Literature DB >> 26393462

Radiation Treatment Affects Chromosome Testing in Uveal Melanoma.

Mehmet Dogrusöz1, Wilma G M Kroes2, Sjoerd G van Duinen3, Carien L Creutzberg4, Mieke Versluis1, Jaco C Bleeker1, Marina Marinkovic1, Gregorius P M Luyten1, Martine J Jager1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiation treatment induces chromosomal aberrations in uveal melanoma (UM) and to evaluate which tumor features determine success of karyotyping and FISH.
METHODS: Material from 327 UM-containing enucleated eyes was submitted for karyotyping, while FISH for chromosome 3 was performed in 248 samples. Thirty-six UMs had previously undergone irradiation. Karyotypes were analyzed, and the success rate of karyotyping/FISH was evaluated and compared with clinicopathologic tumor characteristics and prior irradiation.
RESULTS: Aberrations were observed in all chromosomes, with chromosomes 1, 3, 6, 8, 13, 15, 16, and Y being altered in at least 15% of the tumors. Aberrations were more common and more complex in previously irradiated tumors (significant for chromosomes 5 [P = 0.004] and 13 [P = 0.04]). Karyotyping and FISH failed significantly more often in irradiated tumors (both P < 0.001). In nonirradiated cases, successful karyotyping was related to a large tumor prominence (P = 0.004) and a high mitotic count (P = 0.007). The success of FISH in these tumors was not associated with any of the studied parameters. In irradiated tumors, karyotyping succeeded more frequently in cases with a high mitotic count (P = 0.03), whereas FISH was more often successful in tumors with a high mitotic count (P = 0.001), a large diameter (P = 0.009) and large prominence (P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Karyotyping and FISH are more often successful in UMs with features characteristic of high tumor aggressiveness, whereas prior irradiation leads to multiple chromosome aberrations and to unsuccessful tests. It will be interesting to determine whether other techniques can provide reliable information on the chromosome status of previously irradiated UMs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26393462     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-17092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  7 in total

Review 1.  Uveal Melanoma Cell Lines: Where do they come from? (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Authors:  Martine J Jager; J Antonio Bermudez Magner; Bruce R Ksander; Sander R Dubovy
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  Choroidal biopsies; a review and optimised approach.

Authors:  R N Hussain; B Damato; H Heimann
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.456

3.  Elevated VEGF-A & PLGF concentration in aqueous humor of patients with uveal melanoma following Iodine-125 plaque radiotherapy.

Authors:  Meng-Xi Chen; Yue-Ming Liu; Yang Li; Xuan Yang; Wen-Bin Wei
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Five Decades of Enucleations for Uveal Melanoma in One Center: More Tumors with High Risk Factors, No Improvement in Survival over Time.

Authors:  Christine D M Roelofsen; Annemijn P A Wierenga; Sjoerd van Duinen; Robert M Verdijk; Jaco Bleeker; Marina Marinkovic; Gregorius P M Luyten; Martine J Jager
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2020-12-15

5.  Genetic evolution of uveal melanoma guides the development of an inflammatory microenvironment.

Authors:  Gülçin Gezgin; Mehmet Dogrusöz; T Huibertus van Essen; Wilhelmina G M Kroes; Gregorius P M Luyten; Pieter A van der Velden; Vonn Walter; Robert M Verdijk; Thorbald van Hall; Sjoerd H van der Burg; Martine J Jager
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 6.  Brachytherapy for patients with uveal melanoma: historical perspectives and future treatment directions.

Authors:  Beatrice Y Brewington; Yusra F Shao; Fredrick H Davidorf; Colleen M Cebulla
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-17

7.  Clinical Performance and Management Outcomes with the DecisionDx-UM Gene Expression Profile Test in a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kristen Meldi Plasseraud; Robert W Cook; Tony Tsai; Yevgeniy Shildkrot; Brooke Middlebrook; Derek Maetzold; Jeff Wilkinson; John Stone; Clare Johnson; Kristen Oelschlager; Thomas M Aaberg
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.375

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.