| Literature DB >> 26388671 |
Kanae Matsushita1, Masahide Hamaguchi1, Motomu Hashimoto2, Masahiro Yamazaki1, Toru Yamazaki3, Keita Asai3, Masashi Yamori3, Kazuhisa Bessho3, Hitoshi Toda4, Goji Hasegawa5, Naoto Nakamura1, Michiaki Fukui1.
Abstract
Microbiota has been thought to be one of important environmental factors for obesity or Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Among oral microbe, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola and Tannellera forsythia are known as risk factors, so called red complex, for periodontitis. Red complex could also be a risk factor for obesity. However, recent study indicated that obesity was not improved by periodontal therapy. Thus, we performed a cross sectional study to reveal the association of oral microbe with body mass index in a healthy population. Healthy individuals were randomly recruited. The infections of oral microbe were identified by Taqman polymerase chain reaction. The relationships between number of red complex and body mass index or waist circumference were analyzed. Two hundred and twenty-two apparently healthy Japanese were enrolled. BMI and waist circumference as well as age, periodontitis, number of brushing teeth were significantly associated with the number of red complex after adjusting covariance. The effect size of body mass index or waist circumference was 0.023 (p = 0.028) or 0.024 (p = 0.024), respectively. Body mass index and waist circumference were independently associated with the number of red complex among apparently healthy Japanese. The current observation implies the possibility that oral microbe was associated with obesity in healthy population.Entities:
Keywords: body mass index; obesity; oral microbe; red complex; waist circumference
Year: 2015 PMID: 26388671 PMCID: PMC4566028 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.15-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
The primer sequences for detecting indicated oral bacteria
| FAM labeled probe | Forward primer | Reverse primer | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGCTGTAAGATAGGCATGCGTCCCATTAGCTA | TGCAACTTGCCTTACAGAGGG | ACTCGTATCGCCCGTTATTC | |
| TGAGTAACGCGTATGTAACCTGCCCGC | AGCGATGGTAGCAATACCTGTC | TTCGCCGGGTTATCCCTC | |
| ATGGGCCCGCGTCCCATTAGC | CCGAATGTGCTCATTTACATAAAGGT | GATACCCATCGTTGCCTTGGT |
Baseline characteristics of the study subjects
| N | 222 |
| Gender, Male % (n) | 65.8 (146) |
| Age, year | 52.0 ± 11.2 |
| FPG, mg/dl | 94.6 ± 9.3 |
| IRI, µU/ml | 3.12 ± 2.16 |
| HOMA-R | 0.74 ± 0.56 |
| HbA1c, % | 5.41 ± 0.28 |
| BMI, kg/m² | 22.1 ± 3.0 |
| Waist circumstance, cm | 79.0 ± 8.9 |
| Ex-smoker, % (n) | 16.7% (37) |
| Number of brushing teeth in a day | 2.17 ± 0.75 |
| Periodontal disease, % (n) | 50.9% (113) |
| Positive number of red complex | 1.79 ± 1.09 |
| 46.8% (104) | |
| 58.6% (130) | |
| 73.9% (164) |
Continuous value are expressed as mean ± SD, categorical values are expressed as % (n). Abbreviations are used as fasting plasma glucose, FPG; immune reactive insulin, IRI; homeostasis model assessment ratio, HOMA-R; body mass index, BMI.
The univariate analysis of age, metabolic parameters, BMI, waist circumferences for red complex
| Positive number of infection of red complex | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 vs 1 | 0 vs 2 | 0 vs 3 | ||
| 36 | 51 | 58 | 77 | |||||
| Age, year | 49.8 ± 10.4 | 49.6 ± 11.0 | 52.2 ± 10.7 | 54.5 ± 11.7 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.15 | |
| FPG, mg/dl | 92.1 ± 8.7 | 94.5 ± 7.2 | 96.9 ± 10.8 | 93.9 ± 9.1 | 0.63 | 0.07 | 0.77 | |
| IRI, µU/ml | 3.2 ± 2.9 | 3.2 ± 1.6 | 3.1 ± 2.2 | 3.0 ± 2.1 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | |
| HOMA-R | 0.7 ± 0.7 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.5 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |
| HbA1c, % | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 5.3 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.3 | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 1.00 | |
| BMI, kg/m² | 21.2 ± 3.0 | 21.8 ± 3.2 | 22.5 ± 3.2 | 22.5 ± 2.8 | 0.78 | 0.20 | 0.17 | |
| WC, cm | 76.6 ± 8.0 | 77.0 ± 8.0 | 80.8 ± 9.5 | 80.0 ± 8.9 | 0.99 | 0.10 | 0.20 | |
| Brushing teeth | 2.25 ± 0.73 | 2.35 ± 0.79 | 2.10 ± 0.76 | 2.05 ± 0.71 | 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.55 | |
| Periodontitis | 36.1% (13) | 41.2% (21) | 56.9% (33) | 59.7% (46) | 0.79 | 0.08 | 0.03 | |
| Ex-smoker | 11.1% (4) | 15.7% (8) | 22.4% (13) | 15.6% (12) | 0.76 | 0.26 | 0.72 | |
Continuous values are expressed as mean ± SD and are analyzed using with one-way analysis of variance. Tukey honestly significant difference test is used as post hoc test. Abbreviations are used as fasting plasma glucose, FPG; immune reactive insulin, IRI; homeostasis model assessment ratio, HOMA-R; body mass index, BMI; waist circumferences, WC. Red complex is consisted with P. gingivalis, T. denticola and T. forsythia.
The univariate analysis of age, metabolic parameters, BMI, and waist circumferences for P. gingivalis, T. denticola or T. forsythia
| Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 118 | 104 | 92 | 130 | 58 | 164 | ||||||
| Age, year | 49.4 ± 10.4 | 55 ± 11.4 | <0.001 | 51.2 ± 11.1 | 52.6 ± 11.2 | 0.38 | 50.3 ± 10.3 | 52.6 ± 11.4 | 0.18 | ||
| FPG, mg/dl | 94.7 ± 9.4 | 94.4 ± 9.2 | 0.76 | 94.1 ± 8.8 | 94.9 ± 9.6 | 0.49 | 92.9 ± 7.9 | 95.2 ± 9.6 | 0.10 | ||
| IRI, µU/ml | 3.16 ± 2.2 | 3.08 ± 2.12 | 0.76 | 3.21 ± 2.34 | 3.06 ± 2.04 | 0.60 | 3.22 ± 2.44 | 3.09 ± 2.06 | 0.67 | ||
| HOMAR | 0.76 ± 0.57 | 0.73 ± 0.56 | 0.76 | 0.76 ± 0.6 | 0.73 ± 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.75 ± 0.6 | 0.74 ± 0.55 | 0.92 | ||
| HbA1c, % | 5.42 ± 0.29 | 5.41 ± 0.27 | 0.87 | 5.38 ± 0.28 | 5.44 ± 0.29 | 0.10 | 5.39 ± 0.29 | 5.42 ± 0.28 | 0.44 | ||
| BMI, kg/m² | 21.7 ± 3.2 | 22.6 ± 2.9 | 0.038 | 21.9 ± 3.3 | 22.3 ± 2.9 | 0.31 | 21.5 ± 2.9 | 22.4 ± 3.1 | 0.063 | ||
| WC, cm | 77.5 ± 8.6 | 80.6 ± 8.9 | 0.009 | 78 ± 8.4 | 79.6 ± 9.1 | 0.19 | 77.2 ± 8.2 | 79.6 ± 9 | 0.081 | ||
| Brushing teeth | 2.16 ± 0.76 | 2.17 ± 0.74 | 0.95 | 2.29 ± 0.76 | 2.08 ± 0.73 | 0.034 | 2.38 ± 0.74 | 2.09 ± 0.74 | 0.012 | ||
| Periodontitis | 46.6% (55) | 55.8% (58) | 0.18 | 41.3% (38) | 57.7% (75) | 0.02 | 36.2% (21) | 56.1% (92) | 0.01 | ||
| Ex-smoker | 16.1% (19) | 17.3% (18) | 0.86 | 15.2% (14) | 17.7% (23) | 0.72 | 13.8% (8) | 17.7% (29) | 0.55 | ||
Continuous values are expressed as mean ± SD and are analyzed using with one-way analysis of variance. Tukey honestly significant difference test is used as post hoc test. Abbreviations are used as fasting plasma glucose, FPG; immune reactive insulin, IRI; homeostasis model assessment ratio, HOMA-R; body mass index, BMI; waist circumferences, WC.
The adjusted effect size for the number of red complex
| Effect size | Effect size | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPG, mg/dl | 0.960 | 0.000 | FPG, mg/dl | 0.805 | 0.000 | |
| IRI, µU/ml | 0.083 | 0.014 | IRI, µU/ml | 0.091 | 0.014 | |
| Sex | 0.091 | 0.013 | Sex | 0.131 | 0.011 | |
| Age, years | 0.023 | 0.024 | Age, years | 0.033 | 0.021 | |
| Ex-smoker | 0.198 | 0.008 | Smoker | 0.246 | 0.006 | |
| Periodontitis | 0.012 | 0.029 | Periodontitis | 0.010 | 0.031 | |
| Brushing teeth | 0.185 | 0.008 | Brushing teeth | 0.213 | 0.007 | |
| BMI, kg/m² | 0.028 | 0.023 | WC, cm | 0.024 | 0.024 |
Multivariate analysis of covariance is used for calculating the effect size of each parameter for the number of components of red complex. FPG, IRI, sex, age, smoking states, periodontitis, number of brushing teeth in a day are used as covariances. Abbreviations are used as fasting plasma glucose, FPG; immune reactive insulin, IRI; homeostasis model assessment ratio, HOMA-R; body mass index, BMI; waist circumferences, WC. Red complex is consisted with P. gingivalis, T. denticola and T. forsythia.