectomy (PANDORINA): a binational multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  F L Vissers; A Balduzzi; E A van Bodegraven; C Bassi; C van Eijck; M G Besselink; J van Hilst; S Festen; M Abu Hilal; H J Asbun; J S D Mieog; B Groot Koerkamp; O R Busch; F Daams; M Luyer; M De Pastena; G Malleo; G Marchegiani; J Klaase; I Q Molenaar; R Salvia; H C van Santvoort; M Stommel; D Lips; M Coolsen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.728

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.