Literature DB >> 26392199

Comparison of invasive micropapillary and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Hong-liang Chen1, Ang Ding2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) are both aggressive subtypes, but little information is available on their comparison. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 95 IMPC and 200 TNBC-IDC (invasive ductal carcinoma) was conducted to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and survivals.
RESULTS: For IMPC, pN was the independent prognostic factor of local-regional recurrence free survival (LRRFS) (P = 0.045) and metastasis free survival (MFS) (P = 0.048), but not of overall survival (OS) (P = 0.165). For TNBC, pT and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were both independent prognostic factors of MFS (pT: P = 0.006, LVI: P = 0.010) and OS (pT: P = 0.006, LVI: P = 0.001), but not for LRRFS (pT: P = 0.060, LVI: P = 0.503). IMPC exhibited more aggressive features than TNBC, including larger tumor size, a greater proportion of nodal involvement, and an increased incidence of LVI. After a median follow-up duration of 61 months, 5y-LRRFS rate was lower in IMPC than in TNBC, in entire cohort (71.4 ± 4.8% vs. 89.8 ± 2.2%, P < 0.001) and in node positive cases (64.2 ± 5.9% vs. 81.7 ± 4.4%, P = 0.048). A tendency of lower 5y-MFS rate was observed in TNBC compared with in IMPC, in node positive cases (63.8 ± 5.5% vs. 74.8 ± 5.5%, P = 0.053) and in node negative cases (80.1 ± 3.6% vs. 96.2 ± 3.8%, P = 0.052), but it did not reach significance. 5y-OS was similar between IMPC and TNBC (81.9 ± 4.7% vs. 79.8 ± 3.1%, P = 0.475).
CONCLUSIONS: IMPC is featured with high rate of lymph node involvement which is strongly associated with high rate of LRR. TNBC is featured with high rate of early distant metastasis without increase of nodal metastases. The survival is still relatively poor even in node negative cases.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinicopathologic characteristic; Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of breast; Prognosis; Triple negative breast cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26392199     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  11 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Classification and Future Therapeutic Challenges of Triple-negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nikolaos Garmpis; Christos Damaskos; Anna Garmpi; Konstantinos Nikolettos; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Evangelos Diamantis; Paraskevi Farmaki; Alexandros Patsouras; Errika Voutyritsa; Athanasios Syllaios; Constantinos G Zografos; Efstathios A Antoniou; Nikos Nikolettos; Alkiviadis Kostakis; Konstantinos Kontzoglou; Dimitrios Schizas; Afroditi Nonni
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Impact of central obesity on prognostic outcome of triple negative breast cancer in Chinese women.

Authors:  Hong-Liang Chen; Ang Ding; Mao-Li Wang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-05-11

3.  The prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma in the breast: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Wu; Ning Zhang; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Preoperative [18]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in early stage breast cancer: Rates of distant metastases.

Authors:  Vincent Vinh-Hung; Hendrik Everaert; Karim Farid; Navid Djassemi; Jacqueline Baudin-Veronique; Stefanos Bougas; Yuriy Michailovich; Clarisse Joachim-Contaret; Elsa Cécilia-Joseph; Claire Verschraegen; Nam P Nguyen
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-28

5.  Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast had no difference in prognosis compared with invasive ductal carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Shuang Hao; Yuan-Yuan Zhao; Jin-Juan Peng; Fei Ren; Wen-Tao Yang; Ke-Da Yu; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Prognosis of lymphotropic invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma analyzed by using data from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Gary D Lewis; Yan Xing; Waqar Haque; Tejal Patel; Mary Schwartz; Albert Chen; Andrew Farach; Sandra S Hatch; E Brian Butler; Jenny Chang; Bin S Teh
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2019-10-21

Review 7.  Micropapillary Breast Carcinoma: From Molecular Pathogenesis to Prognosis.

Authors:  Georgios-Ioannis Verras; Levan Tchabashvili; Francesk Mulita; Ioanna Maria Grypari; Sofia Sourouni; Evangelia Panagodimou; Maria-Ioanna Argentou
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2022-03-12

8.  Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast has a better long-term survival than invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in spite of its aggressive clinical presentations: a comparison based on large population database and case-control analysis.

Authors:  Hongliang Chen; Kejin Wu; Maoli Wang; Fuwen Wang; Mingdi Zhang; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Postoperative radiotherapy for invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: an analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Authors:  San-Gang Wu; Wen-Wen Zhang; Jia-Yuan Sun; Feng-Yan Li; Yong-Xiong Chen; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma in breast: A meta-analysis of PSM studies.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Ping Yu; Na Li; Anli Yang; Xinhua Xie; Hailin Tang; Peng Liu
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.