Literature DB >> 26391480

Nonparametric estimation of time-to-event distribution based on recall data in observational studies.

Sedigheh Mirzaei Salehabadi1, Debasis Sengupta2.   

Abstract

In a cross-sectional observational study, time-to-event distribution can be estimated from data on current status or from recalled data on the time of occurrence. In either case, one can treat the data as having been interval censored, and use the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator proposed by Turnbull (J R Stat Soc Ser B 38:290-295, 1976). However, the chance of recall may depend on the time span between the occurrence of the event and the time of interview. In such a case, the underlying censoring would be informative, rendering the Turnbull estimator inappropriate. In this article, we provide a nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator of the distribution of interest, by using a model adapted to the special nature of the data at hand. We also provide a computationally simple approximation of this estimator, and establish the consistency of both the original and the approximate versions, under mild conditions. Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the proposed estimators have smaller bias than the Turnbull estimator based on incomplete recall data, smaller variance than the Turnbull estimator based on current status data, and smaller mean squared error than both of them. The method is applied to menarcheal data from a recent Anthropometric study of adolescent and young adult females in Kolkata, India.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Informative censoring; Interval censoring; Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator; Self consistency algorithm; Turnbull estimator

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26391480     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-015-9345-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  10 in total

1.  Age at menarche in Iran.

Authors:  S M T Ayatollahi; E Dowlatabadi; S A R Ayatollahi
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.533

2.  Age at menarche and racial comparisons in US girls.

Authors:  William Cameron Chumlea; Christine M Schubert; Alex F Roche; Howard E Kulin; Peter A Lee; John H Himes; Shumei S Sun
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Peak bone mineral accrual and age at menarche in adolescent girls: a 6-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  H A McKay; D A Bailey; R L Mirwald; K S Davison; R A Faulkner
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Estimation from current-status data in continuous time.

Authors:  N Keiding; K Begtrup; T H Scheike; G Hasibeder
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  A note on the accuracy of recalled age at menarche.

Authors:  A Bergsten-Brucefors
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 1.533

6.  Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of the time-scale.

Authors:  E L Korn; B I Graubard; D Midthune
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Age at menarche based on recall information.

Authors:  M L Hediger; R A Stine
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.533

8.  A new system of dental age assessment.

Authors:  A Demirjian; H Goldstein; J M Tanner
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 0.553

9.  Multilevel models for censored and latent responses.

Authors:  S Rabe-Hesketh; S Yang; A Pickles
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Recent decline in age at breast development: the Copenhagen Puberty Study.

Authors:  Lise Aksglaede; Kaspar Sørensen; Jørgen H Petersen; Niels E Skakkebaek; Anders Juul
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.124

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.