M Eder1, B Csapo1, C Wadsack1, J Haas1, P M Catalano2, G Desoye1, M N M van Poppel3,4. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. 2. Department of Reproductive Biology, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Institute of Sport Science, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Excessive fat accumulation characterizes the over-nourished fetus in maternal diabetes and obesity with fetal insulin regarded as a primary driver. This study tested whether fetal insulin is related to subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) thickness at different body sites in neonates, and whether sites respond differentially to insulin. In addition, sex differences were assessed. METHODS: Cord blood insulin was measured for 414 neonates. After birth, SAT thickness was measured at 15 body sites using a validated device, a lipometer, that measures back-scattered light intensities corresponding to SAT. Associations between fetal insulin and SAT were assessed in linear regression models, adjusted for gestational age and birth weight, for males and females separately. RESULTS: No sex differences in insulin levels or total SAT thickness were found. In males, SAT thickness at most body sites was significantly correlated with insulin, with strongest associations between insulin and SAT on neck (beta 0.23, 95% CI 0.05; 0.41; P=0.01) and upper abdomen (beta 0.18, 95% CI 0.01; 0.36; P=0.04). In females, insulin was only associated with hip SAT thickness (beta 0.22, 95% CI 0.06; 0.39; P=0.01). Total SAT thickness was correlated with insulin in males (beta 0.03, 95% CI 0.01; 0.04; P=0.003), but not in females (beta 0.01, 95% CI -0.01; 0.02; P=0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Fat deposition in female neonates seems less affected by insulin as compared to males. This may reflect lower insulin sensitivity in females, or may be accounted for by other metabolic/endocrine factors overriding the association.
BACKGROUND: Excessive fat accumulation characterizes the over-nourished fetus in maternal diabetes and obesity with fetal insulin regarded as a primary driver. This study tested whether fetal insulin is related to subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) thickness at different body sites in neonates, and whether sites respond differentially to insulin. In addition, sex differences were assessed. METHODS:Cord blood insulin was measured for 414 neonates. After birth, SAT thickness was measured at 15 body sites using a validated device, a lipometer, that measures back-scattered light intensities corresponding to SAT. Associations between fetal insulin and SAT were assessed in linear regression models, adjusted for gestational age and birth weight, for males and females separately. RESULTS: No sex differences in insulin levels or total SAT thickness were found. In males, SAT thickness at most body sites was significantly correlated with insulin, with strongest associations between insulin and SAT on neck (beta 0.23, 95% CI 0.05; 0.41; P=0.01) and upper abdomen (beta 0.18, 95% CI 0.01; 0.36; P=0.04). In females, insulin was only associated with hip SAT thickness (beta 0.22, 95% CI 0.06; 0.39; P=0.01). Total SAT thickness was correlated with insulin in males (beta 0.03, 95% CI 0.01; 0.04; P=0.003), but not in females (beta 0.01, 95% CI -0.01; 0.02; P=0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Fat deposition in female neonates seems less affected by insulin as compared to males. This may reflect lower insulin sensitivity in females, or may be accounted for by other metabolic/endocrine factors overriding the association.
Authors: Reinhard Möller; Erwin Tafeit; Karl Heinz Smolle; Thomas R. Pieber; Osman Ipsiroglu; Martina Duesse; Christian Huemer; Karl Sudi; Gilbert Reibnegger Journal: Am J Hum Biol Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 1.937
Authors: Beverley M Shields; Bridget Knight; Heather Hopper; Anita Hill; Roy J Powell; Andrew T Hattersley; Penelope M Clark Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-05-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Eliana M Wendland; Maria Regina Torloni; Maicon Falavigna; Janet Trujillo; Maria Alice Dode; Maria Amélia Campos; Bruce B Duncan; Maria Inês Schmidt Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2012-03-31 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: A Sbarbati; D Accorsi; D Benati; L Marchetti; G Orsini; G Rigotti; P Panettiere Journal: Eur J Histochem Date: 2010-11-25 Impact factor: 3.188
Authors: Dana Dabelea; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Archana P Lamichhane; Ralph B D'Agostino; Angela D Liese; Kendra S Vehik; K M Venkat Narayan; Phillip Zeitler; Richard F Hamman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-03-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Melissa E Heard-Lipsmeyer; Eva C Diaz; Clark R Sims; Sarah R Sobik; Meghan L Ruebel; Keshari M Thakali; Rebecca A Krukowski; Mario Cleves; Elisabet Børsheim; Kartik Shankar; Aline Andres Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Julia Knabl; Lena de Maiziere; Rebecca Hüttenbrenner; Stefan Hutter; Julia Jückstock; Sven Mahner; Franz Kainer; Gernot Desoye; Udo Jeschke Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 5.923