Literature DB >> 26386315

Hydrogel arrays formed via differential wettability patterning enable combinatorial screening of stem cell behavior.

Ngoc Nhi T Le1, Stefan Zorn2, Samantha K Schmitt1, Padma Gopalan3, William L Murphy4.   

Abstract

Here, we have developed a novel method for forming hydrogel arrays using surfaces patterned with differential wettability. Our method for benchtop array formation is suitable for enhanced-throughput, combinatorial screening of biochemical and biophysical cues from chemically defined cell culture substrates. We demonstrated the ability to generate these arrays without the need for liquid handling systems and screened the combinatorial effects of substrate stiffness and immobilized cell adhesion peptide concentration on human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) behavior during short-term 2-dimensional cell culture. Regardless of substrate stiffness, hMSC initial cell attachment, spreading, and proliferation were linearly correlated with immobilized CRGDS peptide concentration. Increasing substrate stiffness also resulted in increased hMSC initial cell attachment, spreading, and proliferation; however, examination of the combinatorial effects of CRGDS peptide concentration and substrate stiffness revealed potential interplay between these distinct substrate signals. Maximal hMSC proliferation seen on substrates with either high stiffness or high CRGDS peptide concentration suggests that some baseline level of cytoskeletal tension was required for hMSC proliferation on hydrogel substrates and that multiple substrate signals could be engineered to work in synergy to promote mechanosensing and regulate cell behavior. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Our novel array formation method using surfaces patterned with differential wettability offers the advantages of benchtop array formation for 2-dimensional cell cultures and enhanced-throughput screening without the need for liquid handling systems. Hydrogel arrays formed via our method are suitable for screening the influence of chemical (e.g. cell adhesive ligands) and physical (stiffness, size, shape, and thickness) substrate properties on stem cell behavior. The arrays are also fully compatible with commercially available micro-array add-on systems, which allows for simultaneous control of the insoluble and soluble cell culture environment. This study used hydrogel arrays to demonstrate that synergy between cell adhesion and mechanosensing can be used to regulate hMSC behavior.
Copyright © 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell adhesion; Human mesenchymal stem cell; Mechanosensing; Poly(ethylene glycol); RGD peptide; Thiol-ene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26386315      PMCID: PMC4794413          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  39 in total

Review 1.  Forcing stem cells to behave: a biophysical perspective of the cellular microenvironment.

Authors:  Yubing Sun; Christopher S Chen; Jianping Fu
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 12.981

2.  Muscle shear elastic modulus measured using supersonic shear imaging is highly related to muscle activity level.

Authors:  Antoine Nordez; François Hug
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-02-18

3.  Quantifying the relation between adhesion ligand-receptor bond formation and cell phenotype.

Authors:  Hyun Joon Kong; Tanyarut Boontheekul; David J Mooney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Arrays of topographically and peptide-functionalized hydrogels for analysis of biomimetic extracellular matrix properties.

Authors:  Michelle J Wilson; Yaming Jiang; Bernardo Yañez-Soto; Sara Liliensiek; William L Murphy; Paul F Nealey
Journal:  J Vac Sci Technol B Nanotechnol Microelectron       Date:  2012-10-29

5.  A chemically-defined screening platform reveals behavioral similarities between primary human mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells.

Authors:  Justin T Koepsel; Samuel G Loveland; Michael P Schwartz; Stefan Zorn; David G Belair; Ngoc Nhi Le; William L Murphy
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Britta Trappmann; Julien E Gautrot; John T Connelly; Daniel G T Strange; Yuan Li; Michelle L Oyen; Martien A Cohen Stuart; Heike Boehm; Bojun Li; Viola Vogel; Joachim P Spatz; Fiona M Watt; Wilhelm T S Huck
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Synthetic hydrogel niches that promote hMSC viability.

Authors:  Charles R Nuttelman; Margaret C Tripodi; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 11.583

8.  The influence of matrix degradation and functionality on cell survival and morphogenesis in PEG-based hydrogels.

Authors:  Asad Raza; Chien-Chi Lin
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 4.979

9.  Characterization of Thiol-Ene Crosslinked PEG Hydrogels.

Authors:  Michael W Toepke; Nicholas A Impellitteri; Jeffrey M Theisen; William L Murphy
Journal:  Macromol Mater Eng       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 4.367

Review 10.  Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  12 in total

1.  Microcarriers with Synthetic Hydrogel Surfaces for Stem Cell Expansion.

Authors:  Andrew D Dias; Jonathan M Elicson; William L Murphy
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 2.  The Advancement of Biomaterials in Regulating Stem Cell Fate.

Authors:  Vun Vun Hiew; Siti Fatimah Binti Simat; Peik Lin Teoh
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 3.  Recent advances in hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  S L Vega; M Y Kwon; J A Burdick
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 4.  Engineering Hydrogel Microenvironments to Recapitulate the Stem Cell Niche.

Authors:  Christopher M Madl; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  In situ 3D bioprinting with bioconcrete bioink.

Authors:  Mingjun Xie; Yang Shi; Chun Zhang; Mingjie Ge; Jingbo Zhang; Zichen Chen; Jianzhong Fu; Zhijian Xie; Yong He
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Aisenbrey; William L Murphy
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 66.308

7.  Customized hydrogel substrates for serum-free expansion of functional hMSCs.

Authors:  Ngoc Nhi T Le; Tianran Leona Liu; James Johnston; John D Krutty; Kayla Marie Templeton; Victoria Harms; Andrew Dias; Hau Le; Padma Gopalan; William L Murphy
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 6.843

8.  Facilitating trypanosome imaging.

Authors:  Marius Glogger; Ines Subota; Anna Pezzarossa; Anna-Lena Denecke; Mark Carrington; Susanne F Fenz; Markus Engstler
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.011

9.  From 3D to 3D: isolation of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells into a three-dimensional human platelet lysate matrix.

Authors:  Dominik Egger; Ana Catarina Oliveira; Barbara Mallinger; Hatim Hemeda; Verena Charwat; Cornelia Kasper
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.832

10.  Versatile synthetic alternatives to Matrigel for vascular toxicity screening and stem cell expansion.

Authors:  Eric H Nguyen; William T Daly; Ngoc Nhi T Le; Mitra Farnoodian; David G Belair; Michael P Schwartz; Connie S Lebakken; Gene E Ananiev; Mohammad Ali Saghiri; Thomas B Knudsen; Nader Sheibani; William L Murphy
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 25.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.