| Literature DB >> 26391981 |
Yan Xu1, Long Huang2, Dehua Ji3, Changsheng Chen4, Hongkun Zheng5, Chaotian Xie6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pyropia haitanensis is one of the most economically important mariculture crops in China. A high-density genetic map has not been published yet and quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping has not been undertaken for P. haitanensis because of a lack of sufficient molecular markers. Specific length amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) was developed recently for large-scale, high resolution de novo marker discovery and genotyping. In this study, SLAF-seq was used to obtain mass length polymorphic markers to construct a high-density genetic map for P. haitanensis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26391981 PMCID: PMC4578236 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-015-0604-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Coverage and number of markers for each double haploid (DH) individual and their parents. The x-axes in (a and b) indicate the plant accession, including the female parent and the male parent, followed by each of the DH individuals; the y-axes indicate coverage in (a) and number of markers in (b)
SLAF markers mining results
| Type | Polymorphic SLAF | Non-Polymorphic SLAF | Repetitive SLAF | Total SLAF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 8553 | 180,394 | 35 | 188,982 |
| Percentage | 4.53 % | 95.46 % | 0.02 % | 100 % |
Number of polymorphic SLAF markers for the eight segregation patterns
| Type | Polymorphic SLAF |
|---|---|
| No_P_M | 6181 |
| ab × cd | 8 |
| ef × eg | 6 |
| hk × hk | 273 |
| lm × ll | 219 |
| nn × np | 124 |
| aa × bb | 1748 |
| aa × cc | 19 |
| cc × ab | 10 |
Fig. 2Schematic diagram of the production of length polymorphic (LP) markers
Fig. 3High-density linkage map for P. haitanensis and QTL locations in the map for six economically important traits. FL, frond length; FW, frond width; FT, frond thickness; W, fresh weight; LGR, frond length growth rate; WGR, fresh weight growth rate
Summary of the five genetic linkages groups for P. haitanensis
| Linkage group ID | Total marker | Total bin | Total distance (cM) | Average distance (cM) | Max gap (cM) | Gaps < 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG1 | 1,154 | 198 | 208.78 | 1.05 | 1.94 | 100 % |
| LG2 | 1,013 | 142 | 155.37 | 1.09 | 1.94 | 100 % |
| LG3 | 1,025 | 149 | 167.19 | 1.12 | 3.89 | 99.32 |
| LG4 | 683 | 149 | 202.98 | 1.36 | 4.87 | 95.95 |
| LG5 | 675 | 102 | 140.02 | 1.37 | 7.83 | 94.06 |
| Total | 4,550 | 740 | 874.33 | 1.18 | 7.83 | 97.87 |
“Gap < 2” indicates the percentages of gaps in which the distance between adjacent bin markers was less than 2 cM
Performance of characters in the DH population and its parents
| Character | Male parent | Female parent | DH population | Coefficient of variation | Asymptotic significance of one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL (cm) | 23.19 ± 3.70** | 34.08 ± 3.90** | 25.37 ± 11.55 | 45.57 % | 0.159 |
| FW (mm) | 6.82 ± 1.12** | 2.20 ± 0.25** | 5.86 ± 2.00 | 34.03 % | 0.277 |
| W (mg) | 78.43 ± 16.66** | 39.99 ± 7.22** | 75.40 ± 43.24 | 57.35 % | 0.398 |
| FT (μm) | 33.38 ± 1.96** | 26.25 ± 1.77** | 32.78 ± 6.89 | 20.43 % | 0.758 |
| LGR (%) | 17.06 ± 1.06** | 20.17 ± 0.94** | 16.64 ± 4.84 | 29.07 % | 0.944 |
| WGR (%) | 34.86 ± 2.74** | 24.20 ± 2.00** | 30.31 ± 7.02 | 23.16 % | 0.057 |
Data are the mean ± SD (n = 30); t tests were used to analyze differences between parents; **highly significant (P ≤ 0.01)
Detail of QTLs related to economic traits
| Trait | QTL | LODa | Linkage group ID | IC (cM)b | Marker numberc | PVEd | ADDe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | qFL | 4.54 | 1 | 158.29–170.94 | 11 | 16.61 % | 126.87 |
| FW | qFW-1 | 2.64 | 1 | 177.71–178.68 | 1 | 9.67 % | 23.84 |
| qFW-2 | 3.89 | 2 | 69.93–73.81 | 4 | 12.2 % | 88.40 | |
| qFW-3 | 4.21 | 2 | 130.16–133.05 | 3 | 16.7 % | 74.85 | |
| FT | qFT-1 | 2.92 | 1 | 31.08–34 | 2 | 12.11 % | 51.38 |
| qFT-2 | 4.04 | 1 | 35.94–45.65 | 9 | 13.84 % | 163.09 | |
| qFT-3 | 2.67 | 1 | 48.56–49.53 | 1 | 11.59 % | 24.53 | |
| W | qW-1 | 3.39 | 1 | 166.06–168.97 | 3 | 11.61 % | 54.23 |
| qW-2 | 2.96 | 2 | 90.35–92.26 | 2 | 14.52 % | 38.35 | |
| LGR | qLGR-1 | 2.93 | 1 | 79.64–80.61 | 1 | 10.79 % | 25.28 |
| qLGR-2 | 3.75 | 1 | 82.55–94.2 | 12 | 12.51 % | 193.06 | |
| qLGR-3 | 3.61 | 1 | 166.06–168 | 2 | 12.14 % | 43.44 | |
| qLGR-4 | 2.65 | 2 | 91.29–92.26 | 1 | 9.59 % | 23.82 | |
| WGR | qWGR-1 | 3.51 | 1 | 56.33–63.13 | 5 | 12.8 % | 117.14 |
| qWGR-2 | 4.38 | 2 | 31.08–47.59 | 14 | 13.35 % | 275.31 |
aLOD indicates the logarithm of odds score
bIC indicates the interval of confidence in centimorgans
cMarker number indicates the number of bin markers in the confidence interval
dPVE indicates the phenotypic variance explained by individual QTL
eADD indicates the additive effect value