| Literature DB >> 26389958 |
Valérie Bouchez1,2, Nicolas Hegerle3,4, Francesco Strati5,6, Elisabeth Njamkepo7,8, Nicole Guiso9,10.
Abstract
Evolution of Bordetella pertussis is driven by natural and vaccine pressures. Isolates circulating in regions with high vaccination coverage present multiple allelic and antigenic variations as compared to isolates collected before introduction of vaccination. Furthermore, during the last epidemics reported in regions using pertussis acellular vaccines, isolates deficient for vaccine antigens, such as pertactin (PRN), were reported to reach high proportions of circulating isolates. More sporadic filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) or pertussis toxin (PT) deficient isolates were also collected. The whole genome of some recent French isolates, deficient or non-deficient in vaccine antigens, were analyzed. Transcription profiles of the expression of the main virulence factors were also compared. The invasive phenotype in an in vitro human tracheal epithelial (HTE) cell model of infection was evaluated. Our genomic analysis focused on SNPs related to virulence genes known to be more likely to present allelic polymorphism. Transcriptomic data indicated that isolates circulating since the introduction of pertussis vaccines present lower transcription levels of the main virulence genes than the isolates of the pre-vaccine era. Furthermore, isolates not producing FHA present significantly higher expression levels of the entire set of genes tested. Finally, we observed that recent isolates are more invasive in HTE cells when compared to the reference strain, but no multiplication occurs within cells.Entities:
Keywords: Bordetella pertussis; filamentous hemagglutinin; pertactin; vaccine antigen production deficience
Year: 2015 PMID: 26389958 PMCID: PMC4586476 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines3030751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccines (Basel) ISSN: 2076-393X
Characteristics of isolates.
| Name | Year of Collection | Sero typing | Western Blot | Reference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tohama | 1950 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2-1; 3-1 | 2 | + | [ |
| CIP1672 | 1954 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-1; 3-1 | 2 | FHA− | [ |
| FR4624 | 2009 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2-1; 3-2 | 3 | PRN−/FHA− | [ |
| FR4684 | 2010 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2-1; 3-1 | 3 | PRN− | [ |
| FR4929 | 2011 | 21 | 1 | 2 | 2-1; 3-2 | 3 | + | [ |
| FR5133 | 2012 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2-1; 3-2 | 3 | + | [ |
| FR5187 | 2012 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2-1; 3-1 | 3 | PRN− | [ |
qRT-PCR primers.
| Primers Names | Primers Sequences 5' ≥ 3' |
|---|---|
| TGGACGTGCAATACGC | |
| GACCATGCAGTTGGTG | |
| CCTACCAGAGCGAATATCTGGCAC | |
| GATTGGCGCGAGTCTGCT | |
| TCGGAGAGCCACAACT | |
| GTTCCGTATTGAAATTGAAGCC | |
| CGGCGACCTTTACCCTTG | |
| GGCTCCACTGCCCATTG | |
| GGTCAGCTATGCCGCCCT | |
| TTCTCCGTGCGCTTGCCGTA |
Figure 4Normalized invasive properties of tested isolates vs. Tohama. At least three independent assays were done, each in duplicate. Results are normalized vs. Tohama. Statistical analysis were obtained using a t-test and results with p < 0.05 were considered significant (*).
Number of SNP detected after whole genome sequencing.
| SNP details | Tohama (+) | CIP1672 (FHA−) | FR4624 (PRN−/FHA−) | FR4684 (PRN−) | FR4929 (+) | FR5133 (+) | FR5187 (PRN−) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP | 22 | 205 | 252 | 268 | 266 | 279 | 286 |
| Synonymous | 4 | 54 | 67 | 69 | 70 | 75 | 78 |
| Non synonymous | 8 | 82 | 100 | 98 | 105 | 100 | 105 |
| Intragenic | 4 | 28 | 36 | 35 | 34 | 29 | 36 |
| Stop | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Intergenic | 6 | 27 | 30 | 44 | 40 | 44 | 43 |
| Frame shift | 0 | 12 | 15 | 20 | 14 | 27 | 19 |
| Insertion codon | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
SNPs associated to virulence.
| Tohama Reference Genome NC_02929 Position | AN in theRef. | Tohama | CIP1672 (FHA-) | FR4624 (FHA-/PRN-) | FR4684 (PRN-) | FR4929 | FR5133 | FR518 (PRN-) | SNP Observed | Nucleic Acid Change within Codon | AminoAcid Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3988168 | G | G | G | A | G | A | A | A | A | ||||
| 3988244 | G | G | G | G | G | A | G | G | A | ||||
| 3988941 | G | G | A | A | G | A | A | A | A | atG/atA | M/I | ||
| 3989239 | G | G | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | Ggc/Agc | G/S | ||
| 3991376 | C | C | C | T | C | T | T | T | T | tgC/tgT | |||
| 1098920 | * | * | * | * | * | C | C | C | INS (C) | ggt/gCgt | G/A | ||
| 1098922 | G | G | G | G | G | T | T | T | T | Gcg/Tcg | A/S | ||
| 1098926 | T | T | T | T | T | * | * | * | DEL (T) | ||||
| 1098918 | T | T | T | T | T | C | C | C | C | ggT/ggC | |||
| 1176534 | * | G | G | G | * | G | G | G | INS (G) | ||||
| 1176535 | * | G | G | G | * | G | G | G | INS (G) | ||||
| 1176536 | * | G | G | G | * | G | G | G | INS (G) | ||||
| 1176541 | * | G | G | G | G | * | G | * | INS (G) | ||||
| 1176542 | * | G | G | G | G | * | * | * | INS (G) | ||||
| 1176543 | * | G | G | G | G | * | * | * | INS (G) | ||||
| 1176544 | * | G | G | G | G | * | * | * | INS (G) | ||||
| 1176545 | * | G | G | G | G | * | * | * | INS (G) | ||||
| 1176546 | * | A | A | A | A | * | * | * | INS (A) | ||||
| 1626880 | G | G | G | G | G | C | C | C | C | ||||
| 1637246 | C | C | C | C | T | C | C | C | T | ||||
| 1647861 | C | C | C | A | C | A | A | C | A | gCg/gAg | A/E | ||
| 1984103 | T | T | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | tTc/tCc | F/S | ||
| 1965604 | T | T | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | Aag/Gag | K/E | ||
| 1968699 | G | G | G | A | G | G | G | G | A | ||||
| 2826237 | G | G | G | G | G | A | A | G | A | Cac/Tac | H/Y | ||
| 223961 | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | A | A | Gta/Ata | V/I | ||
| 224066 | G | G | G | G | G | A | A | G | A | Gcc/Acc | A/T | ||
| 511992 | A | A | A | G | A | G | G | G | G | ||||
| 514171 | G | G | G | A | G | A | A | A | A | ||||
| 2374322 | T | T | T | C | T | C | C | C | C | tAc/tGc | Y/C | ||
| 2376650 | G | G | G | A | G | A | A | A | A | Ccc/Tcc | P/S | ||
| 2363842 | C | C | C | C | T | C | C | C | T | ctG/ctA |
* corresponds insertions or deletions.
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree based on 337 SNP. 337 SNP (comprising all SNPs found in all tested isolates) were concatenated using SynTview (http://genopole.pasteur.fr/SynTView/). Alignment was done using multalin (http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/) and the phylogenetic tree was done using Quicktree (http://mobyle.pasteur.fr/cgi-bin/portal.py?#forms::quicktree).
Figure 2Box-plots of qRT-PCR data (based on liquid cultures). Comparison of the expression levels of the key virulence genes cyaA, ptxA, fhaB, and prn between ptxP1 and ptxP3 isolates. Data have been normalized vs. (A) the ptxP1 calibrator Tohama or (B) the ptxP3 calibrator FR5133. Dots represent each single experiment performed. For each isolate, three technical replicates from each of the two biological replicates are presented. Exact p-values reported for each comparison.
Figure 3Box-plots of qRT-PCR data (based on liquid cultures). Comparison of the expression levels of the key virulence genes cyaA, ptxA, fhaB, and prn between FHA− and FHA+ isolates. Data have been normalized vs. (A) the ptxP1 calibrator Tohama or (B) the ptxP3 calibrator FR5133. Dots represent each single experiment performed. For each isolate, thrree technical replicates from each of the two biological replicates are presented. Exact p-values reported for each comparison.