Literature DB >> 26388320

Investigation of bacterial repopulation after sinus surgery and perioperative antibiotics.

Leah J Hauser1, Diana Ir2, Todd T Kingdom1, Charles E Robertson3,4,5, Daniel N Frank2,3, Vijay R Ramakrishnan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) enjoys high success rates, but repopulation with pathogenic bacteria is 1 of the hallmarks of poorer outcomes. There are many hypothesized sources of repopulating bacteria; however, this process remains largely unexplored. This study examined changes in the sinus microbiome after ESS and medical therapies to identify potential sources for postsurgical microbial repopulation.
METHODS: Samples from the anterior nares, ethmoid sinus, and nasopharynx were taken at the time of surgery from 13 subjects undergoing ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Patients were treated postoperatively with 2 weeks of oral antibiotics and saline rinses. The ethmoid sinus was sampled at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively; microbiota were characterized using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing. The Morisita-Horn beta-diversity index (M-H) was used to compare similarity between samples.
RESULTS: The bacterial burden of the ethmoid was higher 2 weeks postoperatively than 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.01). The 6-week samples most closely represented the anterior nares and ethmoid at surgery (M-H = 0.58 and 0.59, respectively), and were least similar to the nasopharynx (M-H = 0.28). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots illustrate that the ethmoid microbiota temporarily shifted after surgery and antibiotics but returned toward baseline in many subjects.
CONCLUSION: Bacterial communities colonizing the ethmoid 6 weeks postoperatively were most similar to anterior nasal cavity and pretreatment sinus microbial profiles, indicating a high degree of resilience in the sinonasal microbiome of most subjects. Interestingly, surgery and postoperative antibiotic therapy does not appear to reduce bacterial burden, but rather, shifts the microbial consortia.
© 2015 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacteria; bacterial repopulation; chronic rhinosinusitis; microbiome; pyrosequencing; sinusitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26388320     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  16 in total

Review 1.  The Landscape Ecology and Microbiota of the Human Nose, Mouth, and Throat.

Authors:  Diana M Proctor; David A Relman
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 21.023

Review 2.  Therapy of Sinonasal Microbiome in CRS: A Critical Approach.

Authors:  Alkis J Psaltis; Peter-John Wormald
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Bacterial Pathogens and the Microbiome.

Authors:  Thad W Vickery; Vijay R Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  Unraveling the role of the microbiome in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Alkis J Psaltis; Brett Wagner Mackenzie; Emily K Cope; Vijay R Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 14.290

Review 5.  The sinonasal bacterial microbiome in health and disease.

Authors:  Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Leah J Hauser; Daniel N Frank
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Bacterial microbiome in the nose of healthy cats and in cats with nasal disease.

Authors:  Elisabeth S Dorn; Barbara Tress; Jan S Suchodolski; Tariq Nisar; Prajesh Ravindran; Karin Weber; Katrin Hartmann; Bianka S Schulz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Long-term infectious complications of using porous polyethylene mesh for orbital fracture reconstruction.

Authors:  Xuefei Song; Lunhao Li; Yiyuan Sun; Xianqun Fan; Zhengkang Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Potential Role of Microbial Dysbiosis and Recommendations for Sampling Sites.

Authors:  Elizabeth Copeland; Katherine Leonard; Richard Carney; Justin Kong; Martin Forer; Yuresh Naidoo; Brian G G Oliver; Justin R Seymour; Stephen Woodcock; Catherine M Burke; Nicholas W Stow
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 9.  Modelling upper respiratory tract diseases: getting grips on host-microbe interactions in chronic rhinosinusitis using in vitro technologies.

Authors:  Charlotte De Rudder; Marta Calatayud Arroyo; Sarah Lebeer; Tom Van de Wiele
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 10.  Microbiota Composition and the Integration of Exogenous and Endogenous Signals in Reactive Nasal Inflammation.

Authors:  Francesco Antonio Salzano; Luigi Marino; Giovanni Salzano; Riccardo Maria Botta; Giovanni Cascone; Umberto D'Agostino Fiorenza; Carmine Selleri; Vincenzo Casolaro
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 4.818

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.