Literature DB >> 26391774

Visualization of the electric field evoked by transcranial electric stimulation during a craniotomy using the finite element method.

Ryosuke Tomio1, Takenori Akiyama2, Tomo Horikoshi2, Takayuki Ohira2, Kazunari Yoshida2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcranial MEP (tMEP) monitoring is more readily performed than cortical MEP (cMEP), however, tMEP is considered as less accurate than cMEP. The craniotomy procedure and changes in CSF levels must affect current spread. These changes can impair the accuracy. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of skull deformation and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) decrease on tMEP monitoring during frontotemporal craniotomy.
METHODS: We used the finite element method to visualize the electric field in the brain, which was generated by transcranial electric stimulation, using realistic 3-dimensional head models developed from T1-weighted images. Surfaces of 5 layers of the head were separated as accurately as possible. We created 3 brain types and 5 craniotomy models.
RESULTS: The electric field in the brain radiates out from the cortex just below the electrodes. When the CSF layer is thick, a decrease in CSF volume and depression of CSF surface level during the craniotomy has a major impact on the electric field. When the CSF layer is thin and the distance between the skull and brain is short, the craniotomy has a larger effect on the electric field than the CSF decrease. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHOD: So far no report in the literature the electric field during intraoperative tMEP using a 3-dimensional realistic head model.
CONCLUSION: Our main finding was that the intensity of the electric field in the brain is most affected by changes in the thickness and volume of the CSF layer.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element method; Frontotemporal craniotomy; Neurosurgery; Transcranial electric stimulation; Transcranial motor evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26391774     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of effectiveness between cork-screw and peg-screw electrodes for transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring using the finite element method.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tomio; Takenori Akiyama; Takayuki Ohira; Kazunari Yoshida
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-11-11

2.  Impact of brain atrophy on tDCS and HD-tDCS current flow: a modeling study in three variants of primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Gozde Unal; Bronte Ficek; Kimberly Webster; Syed Shahabuddin; Dennis Truong; Benjamin Hampstead; Marom Bikson; Kyrana Tsapkini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Transcranial versus direct electrical stimulation for intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring: Prognostic value comparison in asleep brain tumor surgery.

Authors:  Luca Viganò; Vincenzo Callipo; Marta Lamperti; Marco Rossi; Marco Conti Nibali; Tommaso Sciortino; Lorenzo Gay; Guglielmo Puglisi; Antonella Leonetti; Gabriella Cerri; Lorenzo Bello
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Effects of electrodes length and insulation for transcranial electric stimulation.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tomio
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-06-19

5.  Standard Non-Personalized Electric Field Modeling of Twenty Typical tDCS Electrode Configurations via the Computational Finite Element Method: Contributions and Limitations of Two Different Approaches.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo; Michael A Nitsche; Carolina Gutiérrez Lérida; Ángeles Salas Sánchez; Raquel Martín Riquel; Rafael Tomás Andújar Barroso; José Ramón Alameda Bailén; Jesús Carlos García Palomeque; Guadalupe Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.