| Literature DB >> 26391586 |
Shiva Bhandari1,2, Jamuna Tamrakar Sayami3,4, Ricky Raj K C5, Megha Raj Banjara6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In resource-limited nations like Nepal, congenital defects, including neural tube defects (NTDs), have great public health impact. NTDs and a few other congenital defects can be prevented by micronutrient supplementation. Without proper research regarding such defects, it is difficult to assess the damage made to health and productivity. This study aims to investigate different congenital defects among children in Nepal.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26391586 PMCID: PMC4578608 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-015-0453-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Prevalence of neural tube and other birth defects
| Indicators | Prevalence per 10,000 (n/N)* | 95 % CI |
|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of congenital defects | 52.0 (142/27201) | 44.0–61.0 |
| Prevalence of selected NTDs only | 4.0 (11/27201) | 2.0–7.0 |
| Prevalence of other congenital defects except NTDs | 48.0 (131/27201) | 40.0–57.0 |
| Prevalence of congenital defects in Mountain | 16.0 (5/3079) | 7.0–38.0 |
| Prevalence of congenital defects in Hill | 56.0 (85/15156) | 45.0–69.0 |
| Prevalence of congenital defects in Terai | 58.0 (52/8966) | 44.0–76.0 |
Abbreviations: CI confidence interval
* n denotes the children with congenital defects and N denotes total live children
Type of neural tube defects
| Neural tube defects | Hill | 95 % CI | Terai | 95 % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n(prevalence per 10,000) | n(prevalence per 10,000) | |||
| Encephalocele | 4 (3.0) | 1.0–7.0 | 4 (4.0) | 1.0–11.0 |
| Myelomeningocele | 1 (1.0) | 0.0–4.0 | 1 (1.0) | 0.0–6.0 |
| Dermal sinus | 0 (0.0) | – | 1 (1.0) | 0.0–6.0 |
Abbreviations: CI confidence interval
Type of other congenital defects except NTDs
| Birth defects | Mountain n(prevalence per 10,000) | 95 % CI | Hill | 95 % CI | Terai | 95 % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n(prevalence per 10,000) | n(prevalence per 10,000) | |||||
| Hydrocephalus | 0 (0.0) | – | 8 (5.0) | 2.0–10.0 | 8 (9.0) | 5.0–18.0 |
| Scoliosis | 0 (0.0) | – | 1 (1.0) | 0.0–4.0 | 1 (1.0) | 0.0–6.0 |
| Cleft palate | 2 (6.0) | 2.0–23.0 | 7 (5.0) | 2.0–10.0 | 4 (4.0) | 1.0–11.0 |
| Cleft lip | 0 (0.0) | – | 3 (2.0) | 1.0–6.0 | 1 (1.0) | 0.0–6.0 |
| Limb deformities | 0 (0.0) | – | 19 (13.0) | 8.0–20.0 | 13 (14.0) | 8.0–24.0 |
| Genital abnormalities | 0 (0.0) | – | 11 (7.0) | 4.0–13.0 | 15 (17.0) | 10.0–28.0 |
| Any other deformities | 3 (10.0) | 3.0–29.0 | 31 (21.0) | 14.0–28.0 | 4 (4.0) | 1.0–11.0 |
Abbreviations: CI confidence interval
Ecological relations of congenital defects with general health of women
| Ecological regions | Anemia, n (%) | Underweight BMI, n (%) | Hypertension, n (%) | Congenital defects per 10,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mountain | 20 (2.2) | 54 (6.1) | 85 (9.4) | 16.0 |
| Hill | 2165 (26.0) | 1161 (14.8) | 432 (5.2) | 56.0 |
| Terai | 1232 (24.7) | 1235 (26.6) | 431 (8.6) | 58.0 |