| Literature DB >> 26392773 |
Weifeng Wang1, Feng Yuan2, Guoping Wang2, Zhiren Lin2, Yanling Pan2, Longhua Chen3.
Abstract
AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the application of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on computed tomography (CT) simulations in different respiratory phases.Entities:
Keywords: CT-based simulation in different respiratory phases; non-small cell lung cancer; survival; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
Year: 2015 PMID: 26392773 PMCID: PMC4573072 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S86642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Baseline characteristics of the 64 patients
| Characteristics | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 41 (64.1) |
| Female | 23 (35.9) |
| Diagnosis | |
| Cytology | 9 (14.1) |
| Histology | 51 (79.6) |
| Unknown | 4 (6.3) |
| Histologic subtype | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 32 (50.0) |
| Squamous carcinoma | 25 (39.0) |
| Mixed carcinoma | 3 (4.7) |
| Unknown | 4 (6.3) |
| Karnofsky performance status | |
| 100 | 2 (3.1) |
| 90 | 6 (9.4) |
| 80 | 28 (43.8) |
| 70 | 21 (32.8) |
| ≤60 | 7 (10.9) |
| Disease stage at diagnosis | |
| Ib | 3 (4.7) |
| IIa | 4 (6.3) |
| IIb | 7 (10.9) |
| IIIa | 25 (39.1) |
| IIIb | 21 (32.8) |
| IV | 4 (6.3) |
| Age (years) | |
| Median | 76 |
| Range | 70–84 |
Figure 1Comparison of normal lung volume receiving radiation between the classic and the new 3D-CRT approaches.
Abbreviation: 3D-CRT, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.
Evaluation of short-term efficacy and toxicity of the radiotherapy
| Criteria | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Complete response | 17/64 (26.6) |
| Partial response | 34/64 (53.1) |
| Overall response rate | 51/64 (79.7) |
| Chest pain completely disappeared | 7/8 (87.5) |
| Pneumonitis | 5/64 (7.8) |
| Esophagitis | 6/51 (11.8) |
Figure 2Overall survival curves.
Notes: (A) All patients; results according to (B) age group, (C) performance status, (D) T stage, and (E) N stage.
Cox regression analysis
| OR | 95% CI
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||
| Age | 0.986 | 0.695 | 2.673 |
| T stage | 0.973 | 0.126 | 1.287 |
| N stage | 1.212 | 1.150 | 2.074 |
| KPS | 1.259 | 1.242 | 1.667 |
Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; OR, odds ratio.