Literature DB >> 26386849

The Removal of Hydrogel Explants: An Analysis of 467 Consecutive Cases.

Niels Crama1, B Jeroen Klevering2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the complications associated with hydrogel explants and to describe the indications, surgical technique, and risks involved in the removal of a hydrogel explant.
DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent surgical removal of a symptomatic, swollen hydrogel explant.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 457 consecutive patients (467 eyes in total) who underwent surgical removal of a symptomatic, swollen episcleral MIRAgel (MIRA Inc., Waltham, MA) explant at the Radboud University Medical Center from 1998 to 2011. We reviewed the initial symptoms, clinical findings, surgical aspects, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presenting symptoms, retinal redetachment rate, and intraoperative scleral perforation.
RESULTS: The median interval between initial placement of the hydrogel explant and removal of the explant was 159 months. More than 34% of the episcleral hydrogel explants developed symptomatic swelling and required surgical removal. Intraoperative scleral perforation or retinal redetachment related to the removal of the explant occurred in 11% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of explants that ultimately develop symptomatic swelling is considerably higher than reported previously. A swollen hydrogel explant can be removed many years after the primary detachment surgery, and 11% of cases develop intraoperative scleral perforation or retinal redetachment.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26386849     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  7 in total

1.  Irreversible intraocular pressure elevation as a complication of MIRAgel scleral buckling.

Authors:  Yuya Tankyo; Yosuke Harada; Tomona Hiyama; Hiromi Ohara; Mina Mizukami; Hideaki Okumichi; Kazuyuki Hirooka; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  MIRAgel: the immunohistochemical expression of CD3, CD34, and CD68 in the surrounding capsule.

Authors:  M Roldan-Pallares; M LLanes-Estrada; F LLanes-Menendez
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Management of Delayed Complications of Hydrogel Scleral Buckles.

Authors:  Hsin-Yu Yang; Wei-Kuang Yu; Chieh-Chih Tsai
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Optic nerve compression as a late complication of a hydrogel explant with silicone encircling band.

Authors:  Niels Crama; Leo Kluijtmans; B Jeroen Klevering
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2018-04-19

5.  Removal of MIRAgel scleral buckle implants using Yankauer suction catheter with adjusted diameter.

Authors:  Shintaro Nakao; Takashi Nishida; Koh-Hei Sonoda
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-07

6.  Hydrogel (Miragel®) scleral explant, late orbital complication.

Authors:  Hani Basher ALBalawi; Khaled Saud Asharari; Naif Mamdouh Alali; Osama ALRaddadi; Moustafa Magliyah; Ghadah Bander Alanazi
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-02

7.  Management of complex retinal detachment from intraocular invasion of MIRAgel-a case report.

Authors:  Ming-Chieh Hsieh; Yan-Ting Chen; San-Ni Chen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.