A Stimuli-Responsive Rotaxane-Gold Catalyst: Regulation of Activity and Diastereoselectivity.

A rotaxane-based Au catalyst was developed and the effect of the mechanical bond on its behavior was studied. Unlike the non-interlocked thread, the rotaxane requires a catalytically innocent cofactor, the identity of which significantly influences both the yield and diastereoselectivity of the reaction. Under optimized conditions, Au(I) (the catalyst), Ag(I) (to abstract the Cl(-) ligand), and Cu(I) (the cofactor) combine to produce a catalyst with excellent activity and selectivity.

Catalysts based on interlocked molecules have recently begun to receive increased attention.1 Tn class="Chemical">he majority of the systems reported take advantage of the well-studied ability of the mechanically bonded components to undergo large-amplitude relative motion,2 including examples in which this motion alters the reaction chemoselectivity,3 machines inspired by DNA polymerase that employ an interlocked catalyst–substrate architecture to produce highly processive reactions,4 and systems where the catalytic activity of the rotaxane is controlled by reversible shielding of organocatalytic moieties in the thread.5–7

In contrast to these applications of mechanical motion, comparatively little is known about tn class="Chemical">he influence of the mechanical bond itself on the outcome of catalyzed reactions.8 In 2004, Takata and co-workers reported that an achiral imidazolium organocatalyst encircled by a chiral macrocycle mediates an enantioselective benzoin reaction, albeit with moderate ee.9 Very recently, Leigh and co-workers reported a chiral [2]rotaxane ligand for Ni that exhibits higher enantioselectivity than a non-interlocked model complex, although at the cost of reduced activity owing to steric hindrance.10 These results suggest that the sterically crowded environment provided by the mechanical bond could be used to engineer novel reaction fields to alter the stereoselectivity of catalysts that are hard to control with conventional scaffolds.

Although synthetically powerful, gold(I)-mediated reactions are perhaps tn class="Chemical">he quintessential example of an activation mode for which it is hard to engineer the ligand to sterically influence the reaction because of the linear coordination geometry of AuI.11 Herein, we report a rotaxane–gold catalyst12, 13 in which the mechanical bond influences both diastereoselectivity and catalytic activity, and we demonstrate stimuli-responsive control of both of these important reaction parameters.

Rotaxane–gold complex [n class="Chemical">4AuCl] was synthesized14 in excellent yield over three steps from macrocycle 1, alkyne 2, and azide 3 by using our small-macrocycle modification15 of Leigh’s active template Cu-mediated alkyne–azide cycloaddition16 (AT-CuAAC) reaction,17 followed by reduction of the phosphine oxide moiety and formation of the Au complex (Scheme 1). Non-interlocked complex [5AuCl] was synthesized in an analogous manner.

scheme 1

Synthesis of [4AuCl] and [5AuCl]. Reagents and Conditions: i) [Cu(MeCN)4]PF6, iPr2EtN, EtOH, 80 °C, 18 h; ii) Cl3SiH, Et3N, PhMe/CH2Cl2 (6:1), 100 °C, 18 h; iii) Me2SAuCl, CH2Cl2, RT, 1 h.

During the syntn class="Chemical">hesis of 4 and 5, the first significant effect of the mechanical bond became apparent: although phosphine rotaxane 4 does not require special handling, non-interlocked 5 is extremely susceptible to oxidation and reverts to the corresponding phosphine oxide on standing in CDCl3. Thus, the mechanical bond appears to stabilize the relatively electron-rich alkyl phosphine moiety.8 Single crystals of [4AuCl] suitable for X-ray analysis were grown by slow evaporation from CDCl3 (Figure 1).18 The space-filling representation of [4AuCl] clearly demonstrates the sterically hindered environment around the Au center provided by the mechanical bond. In the solid state, triazole proton H and one of methylene protons H participate in bifurcated C–H⋅⋅⋅N hydrogen bonds with the pyridine nitrogen atoms.

Figure 1

Single-crystal X-ray structure of [4AuCl] as a) a capped-stick model with the shorter of the N⋅⋅⋅H contacts indicated; b) a space-filling representation. 1H labelling as in Scheme 1. Selected interatomic distances: N4–H=2.7 Å; N5–H=3.1 Å; N4–H=2.9 Å; N5–H=2.7 Å; P–Au=2.2 Å; Au–Cl=2.3 Å; angle P-Au-Cl=176°.

Single-crystal X-ray structure of [4AuCl] as a) a capped-stick model with tn class="Chemical">he shorter of the N⋅⋅⋅H contacts indicated; b) a space-filling representation. 1H labelling as in Scheme 1. Selected interatomic distances: N4–H=2.7 Å; N5–H=3.1 Å; N4–H=2.9 Å; N5–H=2.7 Å; P–Au=2.2 Å; Au–Cl=2.3 Å; angle P-Au-Cl=176°.

Despite the unusual nature of tn class="Chemical">he Au coordination environment in [4AuCl], the 31P NMR spectra of the thread and rotaxane–AuCl complexes are similar (Figure 2), exhibiting single resonances at 26.2 and 29.2 ppm, respectively. In contrast, their 1H NMR spectra are very different; as well as the expected shielding of thread resonances (e.g. H, H and H), triazole proton H resonates at 9.5 ppm in the rotaxane–Au complex, which is 1.7 ppm higher than in [5AuCl], thus suggesting that the C–H⋅⋅⋅N hydrogen bond between H and the bipyridine nitrogen atom observed in the solid state is at least partially maintained in solution.

Figure 2

Partial 31P (162 MHz) and 1H (400 MHz) NMR (CDCl3, 300 K) spectra for a) [5AuCl], b) [4AuCl], c) [4AuCl]+AgSbF6, and d) [4AuCl]+[Cu(MeCN)4]PF6+AgSbF6. Selected peaks are assigned with labelling as shown in Scheme 1. Solvent peaks are shown in dark grey.

To investigate the effect of tn class="Chemical">he mechanical bond on the catalytic behavior of [4AuCl], we selected Toste’s AuI-mediated modification of the Ohe–Uemura cyclopropanation reaction as a simple, well-understood model system.19, 20 As in many AuI-mediated reactions, the active catalyst is proposed to be an LAu+ π acid, typically generated by abstraction of the Cl ligand from LAuCl by AgI salts.11 31P NMR analysis of the product of treating [4AuCl] with AgSbF6 (Figure 2 c) revealed a new resonance at higher chemical shift (38.7 ppm), which is consistent with Cl abstraction and formation of a solvated PAu+ complex.21 However, in the presence of AgSbF6, [4AuCl] failed to mediate the reaction between propargylic ester 6 and styrene (7) to produce cyclopropanes 8 (Table 1, entry 1). Despite the lack of activity of [4AuCl], in situ NMR analysis of reactions containing [4AuCl] confirmed the presence of [4Au]+ under the reaction conditions. In contrast, non-interlocked complex [5AuCl] (entry 2) successfully produced 8 with moderate selectivity in good yield.

Table 1

Effect of additives on the catalytic activity of [4AuCl] and [5AuCl].

Entry	[LAuCl]	Additive	Yield[a] (cis/trans[b])
1	[4AuCl]	–	n.r.
2	[5AuCl]	–	85 % (10:1)
3	[4AuCl]	TsOH	62 % (15:1)
4	[4AuCl]	[Cu(MeCN)4]PF6	93 % (16:1)
5	[4AuCl]	Zn(OTf)2	76 % (13:1)
6	[4AuCl]	Cd(OTf)2	58 % (11:1)
7	[5AuCl]	Zn(OTf)2	86 % (10:1)
8	[5AuCl]	[Cu(MeCN)4]PF6	68 % (9:1)
9	–	H+, CuI, ZnII or CdII	n.r.

Determined by 1H NMR with Cl2CHCHCl2 as internal standard. n.r.=no reaction. [b] Determined by HPLC analysis.

Comparison of the n class="Chemical">1H NMR spectra of [4AuCl] and [4Au]+ provided a clue to the origin of the lack of activity of the rotaxane catalyst: upon abstraction of the Cl anion, the resonance corresponding to triazole proton H shifts from 9.5 to 7.5 ppm, thus suggesting that the C–H⋅⋅⋅N interaction present in [4AuCl] is at least partially interrupted in [4Au]+. This observation is consistent with the Au+ center interacting with the N donor atoms of the macrocycle, thereby interrupting the weaker hydrogen-bonding interaction. The proposed N–Au interaction would be expected to temper the catalytic activity of [4Au]+ by reducing the π-acidity of the metal center and preventing coordination of the substrate.22 Based on this hypothesis, a solution suggested itself: the addition of a guest that coordinates in the macrocyclic cavity and is able to effectively compete with the N–Au interaction should remove the inhibition and switch the catalyst “on”.23

Addition of TsOH, [n class="Chemical">Cu(MeCN)4]PF6, Zn(OTf)2, or Cd(OTf)2 to a solution of [4AuCl] in CDCl3 led to dramatic changes in the 1H NMR spectra but minimal change in the 31P resonance (∂P=24.5, 23.9, 27.7, and 24.4 ppm respectively; see the Supporting Information for details), thus suggesting that the P–Au bond is unaffected by guest binding. Addition of AgSbF6 to [4AuCl] and [Cu(MeCN)4]PF6 in CDCl3 resulted in the formation of a complex with a broad 31P resonance consistent with the desired PAu+ species (Figure 2 d). Furthermore, in the presence of 1 equiv of TsOH (Table 1, entry 3), [4AuCl] produced cyclopropanes 8 in reasonable yield in just 1 h. More effective still, both CuI and ZnII (entries 4 and 5 respectively) resulted in rapid reactions and excellent yields of 8. Replacing Zn(OTf)2 with Cd(OTf)2 (entry 6) led to a diminished yield. In contrast to the behavior of the rotaxane, reactions mediated by [5AuCl] were unaffected by the presence of ZnII (entry 7), while addition of CuI (entry 8) led to partial decomposition of the catalyst and a diminished yield of 8.24 In the absence of AuI, the additives have no intrinsic catalytic behavior (entry 9).

The effect of guest binding on tn class="Chemical">he catalytic behavior of [4AuCl] is noteworthy on a number of counts. Firstly, and most obviously, the activity of the catalyst is strongly dependent on the presence of the guest. Building on these results, we performed in situ switching experiments with [4AuCl] and the best performing guests, CuI and ZnII (Scheme 2). After 1 h, no reaction was observed in the absence of additives. Addition of Zn(OTf)2 or [Cu(MeCN)4]PF6 led to rapid production of cyclopropanes 8 in comparable yield and diastereoselectivity to the reaction in which the guest was introduced prior to the substrate. [4AuCl] thus behaves as a switchable catalyst, with an extremely large difference in activity between the “off” and “on” states.

scheme 2

Switching Experiment. Reagents and Conditions: [4AuCl] (5 mol %), AgSbF6 (5 mol %), CDCl3, RT, 1 h then addition of guest (5 mol %) and a further 1 h at RT. [a] Determined by 1H NMR with Cl2CHCHCl2 as an internal standard. [b] Determined by HPLC analysis.

Switching Experiment. Reagents and Conditions: [4AuCl] (5 mol %), n class="Chemical">AgSbF6 (5 mol %), CDCl3, RT, 1 h then addition of guest (5 mol %) and a further 1 h at RT. [a] Determined by 1H NMR with Cl2CHCHCl2 as an internal standard. [b] Determined by HPLC analysis.

Secondly, the selectivity observed in tn class="Chemical">he presence of CuI or TsOH is among the highest achieved by monodentate phosphines for these substrates.25 Since diastereoselectivity in Toste’s cyclopropanation reaction is correlated with ligand steric hindrance,20 we examined the steric demand of the rotaxane ligand by using Nolan’s % buried volume (%Vbur) parameter, a gross measure of the volume around the metal center occupied by the ligand atoms.26 Applying the calculation27 to the solid-state structure of [4AuCl] (Figure 1) revealed a %Vbur value of 44 %, which is significantly higher than that of PPh3 (30 %) and even sterically hindered ligand PtBu3 (38 %).26

Finally, and perhaps most strikingly, each guest examined gives rise to a different degree of diastereoselectivity. This variation is tentatively attributed to the modulation of tn class="Chemical">he reaction field provided by the mechanical bond upon guest binding; as well as disrupting the N–Au coordination, the binding of guests into the macrocycle cavity will alter the co-conformation between the macrocycle and thread, thereby rigidifying the catalyst framework and modifying the space around the reaction site in a manner akin to allosteric modulation of enzymatic catalysts.

The serendipitous isolation of n class="Chemical">[4(H)(AuCl)]AuCl2 as a minor byproduct during the synthesis of [4AuCl] provides insight into the effect of guest binding on the steric environment around the gold. In the solid-state structure of [4(H)(AuCl)]+ (see the Supporting Information), the proton guest is located between a triazole nitrogen and one of the bipyridine nitrogens. This binding event causes a co-conformational rearrangement compared with [4AuCl]; the Au–Cl bond of [4(H)(AuCl)]AuCl2 is projected towards rather than away from the bipyridine unit (compare to Figure 1), which clearly alters the three dimensional environment around the Au center. The calculated %Vbur of 42 % for [4(H)(AuCl)]AuCl2 also differs from that of [4AuCl], albeit by only 2 %. Although neither [4AuCl] or [4(H)(AuCl)]AuCl2 is of direct catalytic relevance, the large co-conformational change observed on protonation provides evidence for the proposed allosteric role of the guest.

To investigate the generality of tn class="Chemical">hese observations, we compared the reactions of substrates with different steric properties mediated by [tBu3PAuCl], [5AuCl], or [4AuCl] (Figure 3). In keeping with previous reports, alkyl-substituted cyclopropanes 9 and 12 were formed in low selectivity in the presence of [tBu3PAuCl], whereas variation of the ester moiety between OAc (10) and pivalate (OPiv; 11) led to no significant change in selectivity.20a This trend was repeated in the case of [5AuCl], although in all cases the selectivity was inferior to that of the bulkier tBu3P ligand. Reactions mediated by [4AuCl] gave the target cyclopropane with significantly higher selectivity than that produced with either non-interlocked catalyst, thus further demonstrating the sterically hindered environment provided by the mechanical bond. Once again, the diastereoselectivity of reactions mediated by [4AuCl] varied in a guest-dependent manner. However, whereas [4AuCl] produced benzoate esters 8 and 9 in higher d.r. in the presence of CuI than ZnII, this trend was reversed in the case of alkyl ester derived products 10–12. Thus, although the guest-dependent behavior of [4AuCl] is reproducible across the substrates investigated, the optimal guest appears to depend on the detailed structure of the reagents. This suggests that, in addition to a simple steric component, specific interactions between substrate and catalyst that vary with the identity of the guest may play a significant role.

Figure 3

Comparison of tBu3PAuCl, [5AuCl], and [4AuCl] with representative substrates. Selectivity determined by 1H NMR. Conditions as in Table 1.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a rotaxane-based n class="Chemical">Au catalyst and identified a new approach to the development of stimuli-responsive interlocked catalysts more generally. Although such behavior has previously been demonstrated in organocatalytic rotaxanes,5 this is the first example of a rotaxane-based metal complex with stimuli-responsive catalytic activity. Once switched on by guest binding, the flexible but sterically crowded28 environment of the mechanical bond was shown to strongly influence the diastereoselectivity of an Au-mediated reaction, thus demonstrating the potential of interlocked molecules for the design of new reaction fields for hard-to-influence transformations. The influence of the mechanical bond is also responsive to external stimuli, depending as it does on the nature of the guest, and this is the first time that such stimuli-responsive stereoselectivity has been observed in a rotaxane catalyst. The origin of this effect is tentatively proposed to be similar to allosteric modulation in enzymes, in which cofactor binding subtly influences the environment of the active site. Modification of the reaction field by guest binding in such rotaxane architectures offers a supramolecular approach to the optimization of catalyst activity and selectivity, the potential for catalytic signal application for the development of sensors,29 and the possibility of controlling not just the stereoselectivity but also the chemoselectivity of metal-catalyzed reactions in a stimuli-responsive manner.

Experimental Section

Switching experiment: CDCl3 (0.5 mL) was added to a sealed vial containing n class="Chemical">rotaxane [4AuCl] (7.1 mg, 0.0062 mmol) and AgSbF6 (2.2 mg, 0.0062 mmol). After 5 min, 6 (23.0 mg, 0.122 mmol) and 7 (50.9 mg, 0.489 mmol,) were added as solutions in CDCl3 (2.5 mL). A solution of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane in CDCl3 (1.22 m, 0.1 mL) was added and the resulting mixture was stirred for 1 h and analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The mixture was transferred into a vial containing the guest (0.0062 mmol). After 1 h, the reaction was analyzed by 1H NMR and HPLC.

Full crystallographic data and characterization of all novel compounds is given in the Supporting Information. CCDC 1406074–1406077 contains tn class="Chemical">he supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre.