Literature DB >> 26393869

Psychological Reasoning in Infancy.

Renée Baillargeon1, Rose M Scott2, Lin Bian1.   

Abstract

Adults routinely make sense of others' actions by inferring the mental states that underlie these actions. Over the past two decades, developmental researchers have made significant advances in understanding the origins of this ability in infancy. This evidence indicates that when infants observe an agent act in a simple scene, they infer the agent's mental states and then use these mental states, together with a principle of rationality (and its corollaries of efficiency and consistency), to predict and interpret the agent's subsequent actions and to guide their own actions toward the agent. In this review, we first describe the initial demonstrations of infants' sensitivity to the efficiency and consistency principles. We then examine how infants identify novel entities as agents. Next, we summarize what is known about infants' ability to reason about agents' motivational, epistemic, and counterfactual states. Finally, we consider alternative interpretations of these findings and discuss the current controversy about the relation between implicit and explicit psychological reasoning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agency; false beliefs; implicit reasoning; infant cognition; mental states; psychological reasoning; rationality; theory of mind

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26393869     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  18 in total

1.  Infants possess an abstract expectation of ingroup support.

Authors:  Kyong-Sun Jin; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Human Actions Support Infant Memory.

Authors:  Lauren H Howard; Amanda L Woodward
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2019-10-17

3.  Probing the depth of infants' theory of mind: disunity in performance across paradigms.

Authors:  Diane Poulin-Dubois; Jessica Yott
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-09-27

4.  Two-and-a-half-year-olds succeed at a traditional false-belief task with reduced processing demands.

Authors:  Peipei Setoh; Rose M Scott; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Toward an Integration of Deep Learning and Neuroscience.

Authors:  Adam H Marblestone; Greg Wayne; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Infants understand deceptive intentions to implant false beliefs about identity: New evidence for early mentalistic reasoning.

Authors:  Rose M Scott; Joshua C Richman; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Toddlers draw broad negative inferences from wrongdoers' moral violations.

Authors:  Fransisca Ting; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Infants' Understanding of Distributive Fairness as a Test Case for Identifying the Extents and Limits of Infants' Sociomoral Cognition and Behavior.

Authors:  Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2018-02-19

9.  Representational coexistence in the God concept: Core knowledge intuitions of God as a person are not revised by Christian theology despite lifelong experience.

Authors:  Michael Barlev; Spencer Mermelstein; Tamsin C German
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

10.  Infants' representations of same and different in match- and non-match-to-sample.

Authors:  Jean-Rémy Hochmann; Shilpa Mody; Susan Carey
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.