Literature DB >> 26386956

Breast cancer screening utilization and understanding of current guidelines among rural U.S. women with private insurance.

Jeffrey Peppercorn1, Kevin Houck2, Nina Beri2, Victor Villagra3, Adane F Wogu4, Gary H Lyman5, Stephanie B Wheeler4.   

Abstract

Women living in rural areas of the U.S. face disparities in screening mammography and breast cancer outcomes. We sought to evaluate utilization of mammography, awareness of screening guidelines, and attitudes towards screening among rural insured U.S. women. We conducted a cross-sectional self-administered anonymous survey among 2000 women aged 40-64 insured by the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, a non-profit insurer for electrical utility workers in predominantly rural areas across the U.S. Outcomes included mammographic screening in the past year, screening interval, awareness of guidelines, and perceived barriers to screening. 1588 women responded to the survey (response rate 79.4 %). 74 % of respondents lived in a rural area. Among women aged 40-49, 66.5 % reported mammographic screening in the past year. 46 % received annual screening, 32 % biennial screening, and 22 % rare/no screening. Among women aged 50-64, 77.1 % reported screening in the past year. 63 % received annual screening, 25 % biennial screening, and 12 % rare/no screening. The majority of women (98 %) believed that the mammography can find breast cancer early and save lives. Less than 1 % of younger women, and only 14 % of women over age 50 identified the recommendations of the U.S. Preventative Services Screening Task Force as the current expert recommendations for screening. Screening practices tended to follow perceived guideline recommendations. When rural U.S. women over age 40 have insurance, most receive breast cancer screening. The screening guidelines of cancer advocacy groups and specialty societies appear more influential and widely recognized than those of the U.S. preventative services taskforce.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer screening; Guidelines; Health disparities; Rural; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26386956     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3566-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  8 in total

1.  Adherence to Guideline-Recommended Cancer Screening in Stroke Survivors: A Nationwide Analysis.

Authors:  Marialaura Simonetto; Stephanie Rutrick; Natalie M LeMoss; Kelsey N Lansdale; Scott T Tagawa; Hooman Kamel; Neal Parikh; Babak B Navi
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Reduced Survival Outcome After Receiving a New Cancer Diagnosis in the Emergency Department: Findings from a Hospital Network in Rural Eastern North Carolina.

Authors:  Hannah L Conley; C Suzanne Lea; Raven V Delgado; Paul Vos; Eleanor E Harris; Andrew Ju; Kimberly M Rathbun
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-10-10

3.  Area-level Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Mammography Screening: A Multilevel Analysis of the Health of Houston Survey.

Authors:  William A Calo; Sally W Vernon; David R Lairson; Stephen H Linder
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2016-01-22

4.  Influence of dental insurance coverage on access to preventive periodontal care in middle-aged and elderly populations: analysis of representative Korean Community Health Survey Data (2011-2015).

Authors:  Young-Eun Jang; Chun-Bae Kim; Nam-Hee Kim
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  Patient Perspectives on Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening, New Mexico, 2014.

Authors:  Shiraz I Mishra; Andrew L Sussman; Ambroshia M Murrietta; Christina M Getrich; Robert Rhyne; Richard E Crowell; Kathryn L Taylor; Ellen J Reifler; Pamela H Wescott; Ali I Saeed; Richard M Hoffman
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Mastectomized women's perception of breast cancer early detection.

Authors:  Indara Cavalcante Bezerra; Raimunda Magalhães da Silva; Cleoneide Paulo Oliveira; Christina César Praça Brasil; Mardênia Gomes Ferreira Vasconcelos; Marli Vilela Mamede; Marnewton Tadeu Pinheiro de Oliveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Patient and physician characteristics affect adherence to screening mammography: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Daniela Katz; Angela J Tengekyon; Natan R Kahan; Ronit Calderon-Margalit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Understanding lung cancer screening behavior: Racial, gender, and geographic differences among Indiana long-term smokers.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; James E Slaven; Patrick O Monahan; Rivienne Shedd-Steele; Nasser Hanna; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-02-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.