Meghan E Vidt1, Anthony C Santago2, Christopher J Tuohy3, Gary G Poehling3, Michael T Freehill3, Robert A Kraft4, Anthony P Marsh4, Eric J Hegedus5, Michael E Miller6, Katherine R Saul7. 1. Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 2. Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A.; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A. 4. Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A.; Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A. 5. Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, U.S.A. 6. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A. 7. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A.. Electronic address: ksaul@ncsu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To (1) determine whether standard clinical muscle fatty infiltration and atrophy assessment techniques using a single image slice for patients with a rotator cuff tear (RCT) are correlated with 3-dimensional measures in older individuals (60+ years) and (2) to determine whether age-associated changes to muscle morphology and strength are compounded by an RCT. METHODS: Twenty older individuals were studied: 10 with an RCT of the supraspinatus (5 men and 5 women) and 10 matched controls. Clinical imaging assessments (Goutallier and Fuchs scores and cross-sectional area ratio) were performed for participants with RCTs. Three-dimensional measurements of rotator cuff muscle and fat tissues were obtained for all participants using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Isometric joint moment was measured at the shoulder. RESULTS: There were no significant associations between single-image assessments and 3-dimensional measurements of fatty infiltration for the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. Compared with controls, participants with RCTs had significantly increased percentages of fatty infiltration for each rotator cuff muscle (all P ≤ .023); reduced whole muscle volume for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis muscles (all P ≤ .038); and reduced fat-free muscle volume for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis muscles (all P ≤ .027). Only the teres minor (P = .017) fatty infiltration volume was significantly greater for participants with RCTs. Adduction, flexion, and external rotation strength (all P ≤ .021) were significantly reduced for participants with RCTs, and muscle volume was a significant predictor of strength for all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical scores using a single image slice do not represent 3-dimensional muscle measurements. Efficient methods are needed to more effectively capture 3-dimensional information for clinical applications. Participants with RCTs had increased fatty infiltration percentages that were likely driven by muscle atrophy rather than increased fat volume. The significant association of muscle volume with strength production suggests that treatments to preserve muscle volume should be pursued for older patients with RCTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study, with development of diagnostic criteria on the basis of consecutive patients with universally applied reference gold standard.
PURPOSE: To (1) determine whether standard clinical muscle fatty infiltration and atrophy assessment techniques using a single image slice for patients with a rotator cuff tear (RCT) are correlated with 3-dimensional measures in older individuals (60+ years) and (2) to determine whether age-associated changes to muscle morphology and strength are compounded by an RCT. METHODS: Twenty older individuals were studied: 10 with an RCT of the supraspinatus (5 men and 5 women) and 10 matched controls. Clinical imaging assessments (Goutallier and Fuchs scores and cross-sectional area ratio) were performed for participants with RCTs. Three-dimensional measurements of rotator cuff muscle and fat tissues were obtained for all participants using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Isometric joint moment was measured at the shoulder. RESULTS: There were no significant associations between single-image assessments and 3-dimensional measurements of fatty infiltration for the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. Compared with controls, participants with RCTs had significantly increased percentages of fatty infiltration for each rotator cuff muscle (all P ≤ .023); reduced whole muscle volume for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis muscles (all P ≤ .038); and reduced fat-free muscle volume for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis muscles (all P ≤ .027). Only the teres minor (P = .017) fatty infiltration volume was significantly greater for participants with RCTs. Adduction, flexion, and external rotation strength (all P ≤ .021) were significantly reduced for participants with RCTs, and muscle volume was a significant predictor of strength for all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical scores using a single image slice do not represent 3-dimensional muscle measurements. Efficient methods are needed to more effectively capture 3-dimensional information for clinical applications. Participants with RCTs had increased fatty infiltration percentages that were likely driven by muscle atrophy rather than increased fat volume. The significant association of muscle volume with strength production suggests that treatments to preserve muscle volume should be pursued for older patients with RCTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study, with development of diagnostic criteria on the basis of consecutive patients with universally applied reference gold standard.
Authors: Garry E Gold; Eric Han; Jeff Stainsby; Graham Wright; Jean Brittain; Christopher Beaulieu Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Michael Khazzam; John E Kuhn; Ed Mulligan; Joseph A Abboud; Keith M Baumgarten; Robert H Brophy; Grant L Jones; Bruce Miller; Matthew Smith; Rick W Wright Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Nikhil N Verma; Sanjeev Bhatia; Champ L Baker; Brian J Cole; Nicole Boniquit; Gregory P Nicholson; Anthony A Romeo Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2010-08-21 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Edwin E Spencer; Warren R Dunn; Rick W Wright; Brian R Wolf; Kurt P Spindler; Eric McCarty; C Benjamin Ma; Grant Jones; Marc Safran; G Brian Holloway; John E Kuhn Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-10-11 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Meghan E Vidt; Melissa Daly; Michael E Miller; Cralen C Davis; Anthony P Marsh; Katherine R Saul Journal: J Biomech Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Jonathan P Gumucio; Michael A Korn; Anjali L Saripalli; Michael D Flood; Anthony C Phan; Stuart M Roche; Evan B Lynch; Dennis R Claflin; Asheesh Bedi; Christopher L Mendias Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Ged G Wieschhoff; Jacob C Mandell; Gregory J Czuczman; Violeta Nikac; Nehal Shah; Stacy E Smith Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Paul S Micevych; Ankur Garg; Lucas T Buchler; Guido Marra; Matthew D Saltzman; Todd B Parrish; Amee L Seitz Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Meghan E Vidt; Anthony C Santago; Anthony P Marsh; Eric J Hegedus; Christopher J Tuohy; Gary G Poehling; Michael T Freehill; Michael E Miller; Katherine R Saul Journal: J Biomech Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Jennifer A Nichols; Kenneth Bo Foreman; Alexej Barg; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Meghan E Vidt; Anthony C Santago; Anthony P Marsh; Eric J Hegedus; Christopher J Tuohy; Gary G Poehling; Michael T Freehill; Michael E Miller; Katherine R Saul Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 2.063